认知语言学参考书目
认知语言学

作者简介:李福印,男,1963年11 月生,北京航空航天大学教授,博 士生导师,香港中文大学博士学位, 北京外国语大学兼职教授。主要研 究领域:语义学;认知语言学;隐 喻理论与实践;应用认知语言学等。 主要讲授语义学、认知语言学、隐 喻理论与实践、心智哲学等课程。 代表作有《认知语言学概论》,《语 义学概论》,《语义学教程》等。
4.1 理据性的概念及其表现
概念:“非任意性”,“可解释性” 表现:在词形层面,复合词表现了突出的理据性 。如“看 到”是动作和结果的结合。 在语义层面,概念转喻是理据性的表现。如“一把手”。 语言形式“手”与意义“人”之间建立了转喻关系。 在语法层面,句子结构也是有理据的,各种形式的象似性 就是其表现。
(1)语言不是人类大脑中独立的认知机制 • (2)语法是概念化 • (3)语言知识来自语言的使用
• 1.5 认知语言学的四位创始人
第二章 认知语言学的分支领域
• Driven将认知语言学划分为五大领域 Talmy 的认知语义学 • 认知语法 基于格式塔心理学的研究
构式语法 原型理论 词汇网络理论
他很懂事 他很懂事,也很聪明
② 距离象似性:功能上,概念上和认知上距离近的,形式上的距 离也近。 John killed Bill. 我妹妹, 我老乡 John caused Bill to die 我手, 我汽车 ③ 顺序象似性:在其他条件相同的情况下。叙述的顺序对应所描 述的事件的顺序。 I came, I saw, I conquered.
• 3.3认知语言学研究的热点目的语言
• (1)针对英语的研究占绝大多数,其他语言没有得到足 够的关注。 • (2)国内论文数量在缓慢上升,以汉语语言为研究对象 的论文数量有显著增加,但与国际水平仍存在很大差距, 主要表现为绝大多数缺乏原创型,理论建树小。
认知语言学的参考书目

主要参考文献石毓智,李讷:汉语发展史上结构助词的兴替《中国社会科学》1998.6----论“的”的语法化历程文旭:《语法化》简介,《当代语言学》1998.3何刚:语用方式——语用的语法化,《外国语》(上海外国语大学学报)1997.3刘坚,曹广顺,吴福祥:论诱发汉语词汇语法化的若干因素,《中国语文》1995.3沈家煊:“语法化”研究综观,《外语教学与研究》1994.4郝书阁:语法化的泛时性研究,《外语学刊》2000.3石毓智:《时间的一维性对介词衍生的影响》,《中国语文》1995.1《汉语语法化的历程---形态句法发展的动因和机制》,北京大学出版社。
石毓智:《语法的形式和理据》,江西教育出版社,2001年。
《语法的认知语义基础》,江西教育出版社,2000年。
沈家煊:《不对称和标记论》,江西教育出版社,1999年。
张敏:《认知语言学与汉语名词短语》,中国社会科学出版社,1998年。
袁毓林:《语言的认知研究和计算分析》,北京大学出版社,1998年。
戴浩一:《以认知为基础的汉语功能语法刍议》,《国外语言学》1990年。
赵艳芳:《认知语言学概论》,上海外语教育出版社,2000年。
张伯江:《现代汉语的双及物结构式》,《中国语文》,1999.3何自然冉永平主编:《语用与认知---关联理论研究》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年。
王寅《认知语言学》,上海外语教育出版社,2007年张云秋《现代汉语受事宾语句研究》,学林出版社,2004年Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner.1998 Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science Vol.22(2).Goldberg, Adele E. 1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. The University of Chicago Press.Lakoff,George. 1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1999 Philosophy in the Flesh----The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought (与Johnson合著).New York: Basic Books.Langacker, R, W.1987/1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.1,2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Taylor, John R. 1989 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory.Oxford: Claredon Press.Haiman,J.1985/1987 Natural Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.1985 Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.(1983年6月“句法象似性”专题大会的论文集)Simone, Raffaele.1994. Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.(1992年6月“句法象似性”专题大会的论文集)F.Ungerer & H.J.Schmid: An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics(认知语言学入门), 外语教学与研究出版社,2001年。
认知语言学的参考书目

主要参考文献石毓智,李讷:汉语发展史上结构助词的兴替《中国社会科学》1998.6----论“的”的语法化历程文旭:《语法化》简介,《当代语言学》1998.3何刚:语用方式——语用的语法化,《外国语》(上海外国语大学学报)1997.3刘坚,曹广顺,吴福祥:论诱发汉语词汇语法化的若干因素,《中国语文》1995.3沈家煊:“语法化”研究综观,《外语教学与研究》1994.4郝书阁:语法化的泛时性研究,《外语学刊》2000.3石毓智:《时间的一维性对介词衍生的影响》,《中国语文》1995.1《汉语语法化的历程---形态句法发展的动因和机制》,北京大学出版社。
石毓智:《语法的形式和理据》,江西教育出版社,2001年。
《语法的认知语义基础》,江西教育出版社,2000年。
沈家煊:《不对称和标记论》,江西教育出版社,1999年。
张敏:《认知语言学与汉语名词短语》,中国社会科学出版社,1998年。
袁毓林:《语言的认知研究和计算分析》,北京大学出版社,1998年。
戴浩一:《以认知为基础的汉语功能语法刍议》,《国外语言学》1990年。
赵艳芳:《认知语言学概论》,上海外语教育出版社,2000年。
张伯江:《现代汉语的双及物结构式》,《中国语文》,1999.3何自然冉永平主编:《语用与认知---关联理论研究》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年。
王寅《认知语言学》,上海外语教育出版社,2007年张云秋《现代汉语受事宾语句研究》,学林出版社,2004年Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner.1998 Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science Vol.22(2).Goldberg, Adele E. 1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. The University of Chicago Press.Lakoff,George. 1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1999 Philosophy in the Flesh----The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought (与Johnson合著).New York: Basic Books.Langacker, R, W.1987/1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.1,2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Taylor, John R. 1989 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory.Oxford: Claredon Press.Haiman,J.1985/1987 Natural Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.1985 Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.(1983年6月“句法象似性”专题大会的论文集)Simone, Raffaele.1994. Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.(1992年6月“句法象似性”专题大会的论文集)F.Ungerer & H.J.Schmid: An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics(认知语言学入门), 外语教学与研究出版社,2001年。
自然语言处理与认知语言理解相关的书籍-概述说明以及解释

