Comparative and Explorative Evaluation
英语八年级上册英语形容词比较级与最高级复习课
目录
• Practice and consolidation • Summary and Review
01
Introduction
Course objectives and importance
Objectives
To review and revise the use of comparative and superior objectives in English
Some objectives have special variations in their
comparative and superior forms These variations are often related to the meaning or usage of the objective
Multiple choice exercises
• Exercise 1: Provide the comparative and superior forms of the following objectives
Multiple choice exercises
Happy Fast
Tall
Course objectives and importance
Importance
输标02入题
Comparative and superior objectives are essential for effective communication in English
01
Mastery of comparative and superlative objectives is crucial for enhancing language skills and preparing for high-level academic
初中英语形容词比较级和最高级课件
The comparative form is used when making a comparison between two items It is not used when comparing more than two items or when comparing a person, thing, or idea to a group or class
"When comparing a person, place, or thing to a group or category, use the superior objective with" of "or" in. "For example:" She is the smartest girl in the class. "
Use with "the" or "this": The superior objective can also be used with "the" or "this" to compare a person, place, or thing to a specific example For example: "This is the Tallest Building I have ever seen."
Integration with other subjects
Example: I am_____ (Happy) than my sister
01
Difficulty: High
02
Description: Translation questions require students to translate sentences from Chinese to English, or from English to Chinese, to test their language conversion ability.
对比类英语作文范文
Comparative essays are a common type of academic writing that require students to analyze and contrast two or more subjects,concepts,or phenomena.Here is a sample comparative essay that examines the differences and similarities between two popular forms of entertainment:movies and television shows.Title:The Cinematic Experience vs.The Small Screen:A Comparative Analysis of Movies and Television ShowsIntroductionThe world of entertainment has evolved significantly over the years,with movies and television shows emerging as two of the most popular forms of media consumption. While both mediums offer a platform for storytelling and visual engagement,they differ in various aspects such as production scale,narrative structure,and audience engagement. This essay aims to compare and contrast the characteristics of movies and television shows,exploring their unique features and the reasons behind their enduring appeal. Body Paragraph1:Production Scale and QualityMovies are often characterized by their grand production scale,which includes high budgets,elaborate sets,and the involvement of renowned actors and directors.The cinematic experience is designed to be immersive,with the use of advanced special effects and sound systems that are not commonly found in television productions.In contrast,television shows typically operate on smaller budgets and are produced more frequently,leading to a focus on storytelling and character development rather than highend production values.Body Paragraph2:Narrative StructureThe narrative structure of movies and television shows also differs significantly.Movies are selfcontained stories that need to be resolved within a few hours,which often results in a more compact and fastpaced narrative.Television shows,on the other hand,have the advantage of time,allowing for longer,more complex storylines that can span multiple episodes or even seasons.This extended narrative structure enables television shows to delve deeper into character arcs and plot developments,providing a more comprehensive exploration of themes and ideas.Body Paragraph3:Audience EngagementThe way audiences engage with movies and television shows is another area of comparison.Movies are often viewed as a communal experience,with viewers gathering in theaters to share the experience of a single narrative.This can create a sense of immediacy and shared emotion that is unique to the cinema.Television shows,however, are typically watched in the comfort of ones home,allowing for a more personal and flexible viewing experience.The ability to pause,rewind,and rewatch episodes at ones leisure can enhance audience engagement and create a deeper connection with the content.Body Paragraph4:Cultural Impact and AccessibilityBoth movies and television shows have the power to shape cultural conversations and influence societal norms.However,their accessibility varies.Movies,especially those released in theaters,require a certain level of commitment and financial investment from viewers.Television shows,in contrast,are more accessible due to the proliferation of streaming services and digital platforms,allowing for a wider audience reach and the potential for global cultural impact.ConclusionIn conclusion,while movies and television shows share the common goal of entertaining and engaging audiences,they do so in distinct ways.Movies offer a grand,immersive experience with a focus on high production values and compact storytelling.Television shows,conversely,provide a more intimate and accessible form of entertainment with the capacity for extended narratives and character development.Both mediums have their unique strengths and continue to captivate audiences worldwide,reflecting the diverse needs and preferences of the global entertainment consumer.。
