斯坦贝克文学风格的几个特点

斯坦贝克文学风格的几个特点
斯坦贝克文学风格的几个特点

斯坦贝克文学风格的几个特点Some Features of Steinbeck’s Literary Style

系(院)名称:

专业班级:

学生姓名:

指导教师姓名:

指导教师职称:

年月

Table of Contents Introduction (1)

Chapter 1 the Subjective and Objective Factors and Aesthetic Basis of Steinbeck's Novels (2)

1.1 The Literary Edification of Good Family (2)

1.2 Rich Experiences of Steinbeck’ Life (4)

1.3 The Great Humanistic Care of John Steinbeck (6)

1.4 Innovative Consciousness (8)

Chapter 2 John Steinbeck's Novels' Pursuits of Aesthetic (10)

2.1 Epic-styled Themes (10)

2.2 Non-teleological Method (11)

2.3 Typical Characters (11)

Chapter3 Aesthetic Techniques of John Steinbeck's Novels (13)

3.1Effective Contrasts (13)

3.2 Poetic Languages (13)

3.3 Implicit Endings (14)

Conclusion (16)

Bibliography (18)

斯坦贝克文学风格的几个特点

摘要:作为一位在世界文坛上有广泛影响的作家,毫无疑问, 我认为斯坦贝克不懈追求和奋斗精神,贯穿其四十余年的全部创作活动之中,体现在作家创作的每一部成功以及不太成功的作品之中。大半个世纪对斯坦贝克小说的研究充满了争议,直到今天分歧仍然很大。本来,文学批评见仁见智,不足为奇,可以说是不可避免的。但是,这里夹杂着许多文学的因素,非文学的因素,同时也带有许多误解的成分,所以不能客观实事求是地对待作家及他的作品。特别是对于像斯坦贝克这种前后创作风格变化颇大的作家,如果根据某一部作品或某一时期的作品就判断或衡量该作家整个创作的美学价值跟文学特点,必然会失之偏颇。本文通过对斯坦贝克小说特点较为全面而深入的探讨,力图向读者揭示斯坦贝克小说从技巧到内涵上的独特魅力,对斯坦贝克小说的文学特点给予较为客观的揭示与分析。约翰·斯坦贝克的许多作品以美国的土地和人民为题材。他替穷苦人说话,为被压迫者申辩。他的小说刻划了富于同情心和人情味的真实可信的人物形象,展现了他们生活时世的广阔壮丽的图景。

关键词:斯坦贝克,美学价值,小说,人物形象,文学特点

Some Features of Steinbeck’s Literary Style

Abstract:As an influential writer in the literary. I'm sure Steinbeck had worked very hard in his writing career for forty years. This spirit can be reflected in his every work, successful or not. The research on Steinbeck's novels is full of controversy for over half a century until today. It is no surprise that literary artist have different opinions. This situation is complicated in which involves many elements of literature and non-literary factors, even a lot of misunderstanding. As a result, the writer and his works did not receive objective and realistic treatment that will be biased to determine the literary characteristics of aesthetic value. Especially for Steinbeck, whose writing style changed greatly, it is not fair to just and decide the aesthetic value and literary feature according to one specific work or work in one specific period. This thesis attempts to explore the features of Steinbeck's works deeply and through analysis of his writing techniques and contents. John Steinbeck's many works are about the land and the people of the United States. He spoke for the poor people, and defend foe the oppressed. In his novel he depicts compassionate and humane authentic characters, demonstrating their lives in the magnificent picture in the world wide.

Key words: Steinbeck, aesthetic value, novel, characters, the literary characteristics of aesthetic value

Introduction

John Steinbeck (1902-1968) is a prolific and versatile writer, he has written over thirty books which spread over a wide spectrum. The Grapes of Wrath (1939), Tortilla Flat (1935), Of Mice and Men (1937), and East of Eden(1952),and even some of his less known books have been widely read by the general public both at home and abroad. His works include novels, short stories, plays and journals. Although the basic setting for most of his works is in California, his home state, the topics in his writing range from culture, politics, war and science to society itself. He was awarded various honors, including Pulitzer Prize (1940), and Nobel Prize (1962). In the 1960s, literary critics began to focus on Steinbeck's works and their interest in Stein beck grew as time went on. As a result, the International John Steinbeck Society and Stein beck quarterly were set up. Till now, Steinbeck's novels have been translated into 33 languages and The Grapes of Wrath was translated into Chinese as early as in 1943.Nowadays, all his important saga novels, novelettes and short stories have Chinese versions (no collected edition in China yet).

Chapter One the Subjective and Objective Factors and Aesthetic

Basis of Steinbeck's Novel

1.1 The Literary Edification of Good Family

"The writer is delegated to declare and to celebrate manpower capacity for greatness of heart and spirit-for gallantry in defeat, for courage, compassion and love. In the endless war against weakness and despair, these are the bright rally flags of hope and of emulation. I hold that a writer who does not believe in the perfectibility of man has neither dedication nor any membership in literature". This is what John Steinbeck said when he received the Nobel Prize in 1962.

It seems that Steinbeck's being famous is incredible. But, if we study further, we'll find that it is not accidental for Steinbeck to acquire such splendid accomplishments. It has its inevitable subjective and objective, factors. In this chapter, we will try to trace the aesthetic origins of Steinbeck's novels from the following aspects, i.e. good family literary edification, rich life experiences, great humanistic care, profound local complex and strong innovative consciousness.

Steinbeck's f ather is a county treasurer and his mother is a teacher. His mother’s interest in literature deeply affects her children. Steinbeck also inherits the love for Ancient Greek and Roman classic works from his mother. Behind his parents' direct influence is the indirect influence of his grandfather, Samuel Hamilton. Though when this old man died in 1904, Steinbeck was still an innocent child, his affection for "good books" deeply affected all his children and grandchildren.

The good family atmosphere of reveling in books could be traced clearly back in his later literary magnum opus "East of Eden". What has made little Steinbeck more rejoiced is the fact that this scholarly family has a library of abundant collected books, in which there house history books, novels of the 19th century, children's adventures and religious literary books. Just as what Steinbeck's Sister Elisabeth recalled, "In Steinbeck's house there were plenty of books which were within our

reach." "We could choose the books freely and no one compelled us to do so, regardless of approval or disapproval.” (Demotte, 1984:12)

The little Steinbeck was so crazy in reading books that he recalled, "Some books, such as Crime and Punishment (Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1821一1881),Madame Bovary(Gustavo Flaubert, 1821一1880) and The Return of the Native (Thomas Hardy, 1840-1928) are much truer than the things I've experienced. I have read these books when I was very young, but I didn't regard them as books, but as the things that were happening around me." The influence of the family literary edification during his boyhood on Steinbeck's creation can be found here and there in his works. In Steinbeck's later novels, his achieved grand themes, symbolic meanings and poetic languages have extraordinary connections with this book. In the preface to his novel Tortilla Flat, Steinbeck writes that, "For Danny's house was not unlike the Round Table and Danny's friends were not unlike the knights of it."(Steinbeck, 1935:7) The Bible is not only a religious classic, but also an ancient literary classic, which has incomparable influence on Steinbeck's creations. Many titles of the works created by Steinbeck are derived from the Bible. East of Eden is named after the story of Abel and Cain in the Garden of Eden. In his masterpiece The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck not only gives its name after the connotative meanings of "Grapes" in The Bible, but also derives rich nutrition from the stories of The Bible to moisten his own creations. When people see the picture of farmer Tom's whole family crowded in a jalopy transferring to the West from Oklahoma after bankrupting, they can't help thinking of the story of Noah's Ark in The Bible. The milk of the Bible permeates into most works of Steinbeck.

Shakespeare is one of the greatest playwrights and poets in the world, and his 37 plays and 154 sonnets have already become the precious gems in literary world. In those letters to friends, Steinbeck often speaks of Shakespeare and the, nutrition he has absorbed, from Shakespeare's works. If we further review Steinbeck's works, we'll find that the grand themes, poetic languages and the mixed experiments of multiple artificial forms, techniques and styles that he has pursued during his whole life all have a close relationship with Shakespeare's deep influence.

In a word, the family literary edification is the irreplaceable precondition and basis of Steinbeck's later literary success.

1.2 Rich Experiences of Steinbeck’ life

The reason why Steinbeck could make so remarkable achievements is due to his close contact with life and rich life experiences, which have given him dryness creative sources, hearty creative inspirations and enthusiasms.

Steinbeck was born in the countryside of California. When he was young, he had a long-term contact with cattle farmers, farm hands, fisher folks and towns' folks, so he was very familiar with the sceneries of his hometown and knew well of the rough guys. Between 1919 and 1924, he studied marine biology at Stanford University, but did not take a degree because he’ always planned to be a writer. Several of his early poems and short stories appeared in the university publications. During those five years, he often left off his studies and made a living by himself. In 1925, he went to New Y ork, intending for literary creations. Making unsuccessful attempts to publish stories, he worked both as a newspaper reporter and a laborer, and returned to California in 1927. In California he worked as a ranch hand, a fruit picker, a pharmacist, a land surveyor, a sailor, and a house watchman successively. It is the long-term close life contact with the lower lives that has made him take the rough guys' lives as his creative themes. As he becomes famous and walks into the upper society, Steinbeck still insists on going deep into the rough guys' lives to gather news and do some investigations, keeping in close contact with common people and the society.

We all know that beauty is life. Anything that reveals life or makes us think of life is beautiful. Before he wrote The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck has published two farm workers' novels, In Dubious Battle and Of Mice and Men. While he was writing these two novels, he found many new problems in the close contact with the farm workers. "By 1935, the great wave of dust bowl migration was displacing many, though by no means all of the migrants, non-white laborers in California fields. Before writing The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck has studied and experienced the

difficult life of the Dust Bowl migrants in California intensely over a period of time. The Dust Bowl days, also known as "Dirty Thirties", lasts about a decade.