自然语言处理与认知语言理解相关的书籍-概述说明以及解释1.引言1.1 概述概述部分的内容可以包括自然语言处理(Natural Language Processing,简称NLP)和认知语言理解(Cognitive Language Understanding)的基本介绍和背景。
自然语言处理是一门研究如何使计算机能够理解和处理人类语言的领域。
它结合了计算机科学、人工智能和语言学等多个学科的知识和方法,旨在将自然语言转换为计算机能够理解和处理的形式,实现计算机与人类之间的自然语言交互。
认知语言理解则侧重于研究人类对语言的理解和思维过程。
它探索语言如何与人的认知、思维和心理过程紧密相关,如何通过语言表达和传达信息,以及如何从语言中获取和推断有关世界的知识。
自然语言处理和认知语言理解在很多领域中都具有重要的应用价值。
它们可以被应用于机器翻译、信息检索、语音识别、文本分类、情感分析等任务中,使得计算机能够更好地理解和解释人类语言的含义和上下文。
本文旨在介绍与自然语言处理和认知语言理解相关的书籍,以帮助读者深入了解这两个领域的研究和应用。
接下来的章节将分别介绍自然语言处理相关的书籍和认知语言理解相关的书籍,并对它们的内容和贡献进行详细阐述。
通过阅读这些书籍,读者可以更好地理解和应用自然语言处理和认知语言理解的技术和方法。
1.2文章结构2. 正文2.1 自然语言处理相关书籍:在自然语言处理领域,有许多经典的著作可以供我们学习和参考。
以下是几本值得推荐的书籍:2.1.1 书籍1:《自然语言处理综论》这本书是自然语言处理领域的经典教材,由斯坦福大学的Daniel Jurafsky 和James H. Martin 合著。
它全面介绍了自然语言处理的基础知识和常见技术,包括词法分析、句法分析、语义分析等。
该书深入浅出,适合初学者和有一定基础的读者阅读。
2.1.2 书籍2:《Speech and Language Processing》这是一本由Dan Jurafsky 和James H. Martin 合著的畅销教材,被公认为是自然语言处理领域的必读之作。
语言学及应用语言学必读书目

语言学及应用语言学必读书目
1.《语言学简明教程》:这本教程为入门级读者提供了关于语言学的基本概念和理论,包括语音、语义、语法等方面。
2. 《语言学导论》:这本教材深入探讨了语言本质、语言系统、语言变化等基本概念,适合对语言学有一定了解的学者阅读。
3. 《现代应用语言学》:这本著作介绍了应用语言学在现代社会中的应用,包括语言教育、语音识别、翻译等方面。
4. 《语言与认识》:这本书系统地讨论了语言与认知之间的关系,探讨了语言如何影响人类思维和智力的发展。
5. 《语言的起源》:这本书探讨了语言的起源和发展,涉及到人类进化、社会演变和语言交流等方面。
6. 《语言行为》:这本书涵盖了语言行为的各个方面,包括语音、语言习得、语言交际、语言变化等。
7. 《语言、文化与认知》:这本书从文化差异的角度研究了语言与认知之间的关系,探讨了不同文化背景下的语言使用和思维方式。
8. 《语言教育与应用语言学》:这本书介绍了语言教育和应用语言学的基本理论和应用,包括语言教学策略、教师培训、语言学习软件等方面。
9. 《语言流行学》:这本书研究了语言流行现象的起源和发展,涉及到社会、文化等多个方面,适合对现代流行文化和语言流行现象感兴趣的读者。
10. 《语言和身份》:这本书从身份认同的角度探讨了语言的作
用和影响,适合对语言和文化研究有兴趣的读者阅读。
认知语言学参考书目

认知语言学参考资料Aitchison, J. 1987. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition.Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.Anderson, J. R. 1995. Cognitive Psychology and its Implications.New York: W. H. Feeman and Company.Bach, K. 1987. Thought and Reference. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Barsalou, L. W. 1982. Context-independent information and context-dependent information in concepts.Memory & Cognition 10: 82-93.Barsalou, L. W. 1983. Ad hoc categories.Memory & Cognition 11: 211-227.Barsalou, L. W. 1987. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 101-140. Barsalou, L. W. & B. H.Ross. 1986. The roles of automatic and strategic processing in sensitivity to superordinate and property frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12: 116-134.Barsalou, L. W. & J. W.Hutchinson. 1987. Schema-based planning of events in consumer contexts. In P. F. Anderson & M. Wallendorf (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, V ol. 14. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 114-118.Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance.Oxford: Blackwell.Blakemore, D. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Carston, R. 1988. Language and cognition. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, V ol. 3. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 38-68.Croft, W. & A. D.Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language.New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.Fauconnier, G. 1997.Mappings in Thought and Language.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress.Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22: 133-187.Fischer, K. 2000. From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles.New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Fodor, J. A. 1975. The Language of Thought.New York: T. Y. Crowell.Fodor, J. A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Fodor, J. A. 1998.Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Fodor, J. A. & Z. W.Pylyshyn. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28: 3-71.Foster-Cohen, S. H. 2000. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Language Research 16(1): 77-92.Frege, G. 1977. On Concept and Object.In P.Geach& M.Black (eds.),Translations from the Philosophical Writings of GottlobFrege. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Gibbs, R. W. 1987. The relevance of relevance for psychological theory.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: 718-719.Goatly, A. 1994. Register and redemption of relevance theory: The case of metaphor.Pragmatics 4: 139-181.Green, D. W. et al. 1996. Cognitive Science: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Gutt, E.-A. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context.Oxford: Blackwell. Jary, M. 1998. Relevance and the communication of politeness.Journal of Pragmatics30: 1-19.Jaszczolt, K. M.1996a. Relevance and infinity: Implications for discourse interpretation.Journal of Pragmatics 25: 703-722.Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Jordan, M. P. 1998. The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 705-752.Jucker, A. H. 1997. Review on Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 107-119.Lakoff, G. & M.Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By.Chicago: The University of ChicagoPress.Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, V ol. 1-2. Stanford: StanfordUniversity Press.Marmaridou, S. S. A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Marten, L. 2002.At the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface: Verbal Underspecification and Concept Formation in Dynamic Syntax.Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Rouchota, V. & A. H.Jucker (eds.) 1998. Current Issues in Relevance Theory.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Schank, R. & R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Sperber, D. 1994b.The modularity of thought and the epistemology of representation.In L. A.Hirschfeld& S. A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 39-67.Sperber. D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs.Mind and Language 12: 67-83.Sperber, D. 2000. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 117-137.Sperber, D. & D.Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1990.Rhetoric and relevance. In D. Wellbery& J. Bender (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Stanford: StanfordUniversity Press, 140-155.Sperber, D. & D.Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Sperber, D. & D.Wilson. 1996. Fodor’s frame problem and relevance theory: A reply to Chiappe&Kukla. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 19: 530-532.Sperber, D.& D.Wilson. 1997. Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences.Multilingua16: 145-151.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1998a. The mapping between the mental and public lexicon. In P.Carruthers & J. Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 184-200.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1998b. Irony and relevance: A reply to DrsSeto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston&S. Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283-293.Sperber, D. & D.Wilson. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind & Language 17: 3-23.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 2005. Pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17: 353-388. Ungerer, F. & H. J.Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics.London: Longman.Wilson, D. 1999. Relevance and relevance theory. In R. Wilson & F. Keil (eds.), MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 719-722. Wilson, D. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication.In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations.New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 411-448.Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance Theory and lexical pragmatics.Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 15(2): 273-291.Wilson,D. 2004a.Relevance and lexical pragmatics.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 343-60.Wilson, D. 2004b. Relevance, word meaning and communication: The past, present, and future of lexical pragmatics. Modern Foreign Languages (现代外语) 1: 1-13. Wilson, D. 2005a.New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity.Lingua115: 1129-1146.Wilson,D. 2005b.Pragmatics.In F. Jackson& M. Smith (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy.Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 468-501.Wilson,D.&R. Carston. 2008. Metaphor and the ‘emergent property’ problem: A relevance-theoretic treatment. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (2007), 1-40.Wilson, D. & T.Matsui. 1998. Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence and relevance.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 173-200.Wilson, D. & D.Sperber. 1981. On Grice’s Theory of conversation. In P. Werth (ed.), Conversation and Discourse.London: Croom Helm, 155–178.Wilson, D. & D.Sperber. 