比较药物治疗儿童和青少年焦虑症的有效性和可接受性：混合处理比较荟萃分析
比较药物治疗儿童和青少年焦虑症的有效性和可接受性：混合处理比较荟萃分析Olalekan A. Uthman and Jibril Abdulmalik目的：比较不同药物治疗儿童和青少年焦虑症的有效性和可接受性方法：更新了最近进行的关于药物治疗儿童和青少年焦虑症的Cochrane综述。
采用Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo 模拟进行混合处理比较荟萃分析，用于间接比较。
我们采用安慰剂作对照，计算了有95％可信区间（CrI ）的相对风险比（RR）。
结果：数据由16个临床试验总结而成，在试验中将儿童随机分成六个不同的给药组（包括安慰剂组）。
氟西汀组、氟伏沙明组、帕罗西汀组、舍曲林组和文拉法辛组比安慰剂组有效。
文拉法辛的有效性显著低于氟伏沙明（RR=0.60;95％CRI 0.35-0.95）和帕罗西汀（RR=0.65;95％CRI 0.44-0.93）。
氟西汀、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀和舍曲林的可接受性高于安慰剂。
文拉法辛耐受性低于氟伏沙明（RR= 0.16;95％CRI0.01-0.64）、帕罗西汀（RR=0.21;95％CRI 0.05-0.59）和舍曲林（RR=0.31;95％CRI 0.08-0.83）。
氟伏沙明的临床效果和可接受性的比例高于其他治疗组，分别为47.5％和50.6％，为最有效且耐受性良好的治疗组。
结论：治疗儿童焦虑症药物的有效性和可接受性在临床上存在重要差异，其中以氟伏沙明的有效性和可接受性最好。
开始治疗儿童和青少年焦虑症时，综合考虑药物的效果和可接受性，最好选择氟伏沙明。
关键词：焦虑症间接比较混合治疗比较儿科Comparative efficacy and acceptability ofpharmacotherapeutic agents for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents:a mixed treatment comparisonmeta-analysisOlalekan A. Uthman and Jibril Abdulmalik[Abstract] Objective: to compare efficacy and acceptability of different pharmacotherapeutic agents for treating anxiety disorders in children and adolescents Methods: A recently conducted Cochrane Review on pharmacotherapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents was updated.A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation was used to perform the indirect comparison. We calculated relative risk ratios (RR)with 95% credible interval (CrI) using placebo as the common comparator. Results: Data were combined from 16 clinical trials that randomized children to six different treatment strategies,including placebo. Fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine were more efficacious than placebo. Venlafaxine was significantly less efficacious than fluvoxamine (RR ? 0.60; 95% CrI 0.35–0.95) and paroxetine (RR ? 0.65; 95% CrI 0.44–0.93). Fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline had higher acceptability profile than placebo. Venlafaxine was less tolerated than fluvoxamine (RR ? 0.16;95% CrI 0.01–0.64), paroxetine (RR ? 0.21; 95% CrI 0.05–0.59), and sertraline (RR ? 0.31; 95% CrI0.08–0.83). Fluvoxamine had a higher rate of clinical response and acceptability compared to other treatments in the network, with probability of 47.5% and 50.6% of being the most efficacious and well-tolerated treatment, respectively. Conclusion:Clinically important differences exist betweencommonly prescribed pharmacotherapeutic agents for treating anxiety among children in terms of both efficacy and acceptability in favor of fluvoxamine. Fluvoxamine might be the best choice when starting treatment for anxiety disorders among children and adolescents because it has the most favorable balance between benefits and acceptability.Key words: Anxiety disorder – Indirect comparison – Mixed treatment comparison– Pediatrics背景焦虑症常见于儿童，并对学校、家庭关系以及社会功能造成极大损害[1,2]。
英语上册形容词与副词的比较等级用法课件
3
+Advancements of Frequency
They answer questions about how many things happen
The Function of Adjectives and Advisers
Example
He really goes out on weekends (Rare is an advertisement of frequency)
The Function of Adjectives and Advisers
+Limiting
They limit the noun or pronoun their modification
Example
My French friend (French limits the friend to someone from France)
• Complex Sentence Construction: Students should be able to construct complex sentiments using superior objectives to compare three or more nouns
• Distinguishing between Adjectives and Advisers: They should be able to differentiate between objections and advisors and use them appropriately in sentiments
Adjectives and Advancements
目录
• The presence pattern transformation of comparative levels between objectives and advertisements
八年级英语上册-形容词副词比较级和最高级用法总结课件
The comparative and superlative forms of adverbs
Superlative Form
To form the superlative form of adjectives, we usually add "most" in front of the adjective. However, there are also exceptions to this rule. Some adjectives may undergo changes in their spelling or have irregular superlative forms.