In the course of composing the novel, Steinbeck wrote to Elizabeth Otis, admitting that there was a "difficulty" for him, since "I am trying to write history while it. Is happening and I do not want to be wrong." (Fang, 2000:81) This is the kind of personal emotional impact that Steinbeck seeks to achieve in his work in order to influence public opinion. To a large extent, it enables Steinbeck to gain the authority of representing history and power. After 5 months' hard working, an epic-styled novel "The Grapes of Wrath" emerged in the world. Commenting on his own work, Steinbeck says, "I have set down what a large section of our people are doing and wanting, and symbolically what all people are doing and wanting."(Ibid. 81) In this respect, The Grapes of Wrath is not merely a testimony to the particular history of 1930s' America, but itself part of it. Furthermore, it is a revelation of all human experience as well.

Whenever the Great Depression (1929-1939) is mentioned, people couldn't help referring to Steinbeck, because Steinbeck is always regarded as one of representative writers of that period. The whole 1930s is the unbearable years in American history. The Grapes of Wrath is the representative fiction of that period, which is often called by some critics "Uncle Tom's Cabin" of the Great Depression. It is due to Steinbeck's own real experience in that period that has made him write such a great book.

Immediately after the publication of The Grapes of Wrath, it aroused a national dispute, the focus of which was on the authenticity of the novel's theme. Nearly two months later, a publishing company published a new book named The Grapes of Joy, in which it describes how a family receive extensive cares and live a happy life after they migrates to California. Anthony West, in his New Statesman review, was uncompromisingly hostile in his rejection of the book. It was, he wrote, "a ho rrible story." and it had "great defects as a novel." (West, 1939: 404-405) Some councilman of Okalahoma criticized in the Congress that Steinbeck had "distorted the reality and the book was a complete fabricate story". The broadcasting station also released two different views. The film company carried out a spot investigation before screening

the film and finally found that the plight of the migrants were much more serious than what Steinbeck had described in his book. (Lisca, 1958: 149,155) In 1940, Mrs. Roosevelt visited the migrants' camps in person and said, "I always think this book isn't exaggerating." President Roosevelt also interviewed Steinbeck, after which the American government began the investigation of the farm workers' lives and working conditions. Just imagine that if Steinbeck only gets some information from others, or only skims over the surface without going deep into the real life, it is impossible for him to produce such an influential historical great work as The Grapes of Wrath. Furthermore he would have lost all his reputations because of falsification.

Steinbeck knows well that as a writer, it is important to keep in close contact with the people on the land. All these experiences are added fuels to his imagination, without which, Steinbeck feels all the things would be abstract, isolated and sterile. Not long after finishing his last novel, 58-year-old Steinbeck, accompanied by his beloved dog, drove a truck alone to make an on-the-spot investigation throughout America. His purpose of doing that is to get new "fuels" and to regain his youth.

Seeing through Steinbeck's whole life, we can say that Steinbeck is deeply rooted in the soils of life and in return the life moistens his creations.

1.3 The Great Humanistic Care of John Steinbeck

Steinbeck was born in the countryside of America and he had intimate contacts and natural connections with the rough guys. Before he became famous, he was engaged in businesses as a carpenter, a farmer, and a porter and so on, and lived with the working people day and night. After becoming famous, he still kept in close contact with the rough guys while he was engaged in writing and working as a journalist. In 1930s, America experienced serious economic crisis, during which the landlords took the chance of taking back the leased lands and sold them to banks and agricultural industrialists. Under the ruthless shoving of the tractors and the cruel repressions of local policemen, crowds of farmers' houses were destroyed and their lands were lost. They had to leave their native places and moved a long way to the West, hoping to find a job to support their families, but only found them in a more

woeful predicament. Steinbeck discerned this catastrophe of human world and exclaimed loudly, "About 5,000 families are starving to death, actually not starving, but starving to death ... I'm concerned about this matter at the very beginning, so I must go there to see the scene with my own eyes, to see what I can do to help crackdown these murderers ... After I've done that those old guys of farmers group would peel off the skin of me."(Wellston, 158) In 1952, when he was interviewed by the broadcasting station of VOA, he said, "While I was writing The Grapes of Wrath, my heart was full of hatred for those people who tyrannize others." (DeMott, 1989) Steinbeck poured his anger into his pen, forming lines and lines of furious "bill of complaints":

And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate-died of malnutrition-because the food must rot, must be forced to rot.

The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze, and in the eyes of the people there is the failure, and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.(Steinbeck, 1939:238)

After the publication of The Grapes of Wrath, the problem of "farm workers" immediately attracted the attention of the whole country. On one side, this book

aroused the panics and rages of those who stood for the agricultural capitalists' interests. They spared no efforts to assault the untruthfulness of the book and it was listed as the "forbidden book" by three states. The American Federal Bureau of Investigation even regarded Steinbeck as the main investigated target. On the other side, this book was warmly received by many readers, and gained the supports of some progressive forces and some wise persons in the government such as Mrs. Roosevelt. In 1962, when Steinbeck was standing on the Nobel Prize stage for literature, he proclaimed to the whole world that it was the writer's responsibility to disclose those painful mistakes and failures, to save people from the dull and dangerous nightmares, and to make them exposed under the light of the day. It is due to his great humanistic care and high sense of responsibility that Steinbeck has written many famous novels such as In Dubious Battle, Of Mice and Man, The Pearl and so on. He presents the common people's gory tribulations before the world, and carries out his promise of being the prolocutor for the poor through his practical actions. In The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck proclaims the following ideas by recurring to Tom Joad, hero of the novel, "Then I'll be all around' in the dark. I'll be ever where-wherever you look……An' when our folks eat the stuff they r aise an' live in the houses they build-why, I'll be there. "(Steinbeck, 1939:289)

From the above analysis we can say that it is Steinbeck's great humanistic care for rough guys that have made him -concern much with the poor and produce many magnificent epic-styled works as The Grapes of Wrath.

1.4 Innovative Consciousness

In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, he says, “…If a writer doesn't firmly believe humans can reach perfection, he will not be qualified for a writer, and will have no place in the literary world..." (Zhu, 1994:582) Steinbeck fulfills his views on creation through his continuously innovated practice.

According to different subjects, In Dubious Battle, Of Mice and Man, and The

Grapes of Wrath are classified as "Farm Workers Trilogy". But when we read this "trilogy", we find that there are no feelings of having seen them before or similar to some other novels regardless of their plots, scenes or characters. Actually, we just feel that it is like entering a beautiful garden, where the innovative charms of Steinbeck's novels are.

Chapter Two John Steinbeck's Novels' Pursuits of Aesthetic

2.1 Epic-styled Themes

To convert all those conditions and basis into successful works, the writer must have made various hard efforts and explorations in aesthetic pursuits. In this chapter, we will try to discuss Steinbeck's aesthetic pursuits from the following aspects, i.e. epic-styled themes, imperishable beliefs, Non-teleological methods and typical characters.

The novel The Grapes of Wrath is one of the most enduring works of fiction by any American author. "Written during the Great Depression, it describes a typical story of that time, the migration of a dispossessed family from the Dust Bowl Oklahoma to California." (Li, 2000:60) It tells a specific story of the Joad family, featuring the hardship and oppression suffered by migrant laborers during the Great Depression. It is an explicitly political statement that champions collective action by the lower classes and chastises corporate and banking elites for shortsighted policies meant to maximize profit while forcing farmers into destitution and even starvation. The story of the Joads is an epitome of all the migrants. They are enhanced in their consciousness through the experiences of their exodus. Without The Grapes of Wrath, American literary history will regrettably lack such kind of resplendent book.

Great epics are born of grand themes, and great epics can only be produced by upright, responsible and talented writers who have paid much attention to the activity, taken part in the activity and understood the activity intensively. From the above reviews, we can see clearly that Steinbeck has a long-term and clinging pursuit for the epic-styled themes and that Steinbeck can create epic-styled works is not accidental, but inevitable.

2.2 Non-teleological Method

The Theory of Non-teleology was once very popular among western literary writers. Its claims are close to naturalism and it holds that what the thing really is less important than the thing's existing. Steinbeck once declared that he approved of and carried out this theory in his literary creations and the world of critics had paid much attention to it. They thought what Steinbeck concerned was how the thing happened, but not why it happened. Steinbeck admitted that he recorded a true matter in the novel of Snakes, but he didn't know what that matter really meant. He was attracted by the Theory of Non-teleology. According to this theory, he writes Of Mice and Men, a naturalistic fable-like novel, which is originally titled as "Something That Happened". (French, 1995:81-82) Under this Theory, his series of novels, including the "Farm Workers Trilogy" are regarded as naturalistic works by the critics and Steinbeck is treated as a naturalistic writer.

In 1939, just before the publication of The Grapes of Wrath, it was said that a bookstore keeper had been examined by the FBI. In Sancatos City, Steinbeck's name was reported to the local- police office. Under such kind of giant white shadow, Steinbeck's intention was obvious to declare his Theory of Non-teleology in literary creations. He is just to show that his .writing is beyond utilitarianism, and he has no political intention at all.

Facts prove that Steinbeck's works are seemingly purposeless and naturalistic, but behind the purposelessness, there exists certain purposefulness, which has moved millions of readers and made his works become the precious gems in American and world literary treasury.

