Host Behaviour Based Early Detection of Worm Outbreaks in Internet Backbones
早期预警评分(EWS)流程和程序说明书

Early Warning Score (EWS)PurposeUse of an Early Warning Score (EWS) assists with the recognition and appropriate response to the patient at risk of clinical deterioration as well as a clinically deteriorating patient. The EWS is a support to skilled clinical assessment, decision making and plan of care.An Early Warning Score must be used for all patients within a hospital setting when recording vital signs for: •Early detection of detrimental changes.•Safe, timely, effective management of care in response to a patient’s deteriorating condition. The EWS is to be communicated between staff when transferring patients between areas and with requests for clinical assistance.Specialist areas that do not use EWS routinely are required to calculate an EWS for safe transfer.Vital signs observation charts will contain the appropriate EWS tool.Types of early warning scores in use•The New Zealand Early Warning Score (NZEWS) is a nationally standardised scoring tool designed for adults. For the present the NZEWS is intended for adult non-maternity patients only.•Maternity patients use The New Zealand National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS). The MEWS should be used for all pregnant women of any gestation including up to 6 weeks after birth.•Paediatric patients up to 15 years of age, use the age appropriate Paediatric EWS (PEWS).•Neonates; babies born in CWH and CDHB primary birthing units use the new-born Observation Chart (NOC) which incorporates the New-born Early Warning Score (NEWS).•For the purposes of this policy when the term EWS is used, this encompasses the EWS, MEWS, PEWS, NEWS.ApplicabilityAll CDHB or contracted clinical staff (e.g. Agency nursing staff, Lead Maternity Carers with CDHB access agreement).DefinitionsEarly Warning Score ParametersAdult patientsFor an adult patient, the following observations/symptoms must be recorded to obtain an accurate NZEWS: •Respiratory rate calculated over 1 minute•Presence or absence of oxygen therapy•Oxygen saturation % (SpO2)•Heart rate for at least ½ minute•Blood pressure using appropriate cuff and calibrated equipment•Level of consciousness using AVPU (alert, voice, pain, unresponsive)•Temperature (using a consistent site and method)Pregnant women (of any gestation including up to 6 weeks after birth)For a maternity patient, the following observations / symptoms must be recorded to obtain an accurate MEWS:•Respiratory rate calculated over 1 minute•Supplemental oxygen administration(L/min)•Oxygen saturation % (SpO2)•Heart rate for at least ½ minute•Blood pressure•Temperature (using a consistent site and method)•Level of consciousness (normal or abnormal)Paediatric patientsFor a paediatric patient the following observations / symptoms must be completed on admission to obtain accurate PEWS. Subsequent observation requirements are determined by the PEWS management plan, the Nursing Observations and Monitoring Policy [Ref 239155] and/or as indicated by the paediatric medical team.•Respiratory rate calculated over 1 minute•Respiratory distress score•Oxygen saturation % (SpO2)•Heart rate for at least ½ minute•Blood pressure•Level of consciousness using AVPU (alert, voice, pain, unresponsive)•Capillary refill timeNote: Whilst temperature is not included in the PEWS, a baseline temperature recording is taken on admission and four hourly thereafter for an inpatient if within normal limits.NeonatesFor neonates during the immediate post-natal period (1-2 hours) post birth and then at 24 hours, the following should be observed and recorded on the New-born Observation Chart and a NEWS calculated: •Respiratory rate calculated over 1 minute•Work of Breathing•Temperature•Heart rate calculated over a minute•Colour•Behaviour / FeedingAll babies should be assessed against the risks for deterioration as outlined on the New-born Observation Chart and if identified to be at risk then observations and NEWS are performed as instructed and care escalated as required.Education and trainingAll staff within the scope of this procedure must have completed relevant clinical training on the EWS score, escalation and response.Education should be guided by the EWS decision tree.Early Warning Score Procedure Clinical staff responsibilitiesClinical staff responsibilitiesAll patients must have a clinically appropriate plan of care documented, including frequency of monitoring of vital signs, any limitations or ceiling of care and any modification to the response pathway.Staff must be able to perform their responsibilities within this procedure.1.Recognition: Activation1.1.Provide adequate privacy and ensure informed consent1.2.Take the vital signs using appropriate techniques, where applicable inform the patient or caregiverof the results and recording appropriate EWS, check for EWS triggers, and in the absence of Patientrack calculate thescore and record.1.4.Check clinical record for relevant treatment goals and/or plan of care1.5.If escalation pathway triggered, activate according to the response pathway zone colour andfollow plan.1.6.Care for patient, record and act on vital signs as per the EWS zone colour and clinical protocolswhile awaiting review.1.7.Record activation in clinical progress notes or where Cortex is available on the PatientDeterioration Form.1.8.For adults (except maternity), use of the NZEWS activation template is mandatory if a clinicalreview is requested.1.9.For maternity patients, use of the Activation of MEWS Pathway sticker (Ref: 2311278,) or digitalequivalent whenever discussion or further review is requested.Note: The EWS does not replace clinical judgement. Should a clinician or family member be concerned in the absence of a high EWS consider medical review. Within inpatient areas where Kōrero Mai – Patient Family Escalation has been implemented, staff are to support families with escalating care at their request and responding as applicable.2.Response: Escalation2.1.Respond according to the escalation pathway, clinical plans and clinical judgement2.2.Record the response in the clinical notes (using the appropriate response template):a.The EWS triggers and zoneb.Date and time of reviewc.Assessment, decisions and management plan including vital sign frequency (if contrary tothe EWS pathway recommendations) , follow up, higher level of care needs, treatmentlimitations and ceiling of cared.Staff notified and consultede.If a follow up review is required, indicate the timeframe for the review to prevent furtherpatient clinical deterioration.f.If a Senior Medical Officer or Registrar modifies the EWS, the reason is recorded, and themodification must be reviewed by the patient’s Home Team in the am the next day (12noon at the latest).munication / handover/ transfer of care requirementsAny pathway communication / handover or transfer of care with other staff is provided using ‘Identity, Situation, Background, Assessment, Response’ (ISBAR) communication method stating the:a.Patient’s condition / diagnosisb.Patient’s EWSc.The parameters that drove the scored.The actions already been takene.Repeat back the plan of action to take following the communication i.e. repeat EWS in settimeframe and contact medical staff again as required.Measurement / EvaluationUse of early warning system One System Dashboard in clinical governance meetings; regular audit of adherence of the EWS system conducted in areas using the CDHB EWS / MEWS / PEWS / NEWS Audit tool; inclusion in morbidity and mortality meetings.Evaluation can be guided by the EWS decision tree.Associated materialCDHB Resources:•Transfer of patients between hospitals.