Superlative adverbs
used to compare more than two actions or situations, e.g., "he runs the fastest among them".
Special usage of comparative and superlative
Monosyllabic adjectives with vowel sounds add '-er' or '-est' for comparative and superlative forms. Example: 'big' -> 'bigger' -> 'biggest'.
英语作文比较报告
Comparative Analysis of English Essays: A Multifaceted ApproachIn the realm of academic writing, English essays stand as a significant metric of a student's analytical, critical, and creative thinking abilities. They not only serve as a means of communicating ideas but also reflect the author's grasp of the subject matter and command over the language. In this comparative analysis, we delve into the distinct features and elements that differentiate one English essay from another, focusing on content, structure, language use, and creativity.**Content Depth and Breadth**The foundation of any essay lies in its content. A profound essay is one that explores a topic comprehensively, delving into various aspects and perspectives. In contrast, a superficial essay may touch upon the topic lightly, lacking depth and insights. A comparative analysis of two essays reveals that essay A digs deeper into the subject matter, discussing related concepts andtheories, while essay B remains on the surface, offering a basic overview.**Structural Coherence**The structure of an essay is crucial in maintaining a logical flow of ideas. A well-structured essay guides the reader through the argument, ensuring a smooth transition from one point to another. Essay A exhibits a clear structure, with well-defined introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. In contrast, essay B lacks coherence, with ideas seemingly scattered and disconnected.**Language Use and Clarity**The language used in an essay plays a pivotal role in its clarity and impact. Essay A employs precise vocabulary, avoiding jargon and technical terms that may confuse the reader. Its sentences are concise and to the point, ensuring effective communication. On the other hand, essay B suffers from verbosity and unclear language, making it difficult for the reader to grasp the author'sintended meaning.**Creativity and Originality**Creativity is what sets an essay apart from the rest. It involves presenting ideas in a unique and innovative manner, offering fresh perspectives and insights. Essay A stands out for its creativity, introducing original arguments and examples that engage the reader. Conversely, essay B lacks creativity, following a conventional approach and failing to offer anything new or insightful.In conclusion, a comparative analysis of English essays highlights the significance of content depth, structural coherence, language clarity, and creativity in distinguishing between high-quality essays and those that fall short. It is essential for writers to pay attention to these aspects when crafting their essays, ensuring that their work stands out for its quality and impact.**英语作文比较报告：多维度分析**在学术写作领域，英语作文是衡量学生分析、批判和创造性思维能力的重要指标。
比较教育学的英文
比较教育学的英文Comparative Education: A Comprehensive ExplorationComparative education is a field of study that examines and analyzes educational systems, policies, and practices across different countries, cultures, and contexts. It is a multidisciplinary approach that draws on various academic disciplines, including sociology, anthropology, history, and political science, to gain a deeper understanding of the complex and diverse nature of education around the world.One of the primary goals of comparative education is to identify and understand the factors that shape and influence educational systems, such as cultural traditions, political ideologies, economic conditions, and social structures. By comparing and contrasting different educational approaches, researchers and policymakers can gain valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of various educational models, and use this knowledge to inform educational reforms and improvements.Another important aspect of comparative education is the exploration of educational equity and access. Researchersin this field often examine the ways in which educational opportunities are distributed across different socioeconomic, ethnic, and cultural groups, and how these disparities can be addressed through policy interventions and educational initiatives.Moreover, comparative education plays a crucial role in the globalization of education. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, there is a growing need to understand the ways in which educational systems and practices are influenced by and respond to global trendsand challenges, such as the integration of technology inthe classroom, the internationalization of higher education, and the promotion of cross-cultural exchange and understanding.In terms of research methods, comparative education employs a wide range of qualitative and quantitative techniques, including case studies, surveys, interviews,and document analysis. Researchers in this field often engage in fieldwork, visiting and observing educationalinstitutions in different countries, and conducting in-depth analyses of educational policies, curricula, and teaching practices.Overall, the field of comparative education provides a valuable framework for understanding the complex and multifaceted nature of education, and for identifying opportunities for educational improvement and innovation on a global scale.比较教育学:全面探索比较教育学是一个研究领域,它审视和分析不同国家、文化和背景下的教育体系、政策和实践。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
© Brigitte Jörg
iConnectEU Workshop – October 16th, 2008 Brussels
Technology Partners
Project Results
DFKI Co-ordinator
“LT World” Portal Information Extraction Semantic Web
© Brigitte Jörg
iConnectEU Workshop – October 16th, 2008 Brussels
Project Consortium
Project Results
Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz, Germany Institute Jozef Stefan, Slovenia Ontotext Lab, Sirma AI EAD, Bulgaria RTD Talos, Cyprus Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Czech Republic Archimedes Foundation, Estonia Comp. and Autom. Research Inst., Hung. Academy of Sc., Hungary Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia Lithuanian Innovation Centre, Lithuania Projects in Motion, Malta Technical University of Silesia, Poland National Institute for R&D in Informatics, Romania Slovak University of Technology, Poland TUBITAK, Turkey The Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK (formerly CCLRC, UK)
“CERIF” Standard Access to Data
© Brigitte Jörg
Jozef Stefan Institute Technical Co-ordinator
“Project Intelligence” Data Mining Social Network Analysis
Ontotext
“KIM Semantic Annotation Platform”
euroCRIS
© Brigitte Jörg
iConnectEU Workshop – October 16th, 2008 Brussels
Introduction of Speaker
Project Results
Brigitte Jörg
M.A. Information Science Information Systems, Business Administration
Project Results
Knowledge Base for RTD Competencies in IST
– Results from a European SSA Project –
Brigitte Jörg
German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence Language Technology Lab, Saarbrücken, Gend Results
Conclusion / Beyond the Project
© Brigitte Jörg
iConnectEU Workshop – October 16th, 2008 Brussels
Project Information
Project Results
Project Manager, Researcher
DFKI GmbH, Language Technology Lab, Saarbrücken, Germany
CERIF TG Leader, Board Member
euroCRIS
Contact:
brigitte.joerg @ dfki.de http://www.dfki.de/~brigitte/
Funding Organization: European Commission Funding Program: Sixth Framework Programme (FP6: IST (3rd Call)) Project Type: Specific Support Action (SSA) Duration: 32 Months (April 2005 – November 2007) Project Co-ordination: DFKI GmbH Technical Co-ordination: Jozef Stefan Institute (IJS) Technology Partners: DFKI, IJS, Ontotext, STFC Project Consortium: 15 partners from EU MS, NMS and ACC
© Brigitte Jörg
iConnectEU Workshop – October 16th, 2008 Brussels
Presentation Outline
Project Results
Introduction of the Project
Information Repository Data Collection / Data Integration / Data Cleaning Analytic Tools