2.3 Typical Characters

When Edmund Wilson, an American critic, relates to some animals often appear in Steinbeck's works, such as rabbits, dogs, turtles and mice, he criticizes, "Mr. Steinbeck's novels always wrote about some immature characters of or close to animals' level... What Steinbeck did was not to improve the animals to the level of humans, but lower the humans to the level of animals... Why Steinbeck's characters

were always not that successful? I think it was due to his this kind of inclination of animalization." (Lisca, 1958:6) The other is the simplification of his character depiction. Some other critics think that "Steinbeck is not like Faulkner, who can excavate characters' ideological activities, and he can not disclose the characters' inner world through their conversations and opinion, what plays the decisive role in his creations is the theme of the novel. Real matters, compact plot arrangements, characters' diathesis requirements impel the writer to adopt this kind of method and style.

To judge whether this method is successful or not, we can't simply decide from the exterior or interior characters' depictions. We should make sure whether the depicted characters are suitable to the theme of the novel and whether they have vivid personalities. We should not evaluate a writer's achievements only from his methods and types of the character depiction. Actually, Steinbeck has depicted many characters from the interior in East of Eden and The Winter of Our Discontent, showing that Steinbeck could not only create some "flat characters", but also some unforgettable "rounded characters".

Chapter Three Aesthetic Techniques of John Steinbeck's Novels

3.1 Effective Contrasts

As one of the famous writers in the literary world, Steinbeck is distinctly unique from other American novelists in the application of aesthetic techniques between lines. Through studying Steinbeck's novels, we find that why Steinbeck's novels have been well-received among the general public is mainly due to his being able to catch the important historical events incisively and reflect these events objectively. In addition, through applying some useful artistic techniques, Steinbeck not only makes his novels truly reflect the real life, but also touch people's aesthetic sentiments and enlighten people's thinking deeply. In this chapter, we'll discuss the artistic techniques respectively.

Steinbeck is skilled at making and applying various contrasts. In his novels, the technique of contrasts is widely and ingeniously used, which complements with each other while opposing to each other. The application of mutual comparison and sharp contrast between those two relative objects has made the novels' themes more profound, the structures more prolific, the images of the characters more vivid, the scenes more touching and the aesthetic effects more prominent. In Steinbeck's novels, we can see various contrasts, such as the contrast between the righteous and the evil, the contrast between, beauty, tragedy, ugliness and comedy, the contrast between wisdom and stupidity, the contrast and the contrast between feelings and scenes.

The conflict between the good and the evil is the consistent theme of Steinbeck's novels, while the contrast between the righteous and the evil is the keynote of his works. The technique of contrast is applied in many aspects, which seems more prominent in East of Eden.

3.2 Poetic Languages

Poetic language is one of the most important aesthetic characteristics of Steinbeck's novels. The poem-quality seems to have been melted in his blood and it has made him capable of creating beautiful narrative and lyric language freely.

According to some materials, we find that the creation of Steinbeck’s poetic language has an intimate relationship with his two habits in writing. The one is that when he meets some obstacles in writing, he would write poems, since poem is the mathematics in writing and a close relative to music. Steinbeck thinks it's a splendid and valuable secret to have helped him create so many beautiful works.

The other one is that when he is writing, he likes listening to music. Music gives him inspirations and endows him with sentiment, which is good to his writing and a day's working rhythm. What is more important is that classic music has supplied canonical, harmonious and lyric analogy for his novels. Steinbeck is good at arranging his works' layouts and language patterns according to music's rhythms, so the languages of his novels have the characteristic of music or poems, which has been one of the writing techniques used in Steinbeck's novels.

Steinbeck keeps in a long and close contact with the low lives and has a deep understanding of their languages. Together with his poet and musician's temperament and genius, his In Dubious Battle, Of Mica and Men and The Grapes of Wrath have been regarded as the highly developed colloquial language form.

The poetic languages have strong attractions to readers. The syntactic arrangement adds to the beauty of the language and reinforces the aesthetic effects of his novels, making Steinbeck's style different from other writers'. That's why his novels have been so popular throughout the United States of America.

3.3 Implicit Endings

We all know that O.Henry is good at writing peculiar and unexpected endings. Steinbeck also pays much attention to the endings in his novels. Though his endings are not so peculiar and unexpected as "O·Henry-styled Endings", he has left vast spaces in the ending layouts, making his endings meaningful. Steinbeck's endings can not only arouse readers' brown study and unlimited reveries, but also mobilize readers' imagination. Apart from that, the endings of Steinbeck's novels can also arouse readers' various hypotheses and debates on the meanings, and at the same time play an irreplaceable role in deepening the themes, adding the connotations and improving the

tastes of the novels. Therefore, we call Steinbeck's peculiar endings as "Implicit Endings." Here is an example listed below.

The Grapes of Wrath (1939) this novel is about the story of a large number of bankrupted farmers who flee from famine during the 1930s' Economic Crisis, the theme of which is the transition of the bankrupted farmers from "I" to "We". In the story, when the Joads are finally forced to transfer to a shabby tool shed in the storm, they find a man who is too hungry to eat bread. After a haste discussion with her daughter Ruthie, who has just given birth to a dead baby and still has some milk, Ma drives away the other people.

She herded them through the door, drew the boy with her; and she closed the squeaking door. For a minute Rose of Sharon sat still in the whispering barn. Then she hoisted her tired body up and drew the comfort about her. She moved slowly to the corner and stood looking down at the wasted face, into the wide, frightened eyes. Then slowly she lay down beside him. He shook his head slowly from side to side. Rose of Sharon loosened one side of the blanket and bared her breast. "You got to," she said. She squirmed closer and pulled his head close. "There!" she said. "There." Her hand moved behind his head and supported it. Her fingers moved gently in his hair. She looked up and across the barn, and her lips came together and smiled mysteriously. (Steinbeck, 1939:311)

It seems that this ending is not finished. Actually it is, because Steinbeck's ending is an implicit ending, which calls up the readers to finish it. Ma's noble-minded spirit has been inherited by her daughter, Rose of Sharon and the "I" to "We" theme of the novel is fully embodied and echoed.

We will say that Steinbeck's implicit endings can not only help readers get more complicated, prolific and profound connotations about his novels, but also give artistic appeal to them.

Conclusion

In the previous chapters, we have traced the aesthetic origins of John Steinbeck, explored his unremitting pursuit in the aesthetic field, and discussed the aesthetic techniques applied in his novels. Now it should be possible for us to come to a conclusion.

As to the aesthetic origins, it consists of several aspects: firstly, it is the good family edification that makes a fine literary basis for Steinbeck's later success; secondly, it is his close contacts with life that forms the inexhaustible source of inspiration in his literary creation; thirdly, it is Steinbeck's great humanistic care for rough guys that urges him to produce complex the epic-styled works about those people; fourthly, it is the profound local that adds much natural be to his works; and finally, it is his strong innovative consciousness that makes his works unique from other American writers'.

The aesthetic techniques, the uniqueness of Steinbeck's novels exists in his extensive application of thought-provoking symbols, effective contrasts, poetic languages and implicit endings. The various symbols used in his novels have not only helped readers to see the essence of the society, but also add to the aesthetic effects of his novels. His application of sharp contrasts not only helps create a great impact upon readers, but also urges the readers to ponder over the serious social problems. His syntactic arrangement of the language not only makes his language poetic, but also reinforces the aesthetic effect of the whole novel. The implicit endings leave vast space for readers' imagination and give artistic appeal to them.

文学概论名词解释1

文学概论 名词解释 1、精神生产:指的是人类为了取得精神生活所需要的精神资料而进行的对于自然、社会的 观念活动。(第100页) 2、灵感:是作家在内心长期积累、比较、分析材料,艰苦地思索以至达到寝食俱忘的程度 之后,突然在无意之间获得的一种可能性的结果。(第137页) 3、直觉:是作家凭借过去的知识积累,过去的经验,已有的、炉火纯青的判断能力和推理 能力,并与目前所专注的思想趋向、情绪趋向等相结合,对某种事物(或现象)做出的突破性顿悟。(第138页) 4、艺术真实:是作家在假定性情境中,以主观性感知与诗艺性创造,达到对社会生活的内 蕴,特别是那些规律性的东西的把握,体现着作家的认识和感悟。(第161页) 5、艺术概括:是作家依据自己的体验和认识,以主题的审美价值追求能动介入方式,对富 有特征的事物给予独特艺术处理,从而在主体与客体相统一的基础上,创造既有鲜明的独特个性又具有相当普遍意义、体现着一定审美价值取向的艺术形象之方法。(第162)6、人文关怀:是一种崇尚和尊重人的生命、尊严、价值、情感、自由的精神,它与关注人 的全面发展、生存状态及其命运、幸福相联系。(第170) 7、艺术形式:是语言材料及各种艺术手段的有机组合,是艺术内容的组合、生成与呈示, 是艺术文本的存在形态,是文学审美价值的实现方式。(第179) 8、艺术构思:是作家在材料积累和艺术发现的基础上,在某种创作动机的驱动下,通过回 忆、想象、情感等心理活动,以各种艺术构思方式,孕育出完整的、呼之欲出的形象序列和中心意念的艺术思维过程。(第132页) 9、俄国形式主义:产生于20世纪20年代,其主张是:认为能够成为文学作品的东西是它 的“文学性”,“文学性”就在于它的形式,主要是语言形式,而与作品中的社会历史内容无关,代表人物是艾亨鲍姆。(第175页) Ps:俄国形式主义不知道正确与否,是自己通过书上的话提炼出来的。

电影和文学作品

收集的资料至少包括以下几个内容:书名;作者生平;所处环境与成文风格及他们的相互作用;作品梗概;中心思想;社会意义;风格流派及艺术成就;人物关系图;主人公人物形象分析;段落赏析;名词妙句摘抄;与此有关的电影电视剧话剧的影视信息及对比评价 第一部分:中国文学 呐喊 野草 雨天的书 新月诗选 家 雷雨 骆驼祥子 边城 呼兰河传 围城 传奇 十四行诗 穆旦诗全集 茶馆 朦胧诗选 天下第一楼 .红高粱家族 海子诗全编 在细雨中呼喊 白鹿原 平凡的世界 穆斯林的葬礼 尘埃落定 芙蓉镇 长恨歌 蛙 许茂和他的女儿们 秦腔 第二部分:外国文学 莫泊桑中篇小说选 契诃夫短篇小说选 茨威格中篇小说选 堂吉诃德 哈姆雷特 歌德谈话录 普希金抒情诗选 巴黎圣母院 九三年 匹克威克外传