•ISBAR handover / communication policy.•Deteriorating Patient Activation and Response form document (Ref: 2406526)or digital equivalent Healthlearn•Deteriorating Patient Course (DP001)•New Zealand Early Warning Score•Paediatric Early Warning Score (PE001)•MEWS – Maternity Early Warning Score (RGMY001)•New-born Observation Chart with new-born Early Warning Score (RGMY002)NZEWS Zone / Score (Ref: 2403999) (Appendix 1)NZEWS site specific pathways (Appendix 2)•Christchurch Ref: 2405744•Burwood Ref: 2405791•Hillmorton Ref: 2404730•Ashburton Ref: 2406302PEWS pathway (Appendix 5)Nursing Observation and Monitoring - Paediatrics (Ref: 2405195)EWS decision tree (Appendix 3)MEWS site specific pathways (Appendix 4)•Christchurch Women’s Hospital (Maternity, Birthing Suite, Maternity Assessment Unit, Women’s Outpatient Department) (Ref: 2406285)•Primary Units (Ashburton, Lincoln, Kaikoura, Darfield, Rangiora) (Ref: 2406474)•St. Georges maternity Ref: (2406789)•Activation of MEWS Pathway sticker (Ref: 2404638)•Minimum Frequencies of Observations for Maternity Early Warning Score (MEWS) Chart (Ref: 2404636)NOC/NEWS (Appendix 6)•CDHB New-born Observation Chart 6676 (Ref: 2401230)•CDHB New-born Record QMR0044 (Ref: 2400438)•Observation of mother and baby in the immediate postnatal period: consensus statements guiding practice, MOH, (July 2012)Kōrero Mai - Patient Family Escalation - “Are you Concerned” Signage (Ref: 2407406, 2406997, ,2406998. Shared Goals of Care Document (Ref: 2406924)Appendix One: NZEWS Zone calculatorAppendix two: CDHB NZEWS site specific response pathwaysAppendix three: EWS decision treeAppendix four: Modified Early Obstetric Warning (MEWS) Management Protocol Score and management/responseChristchurch Women’s Hospital(Maternity, Birthing Suite, Maternity Assessment Unit, Women’s Outpatient Department)CDHB Primary Community Maternity Units (Ashburton, Lincoln, Kaikoura, Darfield, Rangiora)St. George’s Maternity UnitAppendix five: Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) Management Protocol Score and management / responseAppendix six: Guide of When to use the New-born Observation Chart and NEWSContentsEarly Warning Score (EWS) (1)Purpose (1)Types of early warning scores in use (1)Applicability (1)Definitions (1)Adult patients (1)Pregnant women (of any gestation including up to 6 weeks after birth) (2)Paediatric patients (2)Neonates (2)Education and training (2)Early Warning Score Procedure Clinical staff responsibilities (3)Clinical staff responsibilities (3)1.Recognition: Activation (3)2.Response: Escalation (3)munication / handover/ transfer of care requirements (4)Measurement / Evaluation (4)Associated material (4)CDHB Resources: (4)Healthlearn (4)Appendix One: NZEWS Zone calculator (5)Appendix two: CDHB NZEWS site specific response pathways (6)Appendix three: EWS decision tree (10)Appendix four: Modified Early Obstetric Warning (MEWS) Management Protocol Score and management/response (11)Christchurch Women’s Hospital (11)CDHB Primary Community Maternity Units (Ashburton, Lincoln, Kaikoura, Darfield, Rangiora) (12)St. George’s Maternity Unit (13)Appendix five: Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) Management Protocol Score and management / response (14)Appendix six: Guide of When to use the New-born Observation Chart and NEWS (15)。
基于计算机视觉和XGBoost_的虾体活力检测

湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版) 2023,49(2):218–222.DOI :10.13331/ki.jhau.2023.02.015 Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences)引用格式:冯国富,汪峰,陈明.基于计算机视觉和XGBoost 的虾体活力检测[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,49(2):218–222.FENG G F ,WANG F ,CHEN M .Shrimp vitality detection based on computer vision and XGBoost [J].Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences),2023,49(2):218–222. 投稿网址:基于计算机视觉和XGBoost 的虾体活力检测冯国富1,2,汪峰1,2,陈明1,2*(1.上海海洋大学信息学院,上海 201306;2.农业农村部渔业信息重点实验室,上海 201306)摘 要:以南美白对虾为研究对象,提出一种基于计算机视觉和XGBoost 的虾体活力检测方法:跟踪对虾应激前后的运动轨迹,提取运动行为特征参数;根据应激性红体现象提取对虾的颜色特征,通过灰度共生矩阵(GLCM)提取虾体应激形成水面波动的纹理特征;运用XGBoost 算法筛选出评价因子,通过加权融合确定评价因子的最佳权重;根据融合后特征对虾体活力强度进行检测。
结果表明,提出的方法决定系数为0.905 6,识别准确率为98.61%,较单一颜色、单一纹理以及光流与纹理相结合的方法,识别准确率分别提高6.63%、2.05%和1.61%。
关 键 词:虾体活力检测;计算机视觉;XGBoost ;特征融合中图分类号:TP391.41 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1007-1032(2023)02-0218-05Shrimp vitality detection based on computer vision and XGBoostFENG Guofu 1,2,WANG Feng 1,2,CHEN Ming 1,2*(1.School of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Fishery Information, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201306, China)Abstract : Based on computer vision and XGBoost, a method of shrimp vitality detection was proposed by taking Penaeus white shrimp as the research object. Firstly, track the movement trajectory of shrimp before and after stress to extract the movement behavior parameters. The color characteristics of shrimp were extracted according to the stressful red body phenomenon. Secondly, extract the texture characteristics of shrimp with water surface fluctuation forming under stress by using gray scale co-generation matrix, and use XGBoost algorithm to filter the evaluation factors, and determine the best weights of the evaluation factors by weighted fusion. Finally, the shrimp vitality intensity was detected according to the fused features. The results showed that the decision coefficient of the proposed method was 0.905 6 and the recognition accuracy was 98.61%, which improved by 6.63%, 2.05% and 1.61% compared with the single color, single texture and combined optical flow and texture methods, respectively.Keywords : shrimp vitality detection; computer vision; XGBoost; feature fusion收稿日期:2022–03–04 修回日期:2022–12–18 基金项目:江苏省科学技术厅项目(CX(20)2028)作者简介:冯国富(1971—),男, 河南鹤壁人,博士,副教授,主要从事嵌入式技术、图像处理研究,*****************;*通信作者,陈明,教授,主要从事水产物联网和数据挖掘研究,**************.cn虾体活力受环境因素的影响较大,对虾体进行活力检测,对虾苗的培育至关重要[1]。
基于自适应聚焦CRIoU_损失的目标检测算法

第 38 卷第 11 期2023 年 11 月Vol.38 No.11Nov. 2023液晶与显示Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays基于自适应聚焦CRIoU损失的目标检测算法肖振久1,赵昊泽2,张莉莉2,夏羽3,郭杰龙4*,俞辉4,李成龙2,王俐文2(1.辽宁工程技术大学软件学院,辽宁葫芦岛 125000;2.中国兵器工业集团航空弹药研究院有限公司,黑龙江哈尔滨, 150000;3.上海宇航系统工程研究所,上海 201100;4.中国科学院海西研究院泉州装备制造研究中心,福建泉州 362000)摘要:在目标检测任务中,传统的边界框回归损失函数所回归的内容与评价标准IoU(Intersection over Union)之间存在不相关性,并且对于边界框的回归属性存在一定不合理性,使得回归属性不完整,降低了检测精度和收敛速度,甚至还会造成回归阻碍的情况。
并且在回归任务中也存在样本不均衡的情况,大量的低质量样本影响了损失收敛。
为了提高检测精度和回归收敛速度提出了一种新的边界框回归损失函数。
首先确定设计思想并设计IoU系列损失函数的范式;其次在IoU损失的基础上引入两中心点形成矩形的周长和两框形成的最小闭包矩形周长的比值作为边界框中心点距离惩罚项,并且将改进的IoU损失应用到非极大值抑制(Non-Maximum Suppression,NMS)处理中。
接着引入两框的宽高误差和最小外包框的宽高平方作为宽高惩罚项,确定CRIoU(Complete Relativity IoU,CRIoU)损失函数。
最后在CRIoU 的基础上加入自适应加权因子,对高质量样本的回归损失加权,定义了自适应聚焦CRIoU(Adaptive focal CRIoU,AF-CRIoU)。
实验结果表明,使用AF-CRIoU损失函数对比传统非IoU系列损失的检测精度最高相对提升了8.52%,对比CIoU系列损失的检测精度最高相对提升了2.69%,使用A-CRIoU-NMS(Around CRIoU NMS)方法对比原NMS 方法的检测精度提升0.14%。
AX PRO Hub DS-PWA64-L-WE 产品说明书

Body Worn Solution
Entrance
Intrusion Detection
Applications
Entrance
Intrusion Detection
AX PRO Intrusion Detection