1988. Representation and relevance. In R. M. Kempson (ed.),Wilson, D. & D.Sperber. 1991b. Pragmatics and modularity. In S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 583–595.Wilson, D. & D. Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1-25.Wilson, D. & D.Sperber. 2002b. Truthfulness and relevance.Mind 111: 583-632.胡壮麟. 2004. 认知隐喻学. 北京: 北京大学出版社.束定芳(主编). 2004. 语言的认知研究-认知语言学论文精选. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.熊学亮. 1999. 认知语用学概论. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.赵彦春. 2003. 认知词典学探索. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.赵艳芳. 2001. 认知语言学概论. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.。
有关语言学的书
有关语言学的书
1.《语言学导论》:作者为美国语言学家兼人类学家埃德华·萨普尔斯,该书介绍了语言学的基本概念、理论、方法和研究领域,是语言学入门的经典教材。
2.《语法基础》:作者为美国语言学家诺姆·钱姆斯基,该书主要讲述了语法学的基本概念和理论,重点探讨了语言结构的层级关系和规则。
3.《语言与认知》:作者为美国心理学家史蒂文·平克,该书从认知角度出发,阐述了语言与思维的关系,引领了语言认知科学的新方向。
4.《语言学概论》:作者为英国语言学家安德鲁·雷德福,该书把重点放在了语言学的历史发展和主要研究方法上,具有较高的学术价值和启发意义。
除此之外,还有许多有关语言学的著作,如《语义学》、《语用学》、《文化语言学》、《跨文化交际》等,这些书对于理解人类语言的本质和多样性,具有不可替代的作用。
- 1 -。
语言学必读经典书
语言学必读经典书语言学作为一门研究语言的学科,拥有丰富的理论体系和研究方法。
想要深入了解语言学的经典著作,可以从以下十本书入手。
1.《语言的起源》作者:Charles Darwin简介:达尔文在本书中探讨了语言的起源和演化,提出了关于语言起源的进化论观点。
这本书对于理解语言的本质和语言演化过程有重要意义。
2.《语言学原理》作者:Ferdinand de Saussure简介:这本书是现代语言学的奠基之作,提出了语言学的基本原理和概念,如语言符号、语音和语义等。
它对后来的语言学研究产生了深远的影响。
3.《语言学导论》作者:George Yule简介:这是一本介绍语言学基本概念和理论的入门书籍。
它从语音、语法、语义等多个层面全面介绍了语言学的基本内容,适合初学者阅读。
4.《语言与认知》作者:Noam Chomsky简介:这本书探讨了语言和思维的关系,提出了著名的生成语法理论。
它对于理解语言的结构和人类思维方式具有重要启示。
5.《语言学与哲学》作者:Gottlob Frege简介:这本书探讨了语言和逻辑的关系,提出了关于语言的真理和意义的哲学观点。
它对于理解语言的逻辑结构和意义有深入的研究。
6.《语言与文化》作者:Edward Sapir简介:这本书探讨了语言和文化的相互关系,提出了著名的“语言相对论”观点。
它对于理解语言的文化背景和多样性具有重要意义。
7.《语言习得与教学》作者:Stephen Krashen简介:这本书介绍了语言习得的理论和教学方法,提出了“输入假设”和“沉浸式教学”等观点。
它对于语言教学和学习具有实用价值。
8.《语言变化与语言联系》作者:William Labov简介:这本书介绍了语言变化和语言联系的研究方法和理论,提出了著名的“变体语言学”观点。
它对于理解语言变化和语言差异具有重要意义。
9.《语用学导论》作者:John Searle简介:这本书介绍了语用学的基本概念和理论,探讨了语言使用的意义和目的。
最新认知语言学必读文献清单
最新认知语言学必读文献清单认知语言学概述2007-08-01 15:00:12 阅读920 评论2 字号:大中小订阅General Readings in Cognitive LinguisticsPrepared by Vyv EvansIf you would like to find out more about various topics incognitive linguistics, thefollowing listing provides suggestions for follow-upreading. I have restricted myselection to published books (including bothmonographs, edited volumes andvolumes in press). The reading list is annotated anddivided into three sections:General Introductions to Cognitive LinguisticsWorks of General Reference, andSpecific Topics and TheoriesNote however, the following overview article, availableon-line from my website:Evans, Vyvyan; Benjamin Bergen and Jörg Zinken (Inpress.) CognitiveLinguistics: An Overview. In V. Evans, B. Bergen and J.Zinken (eds.).The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox.General Introductions to Cognitive Linguistics Croft, W., & Cruse, A. D. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.A recent introduction to cognitive linguistics. Particularlygood coverage of lexicalsemantics and constructional approaches to grammar, although less detail on otheraspects of cognitive linguistics.Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mahwah, NJand Edinburgh: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates/Edinburgh University Press.The most comprehensive general introduction to the field. Each chapter provides adetailed annotated reading list and exercises. Also includes chapters which comparecognitive linguistic theories with other theoreticalframeworks.Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.The most accessible of the general introductions, focusing on general ideas rather thandetail. The selection of topics covered, is, nevertheless,a little uneven.Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H.-J. (1996). Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London:Longman.Very clear explanations of the areas presented, particularly on prototype and basiclevel objects research. However, the coverage is ratherone-sided focusing oncognitive semantics at the expense of cognitive approaches to grammar. The book isalso now over 10 years old.Works of General ReferenceEvans, V. (Forthcoming). Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: EdinburghUniversity Press.A glossary of over 350 specialist terms used incognitive linguistics.Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H. (2006). Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics.Oxford: Oxford University Press.A major reference work containing originalencyclopedia-like articles by leading experts. Provides comprehensive coverage of all the key areas of cognitive linguistics.Janssen, T., & Redeker, G. (1999). Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope andMethodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.An edited volume containing original articles by aselection of leading cognitivelinguists. The articles address the theoretical andempirical basis of cognitivelinguistics, and cognitive linguistic theories.Specific Topics and TheoriesBLENDING THEORYCoulson, S. (2000). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending inMeaning Construction. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.An important study on the role of conceptual blending in language comprehension.Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending andthe Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: BasicBooks.The definitive introduction to conceptual blending by the two architects of the theory.Highly accessible.CATEGORISATIONLakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories RevealAbout the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. One of the classic texts in cognitive linguistics. Lakoff makes the case for a noveltheory of cognitive models in order to account for recentfindings in humancategorisation. Also provides a philosophical framework for research in cognitivelinguistics which remains influential. Taylor, J. (2003). Linguistic Categorization, 3rd edition.Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.Provides a highly accessible account of cognitive linguistic approaches to typicalityeffects and fuzzy categories as manifested in language.COGNITIVE GRAMMARLangacker, R. (1987/1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volumes I and II.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Volume I of Langacker’s two-volume edifice lays out the theoretical assumptions ofhis theory. Volume II applies the theoretical architecture to a range of grammaticalphenomena. These volumes are among the most important in cognitive linguistics.Taylor, J. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.An excellent textbook introduction to Langacker’stheory.COGNITIVE PSYCHOLINGUISTICSD_browska, E. (2004). Language, Mind and Brain:Some Psychological andNeurological Constraints on Grammar. Edinburgh:Edinburgh UniversityPress.An excellent and highly accessible overview and review of the cognitive linguisticposition with respect to key issues in psychologuistics, including language acqusition, lateralisation and modularity. Also includes a review of cognitive linguistic criticsimsof Chomsky’s Universal Grammar hypothesis.COGNITIVE LEXICAL SEMANTICS Cuyckens, H., & Zawada, B. (2001). Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam,NJ: John Benjamins.An edited collection of original articles presenting contemporary work and views onmodelling lexical polysemy in cognitive linguistics.Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J. (2003). CognitiveApproaches to LexicalSemantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.An excellent representative selection of original articles relating to contemporaryapproaches to cognitive lexical semantics.Nerlich, B., Todd, Z., Herman, V., & Clarke, D. D.(2003). Polysemy: FlexiblePatterns in the Mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Another recent collected volume of papers on linguisticpolysemy. However, thestrength of this volume, in addition to includingexcellent review articles by theeditors and John Taylor, also includes contributionsfrom a range of scholars,including those who work in frameworks outsidecognitive linguistics.Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes,Embodied Experience and Cognition. Cambridge:Cambridge UniversityPress.The most detailed cognitive linguistic study of English spatial relations. The bookmakes the case for the experiential basis ofprepositional meanings and their extensions. It also provides an account of polysemy asconceptual in nature.CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR AND METONYMY Barcelona, A. (2003). Metaphor and Metonymy at theCrossroads: A CognitivePerspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.A collection of original articles addressing therelationship between metaphor and metonymy. Several of the articles reflect the growingconviction in cognitivelinguistics that metonymy may be as, or even more, foundational than metaphor.Dirven, R, Pörings, R. (2002). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.A collection reproducing seminal and influential articlesrelating to conceptualmetaphor and metonymy.Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Presents psycholinguistic evidence for the conceptual basis of figurative languagephenomena such as metaphor.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We LiveBy, 2nd, revised edition.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.This book, now a classic, and originally published in 1980, launched much of therecent interest in metaphor.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind andits Challenge to Western Thought. New York: BasicBooks.An updating of Lakoff and Johnson’s seminal ideas on conceptual metaphors and thenotion of embodied cognition.Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction.Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.An accessible textbook introduction to ConceptualMetaphor Theory.Gibbs, R., & Steen, G. (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam, NJ:John Benjamins.An edited collection of original papers broadly reflectingthe nature and scope ofrecent research within the framework of ConceptualMetaphor Theory. CONSTRUCTIONAL APPROACHES TO GRAMMARCroft, W. (2002). Radical Construction Grammar.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Pr esents Croft’s theory of Radical ConstructionGrammar.Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to VerbalArgument Structure. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.A classic. Makes a compelling case for a constructionalapproach to grammaremploying verbal argument constructions as a testcase.Östman, J.-O., & Fried, M. (2005). Construction Grammars: Cognitive Groundingand Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam, NJ: JohnBenjamins.An edited collection of original papers addressing theoretical and methodologicalissues relating to constructional approaches togrammar.CULTURAL LINGUISTICSPalmer, G. (1996). Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. University of TexasPress.In this book Palmer makes a compelling case for applying cognitive linguistics tocultural aspects of language, arguing for a theory ofcultural linguistics.EMBODIMENT AND CONCEPTUALIZATION Nuyts, J., & Pederson, E. (1997) (Eds). Language and Conceptualization. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.An important collection of articles on the relationshipbetween language andconceptual processes.Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.One of the first book-length treatments in cognitive science which made the case forthe centrality of embodiment for cognition. Remainsextremely important and ishighly accessible.EMPIRICAL APPROACHESGonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S., &Spivey, M. J. (Eds) (2005),Empirical Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam,NJ: John Benjamins.A recent edited volume comprising original articles byprominent cognitive linguistsand psychologists. The collection both makes the casefor empirical methods incognitive linguistics and represents the state-of-the-art.IMAGE SCHEMA sHampe, B. (2005). From Perception to Meaning: ImageSchemas in CognitiveLinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.An outstanding recent contribution to image schema theory. An edited collection ofpapers by leading scholars presenting a range of often conflicting positions on thenature of image schemas.Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imaginationand Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press. One of the classic texts in cognitive linguistics. Provides the first detailed treatment ofimage schemas.Mandler, J. (2004). The Foundations of Mind: Origins ofConceptual Thought.Oxford: Oxford University Press.An important study by a leading developmental psychologist. Mandler describes howimage schemas derive from perceptual experience inpre-linguistic infants.LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND LANGUAGE USEBarlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (2000) (Eds.). Usage-BasedModels of Language.Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.An important collection of original aricles which provide various perspectives on howbest to model knowledge of language in terms ofusage-based factors.Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: AUsage-Based Theory ofLanguage Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.An important recent synthesis of empirical findingsrelating to first languageacquisition. Presents the case for a usage-based perspective on language acquisition.LANGUAGE AND CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE Evans, V. (2004). The Structure of Time: Language,Meaning and TemporalCognition. Amsterdam, NJ: John Benjamins.Investigates the relationship between lexical and conceptual structure in the domain oftime.Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I and II. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.Brings together, and updates, Talmy’s classic papers inwhich he explores howlanguage encodes various aspects of conceptualstructure including space, forcedynamicsand motion.LANGUAGE CHANGECroft, W. (2000). Explaining Language Change: AnEvolutionary Perspective.London: Longman.A seminal work by one of the most original thinkerscurrently working in cognitivelinguistics. Croft presents a usage-based theory of language change which appliesinsights from the generalised theory of natural selectionto language.Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics:Metaphorical and CulturalAspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Another highly influential and now classic text in cognitive linguistics. Sweetser usesideas from metaphor theory and image schema theory in order to account for semanticaspects of grammatical change.LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY AND RELATIVITY Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in Mind: Advances in the Studyof Language and Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.A recent collection of original papers by some of themost prominent cognitivescientists who work on cross-linguistic diversity and therelationship betweenlanguage, mind and thought. Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. (1996) (Eds.). RethinkingLinguistic Relativity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.An important collection of articles from the mid 1990s which did much to revitalisethe linguistic relativity debate. Of particular importance are articles by Bowerman,Lucy, Levinson, and Slobin.Levinson, S. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.An extremely important book. Presents a synthesis of over a decade’s research oncross-cultural studies on the representation of space.Levinson uses his research as aplatform to argue for the pervasive effects ofcross-linguistic variation on nonlinguisticcognition.MENTAL SPACES THEORY Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental Spaces inGrammar: ConditionalConstructions. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.Presents a theoretical account of conditionalconstructions using the framework ofmental spaces theory.Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.This is a revised edition of Fauconnier’s classic book, first published in English in1985. Presents a ground-breaking theory of semantic reference, successfully resolvingmany semantic phenomena which had bedevilledformal approaches.Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.In this volume Fauconnier updates and extends his theory of mental spaces. He alsointroduces his collaborative work with Mark Turner onConceptual Blending.Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E. (1996). Spaces, Worlds and Grammar. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.An edited volume consisting of original articles which address various semantic and grammatical issues making use of Fauconnier’s theoryof mental spaces.。
认知语言学书籍
认知语言学书籍
嘿,朋友!如果你对认知语言学感兴趣,那我可得给你好好推荐几本超棒的书!
先来说说《我们赖以生存的隐喻》这本书吧!它就像一把钥匙,能打开你对认知语言学理解的新大门。
这本书深入探讨了隐喻在我们思维和语言中的重要作用,哎呀呀,你想想看,我们平时随口说的那些话里竟然隐藏着这么多深刻的隐喻,这难道不神奇吗?通过读这本书,你会恍然大悟,原来语言背后有这么多奥秘!