复活 樱桃园 我们 城堡 推销员之死 老人与海 等待戈多 金蔷薇 第二十二条军规 雪国 包法利夫人 红与黑 猎人笔记 第三部分:中国话剧 一只马蜂 获虎之夜 名优之死 关汉卿 雷雨 日出 北京人 原野 家 上海屋檐下 芳草天涯 屈原 蔡文姬 茶馆 战斗里成长 第四部分:中国戏曲-古典小说窦娥冤 救风尘 西厢记 裴少俊墙头马上 汉宫秋 陈州粜米 秋胡戏妻 沙门岛张生煮海 赵氏孤儿 倩女离魂 醒世恒言 镜花缘

说岳全传 梁山泊李逵负荆 临江驿潇湘雨夜 荆钗记 刘知远白兔记 拜月亭 琵琶记 好逑传 封神榜 初刻拍案惊奇 第五部分:外国戏剧 匹克梅梁 鳏夫的房产 玩偶之家 群鬼 朱丽小姐 温德米尔德夫人的扇子 三姊妹 万尼亚舅舅 天边外 榆树下的欲望 鸟 孪生兄弟 第十二夜 威尼斯商人 阿伽门农 俄狄浦斯王 美狄亚 哈姆雷特 奥赛罗 李尔王 麦克白 1.看一遍 2.在网上搜寻相关资料,如时光网,豆瓣的评论或介绍,加深了解 3.再看一遍 4.找高潮或特色段落拉片,仔细看 5.下载相应的导演的资料研究风格 6.完整地看第3遍,看哪些地方体现了导演的一贯的风格 7.搜寻导演其他片子进行对比 8.搜寻同类型或同题材的进行对比 9.下载该电影影评,不少于10篇 10.把所有资料汇总打印交给老师审阅等待下一步包装

文学的定义

[文学的定义(狭义)]文学是作家借助于虚构和想象,用语言塑造的艺术形象来表现他对人生的审美感受和理解的一种艺术样式。 [文学接受]文学作品具有潜在的审美意义,但不能自己释放出来,作品的审美意义有待于读者的阅读。文学接受就是要使文学文本的潜在的审美意义得以实现。只有通过文学接受,文学作品的价值才能得以实现。文学接受是文学文本的意义得以衍生的惟一环节。 [文学批评]有广义和狭义两种。广义的文学批评泛指对文本的一切阐释,从新书的评介到系统的理论研究都包含在其中。狭义的文学批评是一种在鉴赏的基础上,运用某种理论对文学文本及其相关的文学现象进行分析、研究和评价的阐释活动。 [文学欣赏]是一种积极接受。文学欣赏的积极性表现在,要求接受者在接受过程中注重感受、体验,要有与自身经验相关的感受、体认和想象。读者为满足审美需要,在理解文学作品的基础上,通过想象、联想、情感、思维、再创造等心理活动,以构成审美意象,实现对作品的理解并获得美感愉悦的精神活动。 [召唤结构]当代德国美学家伊瑟尔首先提出的一个接受美学的概念。文学文本所使用的语言是表现性或描写性的,于是形成了非文学文本所没有的不确定性与空白。正是这种不确定性和空白,形成了文学文本所特有的结构特征,这就是“召唤结构”。不确定性和空白的存在,使文学文本具有了召唤和推动读者参与文学创造、开拓想象空间的可能。 [期待视野]接受美学中的重要概念,姚斯将其称为接受理论的“方法论顶梁柱”,是指文学接受者事先拥有并作为标准或框架而带入接受活动的全部经验和知识积累,包括接受者从已读过的文学作品中获得的经验、知识,对不同文学形式和技巧的了解以及接受者的生活经历、文化水平、欣赏趣味等,它相当于心理学家皮亚杰发生认识论中的先在的“图式”。 [共鸣]通常包括两种含义:一是指在阅读文学作品时,指由于读者的思想情感,或经历遭际,与作家表达的作品中人物所具有的相通或相似,从而受到深刻打动,形成的一种强烈的心理感应状态;二是指不同的读者,包括不同时代、阶级和民族的读者,在阅读同一作品时,可能产生大致相同或相近的情绪激动和审美趣味趋同现象。 [文学形象]凡是能够将审美意识通过语言外化为使他人在接受过程中产生审美想象和联想的感性对象,都可称之为文学形象。文学形象有不同的类型,大体上分为三种:语象(非描摹性);形象(描摹型);意象(为表现思想感情而创造)文学形象的特点:间接性;心象性;概括性;符号性。 语象是由各种语言用法所创造的、非描摹性的、能引起读者具体感受和丰富联想的“语言形象”。语象是一种因语言修辞激发了人的想象,存在于感受中的形象。 狭义的文学形象,专指能够引发视觉联想和想象的描摹性形象,其特点在于通过语言的描绘,使人联想到某种物像。 意象在文学理论中,意象指的是为表现思想感情而创造的一种形象,即表意之象。“象”因“意”生,“象”为“意”的显现提供感性形态。 (教材P.33)文学形象的间接性是指,作为语言的艺术,文学形象不具有直接的现实性,用语言表现的形象只能以概念符号的形式呈现,需要通过接受者的想象和联想才可能间接地被感知。 (1)文学形象的间接性要求创作者和接受者都须在语言文字方面具备一定知识。 (2)文学形象的间接性还意味着接受者必须具备将概念性的语言文字转化为语象的能力。文学形象的心象性是指文学可以借助语言符号,把那些本身不具形体、难以捕捉的各种心理活动,如情绪、情感、思绪、感受等等,转化为可以感知的艺术形象。 概括性文学形象是具体的、个别的、感性的,但是又必须包含大于这种个别性和具体性的内涵,使其具有大于其本身的蕴意,即具有言外之意或象外之象。 形象不仅是文学的表现形态,而且也是文学传情达意的“语言符号”,具有所指性和隐喻

浅析汪曾祺文学作品的语言风格

浅析汪曾祺文学作品的语言风格 论文关键词:汪曾祺作品语言风格 论文摘要:汪曾祺是当代文学史上一位风格独特、具有独特地位的作家,也是一位深受读者欢迎的具有广泛影响的作家。汪曾祺的作品充分汲取了古典文学的营养,突破诗歌、散文、小说的界限,形成了其具有独特韵味的文学语言。本文以汪曾祺的小说散文为研究对象,拟探讨汪曾祺小说语言风格特色, 对于进一步理解汪曾祺文学作品有一定的帮助,也期待人们对汪曾祺语言有更深入的鉴赏和研究。 在当代文坛上,汪曾祺以自己珠玉般的篇什,显示了他那简淡恬适的个性气 质和古朴明净的传统风格,表现了驾御语言的高超功力和卓然不凡的语言风度。由于种种原因,汪曾祺并不算一位多产作家,然而,他那篇篇佳作赢得了人们的喝彩,尤其是他那幽兰清菊般的语言更是令人口齿留韵,难以释怀。汪曾祺同别人不一样之处,在于他接受过西南联大正规的高等教育,当属科班出身,且由于汪曾祺长期在北京从事文学和京剧戏曲的编辑和编剧工作,大大影响了他的小说语言,使他操成更为纯熟流利的京味儿普通话。而这京味儿又是最恰到好处的,它平添了文学的生活姿态和个性色彩,而绝无油嘴子之弊,令人感到朴素而不平板,流畅而不浮滑,自然本色,舒爽清新。 这种语言的功底和魅力显然得益于日常口语,方言,民间文学和古典文学的完美化合。汪曾祺将精练的古代语言词汇自然地消融在文本中,又从日常口语,方言,民间文学中吸取甘美的乳汁,兼收并蓄,克钢化柔,扫除诗歌、散文、小说的界限,独创了一种新文体。 一、口语化的语言

汪曾祺在《中国文学的语言问题》一文中曾经写道:语言是一种文化现象。语言的文化积淀越是深厚,语言的含蕴就越丰富。这种文化的积淀自古就有之,从《诗经》到《楚辞》,从唐诗宋词到明清小说,经过了几千年的积淀和蕴蓄,就形成了一种“书面文化”。这种文化可以增添文章的底蕴与深奥,让文章显得悠长而具有深味。与这种“书面文化”相对的则是一种“口头文化”,它是一种民间文化,可以是方言,也可以是我们平时所说的话。它集中就表现在通俗易懂,平易近人,与我们的现实生活很接近。他自己也说:我对民间文学是有感情的,民间文学丰富的想象和农民式的幽默,民歌比喻的新鲜和韵律的技巧使我惊奇不置。而当这种“口头文化”与“书面文化”一结合,就变得雅俗共赏,俗中见雅,既符合知识分子的阅读要求,也给平民带来了阅读的方便。下面就分析汪曾祺作品中口语的运用已到炉火纯青的地步。 “筷子头一扎下去,吱——红油就冒出来了。” 红油冒出来,本来只能观其形,用上“吱——”仿佛能闻其声,这一声“吱——”让食咸鸭蛋的过程变得有声有色,有情有趣。 “鸭蛋有什么可挑的呢?有!” 干脆利落的一个“有”,石破惊天的一个“!”,“以稚童的语气呼之欲出,真是世故到了天真的地步”(王安忆语)。 从上面的两个例子便可体会到,正如王安忆说过的“汪曾祺的小说,可说是顶容易读的了。总是最平凡的字眼,组成最平凡的句子,说一件最平凡的事情。”确实如此。王安忆又说:“汪曾祺讲故事的语言也颇为老实,他几乎从不概括,而尽是详详细细,认认真真地叙述过程,而且是很日常的过程。” 汪曾祺小说散文的语言特色重要表现为独特的口语化的语言。举个例子,“我家后园有一棵紫薇。这棵紫薇有年头了,主干有茶杯口粗,高过屋檐。一到放暑假,它开起花来,真是‘紫得’不得了,紫薇花是六瓣的,但是花瓣皱缩,