Conventional alarm verification: Give user phone call or send guard to end-user site to verify an event. New alarm verification: Send 7s recording video via app and email to end-user app or ARC to verify alarm event.
Solution Introduction
Hikvision’s School Security Applications are designed to increase safety and ensure that your School can make the students comfortable, with confidence and peace of mind.
Pharmacy
Indoor Panoramic Monitoring
Mini PanoVu Cameras
The best combination of panoramic and close-up images: precise details while covering every angle.
Access Controller
Only after a designated manager swipes their card will their staff’s cards be activated. First card authentication strategy helps to raise access control security levels.area and zoom into details. A maximum of one door can be opened at the same time, preventing tailgating.
专题05 阅读理解D篇(2024年新课标I卷) (专家评价+三年真题+满分策略+多维变式) 原卷版

《2024年高考英语新课标卷真题深度解析与考后提升》专题05阅读理解D篇(新课标I卷)原卷版(专家评价+全文翻译+三年真题+词汇变式+满分策略+话题变式)目录一、原题呈现P2二、答案解析P3三、专家评价P3四、全文翻译P3五、词汇变式P4(一)考纲词汇词形转换P4(二)考纲词汇识词知意P4(三)高频短语积少成多P5(四)阅读理解单句填空变式P5(五)长难句分析P6六、三年真题P7(一)2023年新课标I卷阅读理解D篇P7(二)2022年新课标I卷阅读理解D篇P8(三)2021年新课标I卷阅读理解D篇P9七、满分策略(阅读理解说明文)P10八、阅读理解变式P12 变式一:生物多样性研究、发现、进展6篇P12变式二:阅读理解D篇35题变式(科普研究建议类)6篇P20一原题呈现阅读理解D篇关键词: 说明文;人与社会;社会科学研究方法研究;生物多样性; 科学探究精神;科学素养In the race to document the species on Earth before they go extinct, researchers and citizen scientists have collected billions of records. Today, most records of biodiversity are often in the form of photos, videos, and other digital records. Though they are useful for detecting shifts in the number and variety of species in an area, a new Stanford study has found that this type of record is not perfect.“With the rise of technology it is easy for people to make observation s of different species with the aid of a mobile application,” said Barnabas Daru, who is lead author of the study and assistant professor of biology in the Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences. “These observations now outnumber the primary data that comes from physical specimens(标本), and since we are increasingly using observational data to investigate how species are responding to global change, I wanted to know: Are they usable?”Using a global dataset of 1.9 billion records of plants, insects, birds, and animals, Daru and his team tested how well these data represent actual global biodiversity patterns.“We were particularly interested in exploring the aspects of sampling that tend to bias (使有偏差) data, like the greater likelihood of a citizen scientist to take a picture of a flowering plant instead of the grass right next to it,” said Daru.Their study revealed that the large number of observation-only records did not lead to better global coverage. Moreover, these data are biased and favor certain regions, time periods, and species. This makes sense because the people who get observational biodiversity data on mobile devices are often citizen scientists recording their encounters with species in areas nearby. These data are also biased toward certain species with attractive or eye-catching features.What can we do with the imperfect datasets of biodiversity?“Quite a lot,” Daru explained. “Biodiversity apps can use our study results to inform users of oversampled areas and lead them to places – and even species – that are not w ell-sampled. To improve the quality of observational data, biodiversity apps can also encourage users to have an expert confirm the identification of their uploaded image.”32. What do we know about the records of species collected now?A. They are becoming outdated.B. They are mostly in electronic form.C. They are limited in number.D. They are used for public exhibition.33. What does Daru’s study focus on?A. Threatened species.B. Physical specimens.C. Observational data.D. Mobile applications.34. What has led to the biases according to the study?A. Mistakes in data analysis.B. Poor quality of uploaded pictures.C. Improper way of sampling.D. Unreliable data collection devices.35. What is Daru’s suggestion for biodiversity apps?A. Review data from certain areas.B. Hire experts to check the records.C. Confirm the identity of the users.D. Give guidance to citizen scientists.二答案解析三专家评价考查关键能力,促进思维品质发展2024年高考英语全国卷继续加强内容和形式创新,优化试题设问角度和方式,增强试题的开放性和灵活性,引导学生进行独立思考和判断,培养逻辑思维能力、批判思维能力和创新思维能力。
benefits of FMEA in the development process of sof

Software FMEAOpportunities and benefits of FMEA in the development process of software-intensive technical systemsOliver MäckelSiemens AGSimulation and Risk ManagementCT PP 281730 MünchenTechnical systems are prevalent in many areas of our society. Nowadays they often include a considerable amount of software. Identification and avoidance of technical risks is of major importance in the development of these software-intensive technical systems. A powerful analysis technique in the development process for technical systems is the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). This technique has proved very effective in avoiding failures in many areas of industry. However, there is to date no widespread use of the FMEA technique for software-intensive systems. Objectives and benefits of carrying out FMEAs on software will be discussed along with advantages, areas of application, weaknesses and constraints.IntroductionTechnical systems are prevalent today in many areas of our society. Due to economic rationalization and the necessity to meet increased requirements regarding performance and ergonomics an ever-growing number of complex tasks are being automated. An increasing dependence of society on the safe and reliable operation of these systems is the consequence. As an example, a faulty ticket vending machine is certainly a nuisance for the user and may also lead to substantive damage. The unintentional inflation of an airbag without any underlying vehicle collision on the other hand could lead to serious injury or even fatalities. The catastrophic failure of an on-board aeroplane computer could lead to great loss of life.Today technical systems often contain considerable amounts of software, which already constitutes an essential part of the system. It is a fact that new motor vehicles these days contain nearly 50 computer systems [1]. Extremely high safety and reliability levels are required of these mainly software-intensive systems. Examples can be found by considering costly capital equipment, especially aeroplanes and rail vehicles. High safety and reliability levels are also required for mass-produced products such as motor vehicle components, for industrial automation equipment etc [2]. These requirements necessitate, especially under the consideration of increased time-to-market and cost-to-market pressure, a risk-oriented development for software-intensive technical systems.Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisThe Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) [3, 4] is an important analysis technique in the development process of technical systems. It was developed by NASA in the USA [7] in the early sixties for the Apollo Project. In the automobile industry it is standard procedure for planning and development [8]. In other areas of industry [9] FMEA can be found as a methodological component of quality management. The FMEA is acknowledged to the industry in many ranges [8, 9, 10].In a preventing way the FMEA takes failure behaviour and causes into consideration and evaluates associated risks with respect to occurrence, severity and detection. The simplicity and efficiency of the technique has proved its value and,furthermore it is recommended in relevant Standards [5, 6] for the development of safety-critical systems.FMEA for software (SW-FMEA) - Goals and BenefitsIn relation to hardware failure behaviour and human error it is gradually becoming more important to view the failure behaviour of software and its effects. This must be taken into account by the development of technical systems. FMEA is an established technique to avoid failures in technical systems. A timely performed FMEA is risk management instead of crisis management [15]. In the early phases of software development where the costs for changes are small (Fig. 1) and willingness to change is high, it makes sense to identify and avoid failures in a preventive way. By evaluating the individual risks a differentiation between high risk and low risk components, modules and functions can be achieved. This makes a risk-oriented development of software-intensive systems possible.relative number of faultsrelativ number of detected faultsCosts for faultcorrection per fault (TDM)Analysis Design CodingModul-testSystemtestField10%Fig. 1: Fault occurrence, fault elimination and fault correction costs in software development [15]A SW-FMEA is the consitent continuation of the FMEA of the system (system FMEA: SFMEA) for analyzing software-intensive components of the considered system. Their results find their way back to the FMEA of the system. However, the FMEA technique is not yet widely used for software-intensive systems. General use of these analyses in the development of technical systems is more important the more the requirements for time-to-market and cost-to-market increase.SW-FMEA!system as part of the FMEA of the system!during the softwareof critical functions!for the identification of critical modulsFig. 2: When should a SW-FMEA be performed?The SW-FMEA is a systematic, structured technique for the review of the software architecture or the software design with respect to technical risks (e.g. safety, reliability or availability). The SW-FMEA is used for knowledge transfer. The knowledge of different departments, like for example system development, software development, test and service, is brought together and used during the FMEA in the team. So the number of views on or into a system and a system's software increases itself.ProcedureThe SW-FMEA is carried out as a supplement to a FMEA of a system. It is used for architecture or design review during the development. The SW-FMEA should be performed before the implementation of the software. It may not be executed on software source code (Fig. 2).The SW-FMEA should also be executed in a team. This team has got members of different functional areas, like system development, software development, test and service.The SW-FMEA is carried out in following steps:1. The software to be examined is divided in components, modules and functions. A tree-similar structure develops.2. For every component defined in the system structure the function has to be described.The function of a subcomponent represents a partial function of the superordinate component.3. Corresponding possible failures and faults are assigned to every function of acomponent. The failure effects can be found then in the superordinate components. The failure causes are as a possible failure or fault listed in the subordinate components.4. If a risk evaluation is supposed to be carried out," the severity of the failure effects (in German: Bedeutung des Fehlverhaltens: B-value), " the probability of occurence (in German: Auftretenswahrscheinlichkeit: A-value) and" the detection probability of the failure causes (in German: Entdeckungswahrscheinlichkeit: E-value) will be listed.5. Then the definition of measures for the improvement of the software through avoidanceof possible faults or errors or the optimized detection of failures follows. This can happen for example through improved processes of development or through planning of special test cases. The evaluation of components, modules and functions with more or less risks follows on the basis of the quantitative risk evaluation.Due to the manifold connection possibilities of components, modules and functions a SW-FMEA should be carried out by the support of a FMEA tool [12]. The management of the SW-FMEA will be much simpler through that and the realization will get more efficient. DifficultiesIn the practice some weak spots during the realization of the SW-FMEA exist. In total the risk evaluation turns out in a more difficult way than in a conventional SFMEA. The experience shows that on the average larger risk priority numbers (RPN) are obtained. From a direct comparison of the risk priority numbers with conventional SFMEAs and/or between SW-FMEAs must be warned.Fundamentally two aspects which were criticized repeatedly within the framework of the conventional SFMEA [13] should be considered in particular at the evaluation of SW-FMEAs: " The derivation of thumb rules for the initiation of measures must even be project-specific or singlerisk oriented. Global use of thumb rules for the initiation of measures, as "for all risks with a RPN > 100 a measure has to be defined" are senseless [13] and proved to be useless in particular at SW-FMEAs." The same risk will be evaluated from different teams and/or different expert often differently. A comparison over several FMEAs must fail from that.Due to that a new procedure for the value formation at SW-FMEAs for the probability of occurrence (A-value) and the detection probability (E-value) is defined (based on a procedure discribed in [10]). The aim is an objective and usable risk evaluation.The evaluation of the severity (B-value) shall be done in analog mode to the SFMEA in order to receive continuously consistent evaluations.The occurrence and the detection takes off with software-intensive systems significantly from the complexity of the individual modules. At conventional SFMEAs the disturbance rate or probability of components out of the field are used within the risk evaluation for the determination of the A-value. For software this relation and transformation for the specific context must be determined first (Fig. 3). Test, verfication and maintenance strategies for thedetermination of the E-value are used in the conventional SFMEA. Test and review efficiency can be used useful to determine the E-value for software in combination with the respective module size or complexity (Fig. 4).modul complexityf a i l u r e o c c u r r e n c e f r e q u e n c ymodul complexityP r o b a b i l i t y o f f a i l u r e d e t e c t i o nFig. 3: Thumbsketch of a relation (probability of occurence / module complexity) including transformationto A-value Fig. 4: Thumbsketch of a relation (probability of detection / module complexity) including transformationto E-valueActually practical values may be determined at a SW-FMEA as follows. The evaluation of the occurrence and detection probability will be done in two steps. First an initial value has to be defined for the occurrence probability depending on the module complexity (Fig. 5).This will be reduced then depending on the process quality of the carried out avoidance measures. Individual avoidance measures are for example: " Structured analysis " Object-oriented analysis and design " Formal design methods " Design and coding standards" Standardized programming language " Validated compiler or even compiler which are well-proven in use The in each case used measure combination causes a more or less effective and efficient process. The reduction of the initial value depends on this.p r o c e s s q u a l i t y f o r t h e a v o i d a n c e o f f a u l t sp r o c e s s q u a l i t y f o r th e d e t e ct i o n o f f a u l t s a n d f a i l u r e s modul complexityMeasure should be initiated directlyFig. 