文学概论复习资料 (二)名词解释

名词解释 第一章文学观念 名词解释: 1、文学观念:文学观念就是对文学的看法,是对“文学是什么”的回答。文学观念是发展变化的。 2、文学四要素:当代美国学者艾布拉姆斯提出的,文学四要素是指世界、作家、作品、和读者。 3、再现说:在文学四要素中强调“世界”与“作品”的对应关系,即认为作品是对世界的摹仿或再现。 4、表现说:在文学四要素中强调“作品”与“作家”的关系,即认为作品是作家情感的自然流露、表现、传达。 5、实用说:在文学四要素中强调作品被读者所利用的关系,认为文学是一种工具,可以为某种社会目标服务。 6、客观说:在文学四要素中,把作品抬到高于一切、重于一切的地步,认为作品一旦从作家的笔下诞生之后,就获得了完全客观的性质,它既与原作家不相干,也与读者无涉,它从外界的参照物中孤立出来,本身是一个“自足体”,出现了所谓的“客观化走向”。 7、体验说:在文学四要素中强调读者对作品的意向性的体验这种关系,强调读者阅读作品是体验和现创造。 8、文学的定义:文学作为一种人类的文化形态,它是具有社会的审美意识形态性质的、凝聚着个体体验的、沟通人际的情感交流的语言艺术。 9、符号论的文化概念:从符号学的角度看,文化是人类的符号思维和符号活动所创造的产品及其意义的总和。这个观点是由德国的现代哲学家卡西尔提出的。 10、品质阅读:是指“试图尽可能完全地把握作品的肌质,表示首先注意到语言中的各种要素,重音和非重音,重复和省略,意象和含混等等,然后由此向人物、事件、情节和主题运动。这是就西语而言的,若是论汉语文学中…品质阅读”则是读者阅读是首先关注文本的用字、比兴、押韵、平仄、对仗和用事等,进一步再延伸到对情景的描写或人物、情节的叙述的理解。 11、经验和体验:个人和见闻和经历及所获得的知识和技能,统称为经验。所谓体验是经验中见出深义、诗意和个性的部分。经验是一种前科学的认识,它指向的是真理的世界(当然这还是常识、知识,即前科学的真理);而体验则是一种价值性的认识和领悟,它要求“以身体之,以心验之”,它指向的是价值世界。 12、文以载道:中唐时期韩愈等古文运动家提出的,经宋代理学家的解释得到完善,“文以载道”的意思是说文像车,道像车上所载之货物,通过车的运载,可以达到目的地。如果车装饰得很漂亮,却不载物,那么车再美也是无用的。可见文学也就是传播儒家之道的手段和工具。这样的文学观念偏重于文学的教化目的。 13、寓教于乐:古罗马时期的思想家贺拉斯提出。认为文学的摹仿要达到“既劝谕读者,又使他喜爱,才能符合众望”。这是一种既重视摹仿又重视读者的快感和教益的文学观念。 14、价值阅读:“价值阅读”表示阅读者“试图尽可能敏锐和准确地描述出他在作品中所发现的价值”。当然这里所说的价值,首先是文化价值。 15、审美:审美是心理处于活跃状态的主体,在特定的心境、时空中,在有历史文化渗透的条件下,对于客体的美的观照、感悟、判断。 16、情致:由黑格尔提出。情致是两个方面的互相渗透,一方面是个体的心情,是具体感性的,是会感动人的,另一方面是价值和理性,可以作为认识。但这两个方面完全结合在一起,不可分离。因此对那些情致特别微妙深邃的作品,它的情致往往是无法简单地用语言传达出来的。 17、虚静:中国古代文论概念。“虚静”就是使人的精神进入一种无欲无得失无功利的极端平静的状态,这样事物的一切美和丰富性就会展现在眼前。所以虚静可以理解为审美活动时的心理状态。 18、艺术真实性:艺术真实性是指文学作品的艺术形象的合情合理的性质。 19、出入说:王国维提出的。作家的体验不但要能“入”,而且还要能“出…:诗人对宇宙人生,须入乎其内,又须出乎其外。入乎其内,故能写之。出乎其外,故能观之。入乎其内,故有生气。出乎其外,故有高致。”入乎其内就是移情式体验,出乎其外,就是体验主体对体验的反刍。

小说《红高粱》和电影《红高粱》艺术特色分析 (11)

小说《红高粱》是莫言的代表作,电影《红高粱》是张艺谋的代表作,请运用所学习的文艺理论方面的知识,比较分析二者的艺术特色和成就,并着重分析电影《红高粱》对小说的继承和发展。 读完莫言的《红高粱》,脑子里便是那高亮的海洋,在八月的深秋里,一片血红,无边无际。 《红高粱》是最能反映莫言风格的一片奇作。小说以一块块的感觉画面组合而成,构成一个以独特感觉为基础的“红高粱”世界。从题材看,小说取材于家乡的抗日生活。在小说里,作者以家乡的红高粱作为背景,以活生生的感觉记忆为笔锋,游犁般地描述着家乡的抗日生活画面。与以往的“抗日文学”不同,《红高粱》摒弃了种种思想框框的制约,抹去了单纯乐观的色调,把家乡的抗日生活重新放置在民族的自然发展和充满血腥的历史过程中去。《红高粱》中充满对于人的个性和生命强烈的赞美。崇高生命的强力、赞美个性生命的伟大是莫言《红高粱》的主题,这个生命主题会使我们想到西方近代以来的生命哲学,个性是尼采那种高蹈的生命意志。在那里,莫言引出了一个关于“原始生命力”的主题。这一主题首先能够透过其描述的野生的“红高粱”这一富于象征寓意的意象而得以确立。这些野生的、蓬勃的“红高粱”,即使农民赖以生存的物质粮食,有时他们生存活动的现实空间。他们在高粱地里野合和打埋伏。“红高粱”蓬勃的野性和旺盛的生命力,成为北方中国农民的生命力的象征。 导演张艺谋拍摄的系列电影中都展现了他对于色彩艺术的独特见解和运用,通过色彩艺术将电影的主题思想进行传递和表达,也可以说导演张艺谋的电影之路就是其对色彩艺术的成功探索道路。电影中色彩艺术和民族特色的完美结合不仅刺激了观众的视觉神经,同时对于观众的审美情趣也产生了深远的影响,也将具有中国特色的电影艺术推到了国际舞台之上。电影《红高粱》是张艺谋早期重要的代表作,电影中独特的色彩运用艺术充分展现了张艺谋的艺术风格,本文将以这部电影为载体,对电影中的色彩设计艺术进行赏析和解读。电影中一个个油画似的场景,勾勒出了一个以红色为基调的“红高粱”世界,歌颂黄土高坡上的中华儿女抗日生活的电影,用来祭奠那些激荡在无边无际的如火如荼的高粱地里的

10、文学风格

第十讲文学风格 ________________________________________ 学习目标: 1.了解风格概念:风格界定;风格与创作个性;风格与话语情境;风格的特性; 2.了解风格的形态:简约与繁丰;刚健与柔婉;平淡与绚烂;谨严与疏放。 知识谱系: ________________________________________ 讲义: 一、风格界定 文学风格是文学作品的一种重要特性。是否有成功的和成熟的文学风格,是衡量文学作品的创作成就的一个重要标志。不同的文学风格有不同的审美价值,如阳刚、阴柔、简约、繁缛、典雅、朴素、幽默等都是美。风格既可以给人以形式上的满足,也可以陶冶人心。雄浑刚健的风格可以壮人胸襟,清新俏丽的风格可以舒人心脾,俊逸疏野的风格可以养人性情。高山瀑布、长桥卧波、芙蓉出水、皓月当空、平沙落雁、茂林修竹等,无不有其风格韵致,给人以独特的审美享受。但是,文学风格又是一个涉及面广泛而又十分复杂的问题,历来存在种种不同理解。 1.风格的词源辨析。在论述风格问题时,需要首先简单梳理风格一词的来源。西文的风格( style )一词源于希腊文,原义为木堆、石柱和雕刻刀等。希腊人取后一种含义,引申而指组成文字的特定方法,或写作和讲话的特定方式。这就是说,风格在西文里通常是指组成文字的特定方法、或写作和讲话的特定方式。 需要注意,“ style” 一词译成中文时,常有两种不同含义:一是指“风格”,二是指“文体”。这两个译法都注意到特定语言组织方式这一基本含义,但前者偏重于特定语言组织方式与人格或个性的联系,而后者偏重于特定语言组织方式本身。而在实际应用中,这个词的用法就更是五花八门,种类繁多,难以认同,而只能根据具体上下文(语境)去理解了。 2.风格本质和内涵的探讨途径。这里不妨梳理出两种不同探讨途径:一是从文学作品的语言形式方面理解风格,强调风格的语言修辞内涵。这在 20世纪形成了现代“文体学”(stylistics)。这一途径突出了作品语言形式对于风格的重要性,有其合理处,但忽视了风格中的人格内涵。二是从人的个性或人格在文学作品的语言组织中的投射去理解风格,突出风格与人的修养、气质和经历等个性特质的联系。中国汉代扬雄提出“言为心声”的观点,法国学者布封主张“风格即人”,都不约而同地把风格看成是人格的自然流露。这一途径不是突出风格与作品语言形式的关联,而是深探风格的人格内涵,显然有其合理性。但是,风格如果不与语言形式联系起来,却是难以说清的。需要综合这两条途径的长处,克服其各自的偏颇,而形成一条同时关注风格的语言内涵和其人格特征的综合途径。 3.风格的定义。什么是文学风格呢?文学风格是作家创作个性与具体话语情境造成的相对稳定的整体话语特色。风格有三个基本要素:创作个性、话语情境及特性。下面依次阐释。———————————————————————————————— 问:西文的“风格”一词的原义和引申义是什么? 答:西文的风格( style )一词源于希腊文,原义为雕刻刀,引申而指组成文字的特定方法,或写作和讲话的特定方式。 问:西文“风格”一词译成中文时往往有哪些不同用法? 答:西文“风格”( style)一词译成中文时,常有两种不同表述:一是“风格”,二是“文体”。这两个译法都注意到特定语言组织方式这一基本含义,但前者偏重于特定语言组织方式与人格或个性的联系,而后者偏重于特定语言组织方式本身。同时,在实际应用中,这个词的用法就更是五花八门,种类繁多,难以认同,而只能根据具体上下文去理解了。所以,对于“风格”一词需要具体分析。———————————————————————————————— 二、风格与创作个性 文学作品的风格总是同作家的创作个性紧密相连的。无论作品的语言形式如何复杂,作家的创作个性都必须从中以无可置疑的方式清晰地显现出来。创作个性,是文学风格的重要要素之一,是作家表现在作品中的个人性格特征。形成作家创作个性的因素很多,其中重要的有:世界观、艺术观、审美理想及艺术才能等。

自考文学概论名词解释及简答题

名词解释 实用说:从功能的角度界定文学,认为文学是道德和政治教化的手段。实用说肯定了文学的工具性,但在一定程度上忽视了文学独立的审美价值。 结构:是指先于个体存在的、体现了某种文化规范的语言形式,如语言规则、叙述模式、文体等。 互文性:是指任何文本的形成都与该文本之外的符号系统相关联,都是对其他文本的吸收和转换。 文学:是作家借助于虚构和想象,通过语言形象来表现他对人生的审美感受和理解的一种艺术样式。 文学形象:凡是能够将审美意识通过语言外化为使他人在接受过程中产生审美想象或联想的感性对象,都可称之为文学形象。 文本:文学文本是文学存在的现实形态,文本以书面语言或口头话语的形式使文学成为一个可以感知的实在对象。现代文论把它理解为一个独立自足的艺术世界,一个有待解释的开放对象。 诗歌:是一种语词凝练、结构跳跃、富有节奏和韵律、高度集中地反映生活和表达思想感情的文学体裁。 意境:中国古典诗学的重要范畴,指诗人的主观情意与客观物象相互交融而形成的一种重要艺术境界或审美境界,具有“境生于象而超乎象”的特点。 小说:用散文形式写成的、有一定长度的、虚构的叙事文体。 戏剧冲突:是指表现在戏剧中的、因矛盾双方的意志对抗或人的内心矛盾而造成的、能够推动剧情发展的矛盾冲突。戏剧冲突是戏剧艺术表现矛盾的特殊艺术形式,是戏剧性的集中体现。 文学思潮:是指在一定的社会文化思想的影响下,为适应社会变革和艺术创新的需要而形成和发展起来、并产生了广泛社会影响的文学思想潮流。 文学流派:是指一批作家因为在思想倾向和文学观念上有相近的见解,在创作实践上有共同的艺术追求,并以他们的创作实绩显示了相似的风格特色而形成的创作群体。 典型:即典型人物或典型性格,是现实主义叙事文学所创造的、在整体个性的表现中显示了某种社会历史蕴意的、具有高度审美价值的人物形象或人物性格。 浪漫主义:是一种以充满激情的艺术形象来表现理想追求、主观情感和某种社会心理的文学类型。 自然主义:是19世纪后期以左拉为代表的一种文学思潮,它是对于现实主义文学理论的一种片面、扭曲的延续和发展,主张以自然科学方法来观察和表现社会人生。 填空题 1.浪漫主义文学的“表现性”主要体现在“抒情性”和“个性化” 两个方面。 2.孔子谈论文学功能的著名观点是诗可以兴、可以观、可以

电影傲慢与偏见的语言风格特点分析

风格与特色 MOVIE LITERATURE 2012年第11期/电影文学 电影《傲慢与偏见》的语言风格特点分析 ■廖锦超 (玉林师范学院,广西玉林537000) [摘 要]语言是文学作品塑造人物形象的最为基本的手段,通过对电影《傲慢与偏见》呈现的语言特色中讽刺 诙谐艺术的分析,着重关注其人物对话描写艺术,如白描、反语、夸张等,进而研究作品中人物语言风格机智、 幽默、妙趣横生之谜以及赋予人物的性格特征。[关键词]《傲慢与偏见》 ;语言风格;特点分析电影《傲慢与偏见》是根据英国文学家简·奥斯丁(Jane Austen )的小说作品改编而成的,该片以家庭风波和婚姻嫁娶为题材,描写的是18世纪90年代体面人家的生活和交往。作品用看似平凡却繁琐、小天地折射大世界的笔调,将电影中的人物表现得栩栩如生,耐人寻味。在经历了两个世纪后,该作品仍影响深远,其重要的原因之一就是作者的语言功底深厚,简·奥斯丁刻画的人物对话鲜明生动,颇具个性,含义丰富,耐人寻味。本文尝试分析电影《傲慢与偏见》书中的人物对话风格,研究作品中人物对话语言风格机智、幽默、妙趣横生之谜。 一、讽刺意味浓厚, 善于用诙谐幽默的语言表现人物性格 在西方很多由小说改编的电影中,幽默成为一种常见而又特殊的语言现象。当然,幽默不单纯是引人发笑,更重要的是达到特定的语言效果,从而表现作者的创作风格。简·奥斯丁在《傲慢与偏见》中表现了其嘲讽与高超的幽默艺术。 电影情节上的戏剧性构思和嘲讽元素用得恰当好处。《傲慢与偏见》中,贝内特先生与自己的太太思想和言行上存在很大的分歧,简·奥斯丁在作品中并没有直接表明贝内特先生的态度,而是独具匠心地将贝内特先生与其夫人的思想矛盾融于故事情节的构思上 。“我看没有那个必要。你带着女儿们去就行了,要不索性打发她们自己去,这样或许更好些,因为你的姿色并不亚于她们中的任何一个, 你一去,宾利先生倒作兴看中你呢。 ”贝内特太太为了女儿的婚姻做准备,急于让自己的丈夫去拜访宾利 。“我很乐意,这是我们惟一的一点意见分歧。我以为,我们的意见在每点上都能融洽一致,可是说起……”贝内特先生早已对自己妻子的心思心知肚明,其回答不仅对妻子的急于求成的心态进行了一番嘲讽,同时也干脆表明了自己并不愿意主动去拜访宾利先生的意愿,即使情节发展到后来两个女儿对军官产生了浓厚的兴趣,贝内特先生仍旧说出了这样的话。 这种戏剧性的反讽构思,让现实对人们的主观臆想进行嘲讽。一开始,电影的主角达西认定贝内特家的家庭环境不好,很难找到有钱有地位的“好男人” ,而故事到最后恰好是他娶了伊丽莎白。而发誓不要嫁给达西的伊丽莎白, 最终还是做了达西夫人。还有电影中曾不可一世的咖苔琳夫人,为了不让伊丽莎白和自己的外甥达西结合,先是自己亲自出面,去威胁并企图呵斥伊丽莎白,后来又去劝说达西,可两人最后还是圆满地结合在了一起。更令人啼笑皆非的是,就在这几位“智者”受到现实嘲弄的同时,书中那位最可笑的“愚人”贝内特太太,最后却被证明是最 正确的 ,“有钱的单身汉总要娶位太太,这是一条举世公认的真理。 ”这种荒诞的真理的滑稽超越了一般意义上的是非观念,但也表现了作者对现实生活的深刻思考。 贝内特先生在电影中还有这样一段话 :“要是有年轻人来向玛丽或基蒂求婚,就让他们尽管来好了,我正闲着呢。 ”为了让自己的女儿找到真正的幸福,让她们开心快乐,当故事情节发展到伊丽莎白对贝内特先生表明对达西有深厚的感情后,贝内特先生被达西的所作所为感动,开始对达西有所改观,但他的情感的表达并没有直接表现出来,而是用幽默的语调来凸显出自己的态度,从而在含蓄中使得电影在整个结构上更具有情感的深刻性。 奥斯丁的讽刺艺术,不仅表现在众多情节的喜剧性处理上,还表现在许多人物的喜剧性格上。在电影《傲慢与偏见》中,人物语言对表现人物性格起到了至关重要的作用,让读者了解到了形形色色的电影人物。贝内特先生的语言就是其中很好的说明 :“她们哪一个也没有多少好称道的 ”“她们像别人家的姑娘一样,一个个又傻又蠢,倒是莉齐比几个姐妹伶俐些。 ”二、对话语言极具个性,为故事的情节推波助澜 对话描写是文学作品常用的基本艺术手段。一方面借助电影人物对话可以刻画个性化的人物形象,另一方面也可以为故事的发展埋下伏笔。简·奥斯丁善于在人物对话中制造多层次的人物性格,产生了言外之力,刻画出既鲜明生动、富有个性、含义丰富的人物性格,又表达了复杂的情感,烘托了主题,并奠定了幽默讽寓的基调。 在对话中塑造鲜明的个性特征,如电影《傲慢与偏见》 中设计了这样一段对话,达西 :“贝内特小姐,你是不是很想抓住这个机会跳一场苏格兰舞 ?”……“我压根儿不想跳苏格兰舞— ——现在,你是好样的就是蔑视我吧。”伊丽莎白回答道。后来达西也回答了一声 :“实在不敢。”当格莱小姐刚要谈起苏格兰小曲,达西趁机说了这样一句话,傲慢 074