5: Determination of the value for probability ofoccurance Fig. 6: Determination of the value for detectionprobabilityThe same procedure is used for detection probability value. First an initial value of 10 points is assigned independently from the module complexity (Fig. 6).Then this will be reduced depending on the process quality of the carried out detection measures. Detection measures for fault detection before system delivery are for example:" Formal verification" Reviews" Functional test (black box-tests) " Equivalence class tests" Static analysis " Data and control flow analysis" Structure-oriented tests with statement, branch or path coverage" Interface tests" Stress testsDetection measures for detection of failures during the systems runtime are for example:" Defensive programming" Failure Assertion ProgrammingThe influence for the enlargement of the fault detection is evaluated according to the used measure combination. The respective measure combination leads analog to the avoidance measures to a more or less effective process quality, by which the decrease of the initial value is defined.Definitively the risk priority number (RPN) is formed from the failure severity (B-value), the occurrence probability (A-value) and the detection probability (E-value).In this case the evaluation of the process quality turned out in a more difficult way than expected. The possible combinations of the measures are diverse and the corresponding benefit of a measure combination is only very heavily appraisable on an ordinal scale. Furthermore almost the same A and E-values were turned out for small software-intensive systems through almost identical measures or measure combinations for all failure causes. StrengthsThe SW-FMEA is simple and systematic. In an efficient way the SW-FMEA allows the structured analysis of a software architecture or a software design. With the aid of the SW-FMEA critical functions or modules and their risks will be identified systematically. This enables early a risk based development for example" through the organization of measures to avoid software faults," trough the initiation of measures for the detection of faults bevor the delivery or" the initiation of measures for the detection of failures during the runtime and" through the derivation of propositions for the optimization of the software structure.Risk based and disturbance based test cases and the appropriateness of tests and tests evaluates as soon as critical development instruments are worked out or identified.In addition to that maintenance rules in order to guarantee the safe and reliable operation of the software-intensive system within the specified environmental conditions are worked out permanently.ConclusionThe optimization of the software architecture and the software design and the derivation of test cases lead directly to an improvement of the software-intensive system. Since particularly these qualitative results stand in the foreground, the difficulties during the objective formation of values are negligible. Strengths and benefits of a SW-FMEA outweigh the difficulties from that.The SW-FMEA is well suitable as a systematic risk based review method.It forces the developer to a structured way of thinking.The software developer, who thinks during the development functionally, is forced, to think in an failure-oriented way.He has to build up the entire figure of the failure event from the effects down to the causes.In the analysis or design phase the respective system may be analyzed with respect to specific risk features by the use of a SW-FMEA. This is based on a systematic and structured dividing of the system.For safety-related software the derivation of safety-oriented, mostly failure-oriented test cases is just interesting. These are normally usable within the framework of a validation of the software or the system and increase next to the quality also the confidence into the developed software-intensive and safety-related systems.PerspectiveThe base forms a careful risk analysis and risk evaluation for the development of technical systems. The conversion of these analyses during the development of technical systems just wins more and more importance regarding to the rising time-to-market and cost-to-market requirements.Moreover, missing or unclear risks can lead to gaps in the further development process. This may lead to risks or hazards. The SW-FMEA helps by the capturing of the missing or unclear risk requirements related to software components.Due to the importance of the FMEA for general quality processes [8, 9, 10] and due to the demands from standards [5, 6,] the SW-FMEA will find in particular further circulation as a method for preventive failure avoidance. The systematic and structured procedure supports an architecture and design review just with regard to risk based questions.Next to the up to now described possible applications of the SW-FMEA in the analysis and the design phase the SW-FMEA can also be used effectively in the requirement analysis in the sense of a systematic risk based review of the requirements specification in order to increase the quality of the requirements specification [11]. Following advantages turn out in this case:" Early understanding of the requirements" Improvement of the communication between the author of the requirements specification and the software design team" Early recognition of mistakes in the requirementsFor big software-intensive systems the SW-FMEA will be recommended as a good method for the review of the requirements specification [11] in the same way.During the development of safety-critical systems in automotive industry, in aviation technology and in industrial automation the SW-FMEA will establish itself just the same as for availability-critical systems in the telecommunication.References[1] Jüttner, P., Schweikl, U., Siemens AT, SoftwareDevelopment in Automotive Business, Gast-vortrag Uni Oldenburg, Mai 2000[2] Liggesmeyer, P., Qualitätsicherung softwarein-tensiver technischer Systeme, Spektrum-Verlag Heidelberg, 2000[3] DIN 25448, Ausfalleffektanalyse (Fehler-Mög-lichkeits- und -Einflussanalyse), Mai 1990[4] IEC 812, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis[5] IEC 61508, Functional safety of electrical /electronic / programmable electronic safety-related systems[6] prEN 50128, Bahnanwendungen – Software fürEisenbahnsteuerungs- und Überwachungs-systeme, Juli 1998[7] Müller, D. H., Tietjen, Th., FMEA-Praxis - DasKomplettpaket für Training und Anwendung,Carl-Hanser-Verlag, München, 2000[8] Zebedin, H., FMEA aus Sicht eines Motorenent-wicklers, in: Qualität und Zuverlässigkeit, Vol.43, Nr. 7, Seite 826 ff., Carl-Hanser-Verlag,München,1998[9] Gralla, D.; Heinz, S., Fehlermöglichkeits- undEinflussanalyse FMEA, in: EI – Eisenbahnin-genieur, Vol. 49, No.74, S. 43 - 47, Juli 1998 [10] Schiegg, H.; Viertlböck, M.; Kraus, T.Prozeßbegleitend und frühzeitig - System-Produkt-FMEA mit objektiver Kennzahlbildungbei einem Automobilzulieferer, in: Qualität undZuverlässigkeit, Vol. 44, Nr. 7, Seite 879 - 884, Carl-Hanser-Verlag, München,1999[11] Lutz, R. R., Woodhouse, R. M., RequirementsAnalysis Using Forward and Backward Search, in: Annals of Software Engineering, SpecialVolume on Requirements Engineering, 1997 [12] Mäckel, O., Schuster, J.