文学风格论

第十三章:文学风格论 无论古今中外,大凡优秀作家的创作,总是有着鲜明的个性,表现出独特的风格;在一定的时期、地区,那些创作风格相似或相近的作家,又可能形成一定的文学流派;而那些具有较大势力的文学流派,则往往以其自觉的理论主张、艺术追求和创作实绩,在文学领域内掀起风靡一时、影响深远的思想潮流,这就是文学思潮。总之,文学风格、文学流派、文学思潮,乃是文学创作达到一定水平和境界所形成的重要现象。 一、文学风格的涵义 在文学史上,不同作家的作品在文风、趣味、情调、境界上往往是相去甚远、迥然不同的,李白与杜甫,一绮丽飘逸,一沉着典雅;鲁迅与郭沫若,一冷凝犀利,一淋漓 酣畅;巴尔扎克与雨果,一形象真切,一热情澎湃;米兰·昆德拉与萨特,一寓意深邃,一观念直露。而这一切,都是每个作家文学风格的表现。 中西方文论很早就开始了关于风格的研究。在古代希腊文和拉丁文中就有“风格”一词,在希腊文中该词表示那种长度大于厚度的直线体,其中有一个含义是指写和画所使用的雕刻刀;罗马人吸收了这一含义,扩展为技巧、手法、笔迹的意思,在古罗马作家特伦斯、西塞罗以及其他人的著作中,该词指组成文字的特定方式,进而指用文字装饰思想的特定方式。我国古代不大用“风格”一词,与之相对等的是风趣、风气、风神、滋味、格调等概念。 那么,什么是文学风格呢? 文学风格是一个带有总体性、全局性的概念,如果只是孤立地取出其中某一个方面、某一种因素而不及其余,势必不能得出正确的结论。 关于风格,有一个非常流行的说法,那就是18世纪法国学者布封在一篇名为《论风格》的演说中提出的“风格就是人”的命题,这一命题抓住了问题的要害,即风格必须以人为本,以人的主观精神修养为根柢,包括人的道德、品格、情感、胸襟、趣味等等。唯其如此,这一命题才赢得了后来许多人的认同,黑格尔说:“法国人有一句名言:‘风格就是人本身。'风格在这里一般指的是个别艺术家在表现方式和笔调曲折等方面完全见出他的人格的一些特点。”(黑格尔:《美学》第1卷,第372页。商务印书馆1979年版。)马克思也说:“我只有构成我的精神个体性的形式。‘风格就是人'。”(马克思:《评普鲁士最近的书报检查令》,《马克思恩格斯全集》第1卷,第7页。)我国古代文论中历来也有“文品即人品”、“文如其人”的说法,意思也大致接近,较早是扬雄在《法言·问神》中所说:“言,心声也。书,心画也。声画形,君子、小人见矣。”后来宋濂在《林伯恭诗集序》中说:“诗,心之声也。声因于气,皆随其人而著形焉。”叶燮在《原诗》中说:“诗之基,其人之胸襟是也。”刘熙载在《艺概·诗概》中也说:“诗品出于人品”。以上这些论述都表达了同样的意思,即文学风格乃是以作者主观的人格修养为根基,作者的人格修养常常能够在作品中表现出来,有什么样的作者,便会有什么样的作品,以何种人格修养作为根基,作品便会呈现出何种品位、趣味和格调。

浅析文学作品的语言风格

浅析xx文学作品的语言风格 在当代文坛上,xx以自己珠玉般的篇什,显示了他那简淡恬适的个性气质和古朴明净的传统风格,表现了驾御语言的xx功力和卓然不凡的语言风度。由于种种原因,xx并不算一位多产作家,然而,他那篇篇佳作赢得了人们的喝彩,尤其是他那幽兰清菊般的语言更是令人口齿留韵,难以xx。xx同别人不一样之处,在于他接受过西南联大正规的高等教育,当属科班出身,且由于xx长期在xx从事文学和京剧戏曲的编辑和编剧工作,大大影响了他的小说语言,使他操成更为纯熟流利的京味儿普通话。而这京味儿又是最恰到好处的,它xx了文学的生活姿态和个性色彩,而绝无油嘴子之弊,令人感到xx而不平板,流畅而不浮滑,自然本色,舒爽清新。 这种语言的功底和魅力显然得益于日常口语,方言,民间文学和古典文学的完美化合。xx将精练的古代语言词汇自然地消融在文本中,又从日常口语,方言,民间文学中吸取xx的乳汁,兼收并蓄,克钢化柔,扫除诗歌、散文、小说的界限,独创了一种新文体。 一、口语化的语言 xx在《xx文学的语言问题》一文中曾经写道:语言是一种文化现象。语言的文化积淀越是深厚,语言的含蕴就越丰富。这种文化的积淀自古就有之,从《诗经》到《xx》,从唐诗宋词到明清小说,经过了几千年的积淀和蕴蓄,就形成了一种“书面文化”。这种文化可以增添文章的底蕴与深奥,让文章显得悠长而具有深味。与这种“书面文化”

相对的则是一种“口头文化”,它是一种民间文化,可以是方言,也可以是我们平时所说的话。它集中就表现在通俗易懂,平易近人,与我们的现实生活很接近。他自己也说:我对民间文学是有感情的,民间文学丰富的想象和农民式的幽默,民歌比喻的xx和韵律的技巧使我惊奇不置。而当这种“口头文化”与“书面文化”一结合,就变得xx俗共赏,俗中见xx,既符合知识分子的阅读要求,也给平民带来了阅读的方便。下面就分析xx作品中口语的运用已到炉火纯青的地步。 “筷子头一扎下去,吱——红油就冒出来了。” 1 / 8 红油冒出来,本来只能观其形,用上“吱——”仿佛能xx,这一声“吱——”让食咸鸭蛋的过程变得有声有色,有情有趣。 “鸭蛋有什么可挑的呢?有!” 干脆利落的一个“有”,石破惊天的一个“!”,“以稚童的语气呼之欲出,真是世故到了天真的地步”(xx语)。 从上面的两个例子便可体会到,正如xx说过的“xx的小说,可说是顶容易读的了。总是最平凡的字眼,组成最平凡的句子,说一件最平凡的事情。”确实如此。xx又说:“xx讲故事的语言也颇为老实,他几乎从不概括,而尽是详详细细,认认真真地叙述过程,而且是很日常的过程。” xx小说散文的语言特色重要表现为独特的口语化的语言。举个例子,

文学概论 名词解释

文艺学:研究文学及其规律的学科。也称文学学。 文学史:是一门以研究主流文学为对象的,清理并描述文学演变过程,探讨其发张规律的一门学科 文学活动:把文学理解为一种活动,由作品、作家、世界、读者等要素组成,是人类的一种高级的特殊的精神活动 文学理论:对文学的原理、文学的范畴和判断标准等问题的研究 文学批评:以文学理论所阐明的基本原理概念、范畴和方法为指导,专门地去具体分析和评论一个个作家、作品 文学四要素:美国现代学者艾布拉姆斯在《镜与灯——浪漫主义文论及批评传统》中提出文学四要素理论,即作品、艺术家、世界、欣赏者 文学观念:文学观念就是对文学的看法,是对“文学是什么”的回答。文学观念是发展变化的。 再现说:在文学四要素中强调“世界”与“作品”的对应关系,即认为作品是对世界的摹仿或再现。 表现说:表现”说在“文学四要素”中强调作品与作家的关系,即认为作品是作家情感的自然流露、表现、传达 实用说:实用说在“文学四要素”中强调作品被读者所利用的关系,一般地说实用说认为文学是一种工具,可以为某种社会目标服务 独立说:主要强调文学是无关现实功利的独立的艺术形式的创造。与实用说相对立的观念,包括文学自律,艺术无功利,纯形式,纯审美。“为艺术而艺术”是这种观念的主要口号。 客观说:在“文学四要素”中,客观说把作品抬到高于一切重于一切的地步,认为作品一旦从作家的笔下诞生之后,就获得了完全客观的性质,它既与原作家不相干,也与读者无涉,它从外界的参照物中孤立出来,本身是一个自足体,出现了所谓的“客观化走向”。 体验说:体验说是文学四要素中强调读者对作口的意向性的体验这种关系,强调读者阅读作品是的体验和现创造。 文以载道:中唐时期韩愈等古文运动家提出,经宋代理学家的解释得到完善。“文以载道”的意思是说“文”像车,“道”像车上所载之货物,通过车的运载,可以达到目的地。如果车装饰得很漂亮,却不载物,那么车再美也是无用的。可见文学也就是传播儒家之“道”的手段和工具。这样的文学观念偏于文学的教化目的。

中国电影文学的传统与贡献

中国电影文学的传统与贡献 中国电影文学是伴随着中国电影及中国文学的成长而发展起来的,它经历了从幼稚到逐步成熟,从弱小到逐步强盛,从不受关注到逐步得到重视的过程,并在创作实践中形成了自己的传统。 中国电影诞生之初,并无事先写好的电影剧本。因最早的一批电影创作者均和文明戏有密切联系,所以他们把文明戏的创作方法带入电影创作之中,采用了简单的幕表制。1917年,上海商务印书馆开始试办电影制片业务。翌年成立了活动影戏部,较广泛地开展了制片活动。在活动影戏部简章中,已出现“征购脚本”和“脚本审核”等条目;而于1920年拍摄的《荒山得金》,其电影本事则是最早发表的短片电影本事,是电影剧本的雏形。商务印书馆兼营电影事业,是中国民族资产阶级对电影的首次关注。它拥有一定的资金和设备,还自建了摄影棚,是中国较有规模的自资摄制影片的开始。它对电影剧本的关注,也对电影文学创作的发展产生了一定的推动作用。 进入80年代以后,电影文学创作在开拓中持续发展,发表电影剧本的专门性刊物已多达十几种,且许多大型文学期刊,如《收获》、《十月》、《当代》等也经常发表电影剧本。电影剧本作为一种独立的文学样式,已拥有一支数量可观的专业和业余的作者队伍,其创作也出现了新的繁荣景象。据不完全统计,1981年公开发表的电影剧本有190部,1982年达到了220部,此后几年平均约为150部左右。不仅数量较以前有了明显增加,而且质量也有了较显著的提高。同时,文化部电影局也颁布了《关于故事片厂电影文学工作的若干规定》,明确提出了“电影文学工作是整个电影故事片创作生产的基础,对于繁荣电影艺术创作,提高故事片质量,发展电影事业起着重要的作用”[5]。为此,对于如何加强电影文学工作,提高电影文学创作水平,作出了一系列具体规定。《若干规定》的颁布对于推动电影文学创作的繁荣发展起了积极的作用。从该时期电影文学创作的题材、内容和风格来看,主要有以下几方面的特点: 其一,表现人民群众同“四人帮”的斗争及对十年动乱的历史进行反思的剧本创作,进入了一个新的层次。如叶楠的《巴山夜雨》、徐银华的《小街》、张弦的《被爱情遗忘的角落》等,在取材、主旨、角度和技巧上,都有显著的提高和创新。部分电影工作者还能自觉站在一定的历史高度,从宏观角度去反思我们民族的历史进程,大胆触及一些长期以来由于种种原因不能或不敢去表现的生活领域,从中探索和总结出必要的历史教训,给人以启迪和教益。如鲁彦周的《天云山传奇》,阿城、谢晋的《芙蓉镇》等,即是如此。 其二,不少电影剧作家以强烈的社会责任感和使命感,注重发挥电影艺术便于贴近时代和民众,并易于再现现实的特性,敏锐地捕捉和反映改革时代的新矛盾和新问题,从各个方面揭露阻碍四化建设的旧习惯和旧势力,及时创作了一批现实针对性较强、能切中时弊的剧作和一批反映新时期普通民众精神面貌的作品。如马林、朱枚等的《邻居》,张暖忻、李陀的《沙鸥》,谌容的《人到中年》,陆小雅的《红衣少女》,辛显令的《喜盈门》,颜学恕、竹子的《野山》,李唯的《黑炮事件》,郑义的《老井》等,既真实生动地反映了现实生活各个领域里的矛盾和斗争,表现了人们的理想和追求;又在艺术形式和技巧上作了不同程度的创新探索。 其三,革命历史题材剧作和传记片剧作也佳作纷呈,出现了一批有创新、有突破,并产生了较广泛的社会影响的好作品。前者如李洪辛、吴安萍等的《南昌起义》,郑重、成荫的《西安事变》,田军利、费林军的《血战台儿庄》,张天民、张笑天等的《开国大典》,侯育中、朱旭明的《百色起义》等。后者如沙叶新的《陈毅市长》,贺梦兄、张磊的《孙中山》等。 其四,文学名著改编则取得了显著成绩,许多现当代文学史上著名作家的代表作,被持续不断地搬上银幕,如陈白尘的《阿Q正传》,张瑶均、张磊的《伤逝》,桑弧的《子夜》,

韩寒文学作品语言风格分析

韩寒文学作品语言风格分析 韩寒是我国文学界“80后”的代表人物,其文学作品名数量虽然比较少,但是文学影响力却很大。在阅读韩寒文学作品时,对其语言风格进行分析,不仅可以更好的理解韩寒文学作品的内涵,同时还可以促进我们文学素养的提升,这对于我们综合发展有极大帮助。对此,下面就韩寒文学作品的语言风格进行全面探究。 标签:韩寒;文学作品;语言风格 前言 文学是语言艺术的高度凝练,就如建筑物无法离开最基本的建筑材料一样,文学作品如果脱离了语言,就不复存在。有很多学者认为,在探讨文学作品时,首先在于文学中语言的特殊性,语言风格是研究文学作品语言的重要内容,其可以充分揭示出语言规律,有助于读者更好的感知文学作品的魅力。 1.幽默的语言风格 幽默主要是通过语言中的各种组成要素,如修辞、语法、词汇等,达到引人发笑的效果。在文学领域中,幽默是一种妙趣横生、轻松诙谐的语言特色,其最显著的特色就是引人发笑、深含意蕴、带有讽刺。在韩寒的文学作品中,幽默的语言风格主要表现在: (1)词语的变异。词语变异是组成幽默表现风格的常用手段,其通过对常规进行变通,从而将违反逻辑规律的内容表现出来。在韩寒的文学作品中词语变异主要是通过词义变异的方式体现出来,其不提倡改变词语本身的形式,而是改变词语的使用环境,赋予词语新的含义,从而增添审美情趣。在韩寒的文学作品中,往往会赋予词语临时语境意义,使得词语本身的意义与临时意义形成比较大的反差,构建出一个幽默的氛围。 (2)理性意义的变异。这种变异主要是打破已约定俗成词义在人们心中的态势,产生一种轻松、幽默的氛围,使得表达更加具有直观性。例如在《长安乱》中:但是,就是逐城的县管,极度的聪慧,他将自己的银票和下人专门模仿的形似的监银的签名微微浸入水中,签字变化开,笔锋便无迹可寻,然后说是下雨时候淋到了。这种方法后来慢慢流传,民间称之为“洗钱”。这里的“洗钱”在现代汉语词典中的含义是将非法得来的钱财,通过存入银行,改变名义、性质的方式,将其变为合法收入。在这里作者字面意思入手,将其调侃为逐城的县管为了让银票产生流通效应而采取的一种荒诞做法。通过这样的理性意义变异,将逐城县管的愚昧行为和现代社会犯罪犯罪结合起来,产生了戏谑的幽默效应,让人感叹还可以这样理解“洗钱”。 2.繁丰的语言风格

2016年文学概论-名词解释

2016年文学概论-名词解释 【题型:名词解释】 [1] 客观说 答:在“文学四要素”中,客观说把作品抬到高于一切、重于一切的地步,认为作品一旦从作家的笔下诞生之后,就获得了完全客观的性质和独立的“身份”,它既与原作家不相干,也与读者无涉,它从外界的参照物中孤立出来,本身是一个“自足体”,出现了所谓的“客观化走向”。这种客观说最早与“为艺术而艺术”的思想相关。 【题型:名词解释】 [2] 文学文本 答:在文学理论与批评领域,文本是构成文学这种语言艺术品的具体语言系统,如运用语言写成的特定小说、诗、散文和报告文学等。这种文本我们称之为文学文本。 【题型:名词解释】 [3] 典型环境 答:典型环境是充分地体现了现实关系真实风貌的人物的生活环境,它包括以具体独特的个别性反映出特定历史时期社会现实关系总情势的大环境,又包括由这种历史环境形成的个人生活的具体环境。 【题型:名词解释】 [4] 意境 答:抒情作品中呈现出来的那种情景交融、虚实相生、活跃着生命律动的韵味无穷的诗意空间。如果典型是以单个形象而论的话,意境则是由若干形象构成的形象系统,是以整体形象出现的文学形象的高级形态。 【题型:名词解释】 [5] 文学象征意象 答:以表达观念、哲理为目的,以象征为艺术手段的具有荒诞性和审美求解性的艺术形象。它和典型、意境鼎足而立而居,也是达到艺术至境的高级形态之一。 【题型:名词解释】 [6] 叙述视角 答:叙述视角是叙述语言中对故事内容进行观察和讲述的特定角度。 【题型:名词解释】 [7] 叙述标记

答:文本中出现的对于理解故事来说是具有标志作用的叙述手段。叙事作品的作者为了引导读者理解自己所要表达的意义而在叙述的过程中设置的标识。叙述标记有时是用来提示写作意图或宗旨的。叙事文本中最明显的标记是它的标题。 【题型:名词解释】 [8] “圆形”人物 答:具有多种复杂性格特征的人物。当作品中的人物从人们已经了解的、期待着的行为状态中超脱出去,在其言行中表现出比直接显露的性格特征更复杂、更深层的性格特点时,这个人物就具有了性格的厚度,也就是说变成了“圆形”人物。 【题型:名词解释】 [9] 抒情策略 答:在创作作品时,作者总是在语法或修辞上采取某种方法和手段以达到抒情的目的并强化抒情的效果,这样的方法和手段谓之抒情策略。 【题型:名词解释】 [10] 文学风格 答:文学风格是指作家的创作个性在文学作品的有机整体中通过言语结构所显示出来的、能引起读者持久审美享受的艺术独创性。 【题型:名词解释】 [11] 创作个性 答:作家的气质禀赋、世界观、艺术观、审美趣味、艺术才能、审美追求等主观因素综合而的一种习惯性的行为方式。在日常个性的基础上升华。它支配着文学风格的形成和显现。 【题型:名词解释】 [12] 流派风格 答:一些思想感情、文学观念、审美趣味、创作主张、取材范围、表现方法和语言格调等相近的作家在创作上所形成的共同特色。是一种群体文化的表现。 【题型:名词解释】 [13] 期待视野 答:在文学阅读之先及阅读过程中,作为接受主体的读者,基于个人和社会的复杂原因,心理上往往会有一个既成的结构图式。读者的这种据以阅读本文的既成心理图式叫做阅读经验期待视野,简称期待视野。 【题型:名词解释】 [14] 预备情绪

相关文档
最新文档