-U., Siemens ZT/A&D,Interner Bericht (A&D GT4/98-17): FMEAWerkzeugvergleich, München, November 1998 [13] Kistner, W., FMEA noch besser anwenden, in:Qualität und Zuverlässigkeit, Vol. 41, Nr. 7, S.827 – S. 830, Carl-Hanser-Verlag, München,1996[14] Möller, K. H., Ausgangsdaten für Qualitäts-metriken - Eine Fundgrube für Analysen, in:Ebert, C., Dumke , R. (Hrsg.) , Software-Metri-ken in der Praxis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996 [15] Mäckel, O., Mit Blick auf's Risiko - Software-FMEA im Entwicklungsprozess softwareinten-siver technischer Systeme, in: Qualität undZuverlässigkeit, Vol. 46, Nr. 1, Carl-Hanser-Verlag, München, 2001。
GEA 产品说明 - 关于 GEA CowScout 的功能和应用说明书
GEA COWSCOUTHeat Detection, Health Monitoringand Cow Positioning2GEA CowScoutComfortably and safely CowScout monitors your cows, so you do not have to: Around the clock, day and night.CowScout reliably tells you when your cows are ready for insemination. Convenient alert functions ensure that you never miss an activity report. A sensor on the neck monitors the cow’s movement at all times. It shows you any periods of high activity for each individual animal and, if you wish, even its live location. This gives you an excellent basis for successful fertility and health management!FERTIBLE TIMES WITH HEAL THY COWSReduce reproduction costs and optimise your cow management while simultaneously increasing the economic success of your milkproduction.3CowScout works 24/7 to monitor cow activity by identifying neck movements, such as sniffing and chin resting that indicate if a cow is in heat.With this real-time data, cows in heat can be properly identified, so you and your employees always have the latest information about your cows‘ fertility. This allows for improved insemination results, higher pregnancy rates, shorter calving intervals and reduced insemination costs – all with lower labor inputs.SUCCESSFUL REPRODUCTIONIdeal fertility management – precise and reliable4GEA CowScoutExample: Heat detectionAt first, a suspicious alert (based on 2 x 2 h increased activity) was generated for the cow, which later changed to an alert for actual increased activity (based on 3 x 2 h increased activity). The green bar indicates the optimum insemination time. Here, the cow should have ideally already been inseminated.All cows in heat at a glance7 Days5CowScout detects specific movement patterns related to forage intake, recording the time individual cows spend eating. It also records when the animal is regurgitating food and resting peacefully to measure her rumination time. Changes in eating and rumination behavior as well as measurements of activity versus inactivity, may indicate potential health problems. The alert function tells you immediately if the cow is exhibitingKEEP FEEDING UNDER CONTROLfeeding or health problems so that you can react quickly and appropriately. Having both eating and rumination time data allows you to identify sick cows at an earlier date – helping to minimise treatment costs and drops in milk production. The best basis for a hearty appetite and long-term high performance!Exact datawith inactive times offers the most accurate data for early detection ofhealth problems.24/7 Monitoring of Cow Behaviour6GEA CowScoutOptimise your feed managementExample: Individual eating timeThis cow is spending a significantly reduced amount of time eating compared to previous days and has therefore caused an alert. An immediate professional check of this cow, which calved recently, identifies the early stages of ketosis. As the cow is treated immediately, it can recover quickly.Example: Group eating and rumination timeA group of cows is spending less time eating. Rumination decreased and inactivity increased indicating an error in feed composition. The farmshould adjust the TMR ration.7With an internet connection and your PC, laptop, tablet or smartphone, you can gain an insight into your current reproduction data as well as eating and rumination times of your animals.If desired, CowScout can send the respective alerts directly to you, your staff or insemination technician via e-mail. This ensures that all parties always have the latest information.ROUND THE CLOCK EVERYTHING AT A GLANCE8GEA CowScoutCowScout I With integratedanimal ID function for connecting to a herd management system.CowScout SFor operations without a herd management system or where electronic animal ID systems are already in place.The right system for every farmStraight from the animal to the screen – Access the latest data on your mobile devices.• Constant heat monitoring and display of the optimal insemination time• Notification of reduced eating and rumination times to enable early detection e.g. of health problems • Reliable animal identification in the milking parlour, selection system and feeding box with proven and reliable ISO technology• Stand-alone system for flexible use independent of the ISO ID• Internet connection means that data can be accessed anytime and anywhere• Clear, easy to understand graphical displays of activities, eating times and lactation phases in the web portal9Finally, the search is over.With the help of transmitters mounted above the cows‘ heads inside the barn and the corresponding neck tags, CowScoutcontinuously detects the location of each cow.The larger the herd, the more time it takes to find individual animals in the barn – but that only applies if you do the search yourself. Instead, let your CowScout positioning system do the work for you and get rid of time-consuming walks through the barn. Thanks to precise localization, each of your cows is just a click away. Immediately, the cow’s position appears visually in your barn overview. Here you can select a specific animalnumber or an entire group - depending on what is currently Do not lose any time, find the right cow at the touch of a button: CowScout keeps an eye on your entire barn and knows 24/7 where each cow is located.COWSCOUT FINDS THE RIGHT ONE…on the agenda. Be it due to an upcoming insemination appointment, a necessary examination and veterinary treat-ment or an activity message that requires your attention: This way, you as well as your employees, the inseminator and the veterenarian can find the right cow at exactly the right time. Because after all, you don‘t want to lose any time when it comes to animal welfare and milk yield!11Fast and convenient: CowScout transmits the exact position of single or multiple cows in real time! Follow each cow live as it makes its way through the barn. Whether using a PC, tablet or smartphone – on your screen you can keep an eye on the whole herd//you have the full overview on your screen.With just one click, you will see the animal numbers out of your activity list in the barn map. So if a cow needs your attention, you no longer need to walk through the entire herd looking for it. You will directly find the right one. Pleasant side effect: This also means less stress for the cows!…AND TRANSMITS HER LOCATION IN REAL TIME.12GEA CowScoutThe cow‘s live location of at your fingertips• Simplifies daily work and saves time: find one or multiple cows with just one click• Convenient and clearly arranged: display of cow position on the barn map including animal number • Flexible and mobile: access via PC, tablet orsmartphone• Fast and accurate: faster reaction when action is needed while reducing stress for the cows• User-friendly and easy to handle: employees, inseminators and veterinarians can use the system on their own• Fully integrated: practical functions in line with heat detection and health monitoring 1314GEA CowScoutBrad Payne, New Zealand…Every cow is tagged with CowScout and automatically drafted when on heat or showing abnormal eating activity. You can’t argue with data; it’s been key to better efficiency and more days in milk.“15。
Exabeam 模块化 SIEM 平台商品介绍说明书
The modular Exabeam platform allows analysts to collect unlimited log data, use behavioural analytics to detect attacks and automate incident response with two deployment paths to choose from - augmentation, enhancing current SIEM solutions,and replacement, a swap out of the entire existing platform. A predictable and scalable cost model, price per user as opposed to data ingestion.Behaviour based analytics for anomaly detection enables complex use case detection, such as Insider Threat and Compromised Credentials.Automatic Host-to-IP user mapping stitches all log data together to give a comprehensive view of user and entity activity.Automatically built smart timelines created to increase analyst productivity and reduce time to answer.The ability to augment and enhance the capabilities of existing and legacy SIEMs using Exabeam's Advanced Analytics.Incident Response automation with Case Management and Playbooks.A Modular Platform which allows for a phased SIEM migration.Exabeam differentiate themselves from the competition with:Everything on a network generates a log whenever it performs an action. A SIEM tool ingests and collates these logs in an organised and presentable way. Analysts can then use this data and Exabeam's UEBA to detect threats and remediate with a lower time to action.You need to find the people who care about logging costs,analyst productivity and infrastructure efficiency. Go as high as you can because the final decision is made or approved at the executive layer or CISO.You'll often find that more than one department is involved in the purchase, so nurture your relationship across departments:Department VPs/Directors - IT Security (IT Security Architect), InfoSec, Network IT/Security (Network Security Architect), DLP (DLP Manager), Risk & Compliance, Information RecoverySIEM has the 3rd largest industry budget behind Firewall and EndpointThe SIEM market is expected to reach $3.7billion by 202368% of attacks go unnoticed for monthsTARGET MARKETTHE BUSINESS NEEDSIEM/UEBA TOOLCustomers with legacy SIEM vendors Customers with no SIEM/UEBA Customers with over 1000 users Customers with busy networks, generating large numbers of logsWhat does a SIEM/UEBA tool do?WHO SHOULD YOU BE TALKING TO?SAVE MONEY ON LOGGINGIMPROVE THREAT DETECTIONINCREASE ANALYST PRODUCTIVITYExabeam is a market leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for both SIEM and UEBA. They are the 2nd fastest company to go from start up, to topright (behind Palo Alto Networks). Exabeam have also won the ‘Gartner Customer Insight Award’ two years in a row. This is a highly coveted awardthat is voted for by end prospects themselves and is based on direct feedback.Competitors include:Splunk, QRadar, AlienVault, Microsoft Sentinel, McAfee Nitro, LogRhythm, ArcSight, RSA, Secureonix and Forcepoint.CROSS-SELLOPPORTUNITIESDISCOVERY QUESTIONSDo you currently have a SIEM/Log Collector? If so, what?Do you currently have a SOC? If so, is it managed in-house? Howmany SOC/general analysts do you have looking at this?How many IT Users do you have/number in your AD? (If you havemultiple accounts but one user, we only look at the user).What cyber threats are you concerned about?What security projects are on your roadmap?What security toolsets are you using/any cloud apps?Competition - who else are you considering?What's your biggest concern with not having a SIEM in place/thatyou're not getting from your SIEM today?1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8."I already have a SIEM""We have analysts who sit in the SOC and manage this"We can also augment SIEM using our UEBA offering. Improving threatprotection by detecting threat correlation rules cannot find and removea heavy number of false positives. Would you like to explore thisoption?If analysts were able to work more efficiently and utilise their timeacross more projects – would that be useful to you? How do theyprioritise alerts to ensure they’re looking at attacks as opposed tofalse positives? Exabeam’s smart timelines can automate the manualprocesses and increase your analysts' productivity.How does Exabeam compare to the competition?Exabeam vs. Splunk and QRadarLegacy SIEM with volume based pricing, poor UEBA toolSplunk's pricing is based on data ingestion which creates large,unpredictable bills without appropriate value. Only Exabeam uses aflat, user-based pricing model so customers can log unlimitedamounts of data for a fixed price.Splunk doesn't have any response capabilities. No timelines, noAPI based orchestration or playbooks. Slower and morecumbersome process that Exabeam's automated collation.Long POCs that require heavy manual handling with high intensitylogs.Little detection value from UEBA offering.Legacy SIEM now platform focused; UEBA as a feature; resilientfor responseQRadar's pricing is based on data ingestion which creates large,unpredictable bills without appropriate value. Only Exabeam uses aflat, predictable, user based pricing model so customers can logunlimited amounts of data for a fixed price.UEBA based on correlation rules resulting in heavy false positives.Running UEBA often requires additional hardware at an additionalcost.Incident response based on IBM Resilient - low degree ofautomation focused on ticketing and compliance and industryspecific reporting rather than incident response automation.1400+ Vendor Integrations:Data Lake tools e.g. Splunk, QRadarEPP/EDR tools e.g. SentinelOne, CrowdstrikeVisibility tools e.g. Ixia, ForescoutFirewalls e.g. Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, CheckpointDLP e.g. Symantec, WatchGuard, Forcepoint。
Behaviour detection
until vehicle collision with the respective characteristic points based on the computed velocities and the directions that the respective extracted characteristic points move in the image. Distant characteristic points are designated based on the computed TTCs, and moห้องสมุดไป่ตู้ements of the distant characteristic points are monitored in order to detect pitching and yawing of the vehicle.
申请人:Nissan Motor Company Limited 地址:2 Takara-cho Kanagawa-ku Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa 221-0023 JP 国籍:JP 代理机构:Holmes, Matthew William 更多信息请下载全文后查看
专利内容由知识产权出版社提供
专利名称:Behaviour detection 发明人:Sano, Yasuhito 申请号:EP 0625284 5.0 申请日:20060601 公开号:EP1729260A3 公开日:20100623 专利附图:
摘要:A behaviour detector and a behaviour detection method for a vehicle. A controller extracts multiple characteristic points out of an image captured using a camera and computes the velocities and the directions that the respective extracted characteristic points move in the image. Then, the controller computes the times (TTC)
考研词汇—近20年统计
整理了词频大于9的所有单词。
下载后自己根据需要在手机上看。
detection 241. N-UNCOUNT 不可数名词觉察;发觉Detection is the act of noticing or sensing something. 【搭配模式】:oft N ofn...the early detection of breast cancer. 乳腺癌的早期发觉2. N-UNCOUNT 不可数名词发现;查出Detection is the discovery of something which is supposed to be hidden. 【搭配模式】:oft N of nThey are cheating but are sophisticated enough to avoid detection. 他们在作弊,但因为手法老练没有被发现。
3. N-UNCOUNT 不可数名词侦查;侦破Detection is the work of investigating a crime in order to find out what hashappened and who committed it.The detection rate for motor vehicle theft that year was just 11.7 per cent... 那一年机动车盗窃案的侦破率仅为11.7%。
The most important deterrent for most criminals is the likelihood of detection and arrest. 对大多数罪犯来说,最大的威慑力量是警方可能会破案并将他们逮捕。
carbon 231.N-UNCOUNT不可数名词碳Carbon is a chemical element that diamonds and coal are made up of.2.N-COUNT可数名词复写纸 A carbon is a sheet of carbon paper.∙He inserted the paper and two carbon s.他放入了那张纸和两张复写纸。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
2. Related Work
Intrusion detection for local area networks is a well established research area. In 1990, the Network Security Monitor [9] was one of the first intrusion detection tools that implemented the “connection counter” algorithm of the University of California in Davis. This algorithm is used to identify infected hosts and is based on the observation that worm infected hosts normally open connections at higher rates than uninfected ones. Monitoring bandwidth usage on network links and alerting upon reaching a threshold by statistical-based intrusion detection systems is similar to our traffic class cardinality tracking but less accurate.
1. Introduction
As we currently approach one billion Internet users [14], more and more cyber criminals join in and misuse this worldwide network by setting free malicious worm code that infects hosts and aggressively spreads over the network. Surprisingly, many large operators of Internet backbones still do not see enough incentives for deploying security elements and for analysing their network traffic proactively in near real-time for new massive security incidents like worm outbreaks. Security in the Internet is mostly regarded as being the duty of the network users that should protect their end systems by a firewall and a virus scanner.
Based on the observation that hosts infected by the same worm execute the same code for scanning and transferring exploit and worm code, we assume that during a worm outbreak the network behaviour of many hosts will suddenly change in a similar way. In this paper, we propose a novel near real-time method for early detection of worm outbreaks in high-speed Internet backbones. By analysing backbone traffic at flow-level, we can attribute various behavioural properties to hosts like ratio of outgoing to incoming traffic, responsiveness and number of connections, which all are strongly influenced by a worm outbreak. These properties are used to group hosts into distinct classes according to their current behaviour. We show that by tracking the cardinality∗ of these classes for significant changes over time, worm outbreak events can reliably be detected and a set of potentially infected hosts can be identified.
∗“Cardinality” denotes the number of hosts in a single class.
(c) 2005, IEEE WET-ICE/STCA
Intrusion detection in backbone networks is a rather new research area. For worm detection in the global Internet, methods based on distributed intrusion detection systems like NetBait [6], firewall logs, or honeypots or a detection method using ICMP error messages [2] have been published. Most detection methods proposed for local area networks require packet payloads, which are expensive to collect and process in high-speed networks. Even analyses of real worms in backbones are extremely rare due to the required large efforts of handling such data and due to privacy concerns. In the DDoSVax [7] project, we analysed major Internet worm outbreaks in the AS559 backbone obackscatter traffic of the Code Red, Slammer and Witty worms collected in a large unused IP address space with their Network Telescope [13]. Our proposed method is based on flow-level information of backbone routers and does not need packet payloads. Worm detection in backbones is a challenge: It has to be efficient for large traffic volumes, and there is no detailed information such as installed software about the active hosts, which e.g. is strongly relied on by many commercial intrusion detection systems for local area networks.
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich {duebendorfer, plattner}@tik.ee.ethz.ch
Abstract
We propose a novel near real-time method for early detection of worm outbreaks in high-speed Internet backbones. Our method attributes several behavioural properties to individual hosts like ratio of outgoing to incoming traffic, responsiveness and number of connections. These properties are used to group hosts into distinct behaviour classes. We use flow-level (Cisco NetFlow) information exported by the border routers of a Swiss Internet backbone provider (AS559/SWITCH). By tracking the cardinality of each class over time and alarming on fast increases and other significant changes, we can early and reliably detect worm outbreaks. We successfully validated our method with archived flow-level traces of recent major Internet email based worms such as MyDoom.A and Sobig.F, and fast spreading network worms like Witty and Blaster. Our method is generic in the sense that it does not require any previous knowledge about the exploits and scanning method used by the worms. It can give a set of suspicious hosts in near real-time that have recently and drastically changed their network behaviour and hence are highly likely to be infected.