还有《认知语言学导论》,哇哦,这本书简直就是认知语言学的经典之作!它系统地介绍了认知语言学的各个方面,从概念到理论,再到实际应用,一应俱全!就好比是一个知识的宝藏,等你去挖掘。
你难道不想去探索一下这个宝藏里都有什么宝贝吗?
最后一本不得不提的是《语言与认知的空间——认知语义学探索》。
这本书吧,就像是带你走进了一个奇妙的语言和认知的空间,让你在其中尽情遨游。
它会让你深刻体会到语言和认知之间那紧密而奇妙的联系,哎呀呀,这种感觉真的很美妙呢!
相信我,读了这些书,你一定会对认知语言学有更深刻的认识和理解,会让你沉浸其中,享受知识带来的乐趣哟!。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
认知语言学参考资料Aitchison, J. 1987. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition.Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.Anderson, J. R. 1995. Cognitive Psychology and its Implications.New York: W. H. Feeman and Company.Bach, K. 1987. Thought and Reference. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Barsalou, L. W. 1982. Context-independent information and context-dependent information in concepts.Memory & Cognition 10: 82-93.Barsalou, L. W. 1983. Ad hoc categories.Memory & Cognition 11: 211-227.Barsalou, L. W. 1987. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 101-140. Barsalou, L. W. & B. H.Ross. 1986. The roles of automatic and strategic processing in sensitivity to superordinate and property frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12: 116-134.Barsalou, L. W. & J. W.Hutchinson. 1987. Schema-based planning of events in consumer contexts. In P. F. Anderson & M. Wallendorf (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, V ol. 14. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 114-118.Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance.Oxford: Blackwell.Blakemore, D. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Carston, R. 1988. Language and cognition. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, V ol. 3. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 38-68.Croft, W. & A. D.Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language.New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.Fauconnier, G. 1997.Mappings in Thought and Language.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress.Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22: 133-187.Fischer, K. 2000. From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles.New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Fodor, J. A. 1975. The Language of Thought.New York: T. Y. Crowell.Fodor, J. A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Fodor, J. A. 1998.Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Fodor, J. A. & Z. W.Pylyshyn. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28: 3-71.Foster-Cohen, S. H. 2000. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Language Research 16(1): 77-92.Frege, G. 1977. On Concept and Object.In P.Geach& M.Black (eds.),Translations from the Philosophical Writings of GottlobFrege. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Gibbs, R. W. 1987. The relevance of relevance for psychological theory.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: 718-719.Goatly, A. 1994. Register and redemption of relevance theory: The case of metaphor.Pragmatics 4: 139-181.Green, D. W. et al. 1996. Cognitive Science: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Gutt, E.-A. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context.Oxford: Blackwell. Jary, M. 1998. Relevance and the communication of politeness.Journal of Pragmatics30: 1-19.Jaszczolt, K. M.1996a. Relevance and infinity: Implications for discourse interpretation.Journal of Pragmatics 25: 703-722.Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Jordan, M. P. 1998. The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 705-752.Jucker, A. H. 1997. Review on Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 107-119.Lakoff, G. & M.Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By.Chicago: The University of ChicagoPress.Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, V ol. 1-2. Stanford: StanfordUniversity Press.Marmaridou, S. S. A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Marten, L. 2002.At the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface: Verbal Underspecification and Concept Formation in Dynamic Syntax.Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Rouchota, V. & A. H.Jucker (eds.) 1998. Current Issues in Relevance Theory.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Schank, R. & R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Sperber, D. 1994b.The modularity of thought and the epistemology of representation.In L. A.Hirschfeld& S. A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 39-67.Sperber. D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs.Mind and Language 12: 67-83.Sperber, D. 2000. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 117-137.Sperber, D. & D.Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1990.Rhetoric and relevance. In D. Wellbery& J. Bender (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Stanford: StanfordUniversity Press, 140-155.Sperber, D. & D.Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Sperber, D. & D.Wilson. 1996. Fodor’s frame problem and relevance theory: A reply to Chiappe&Kukla. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 19: 530-532.Sperber, D.& D.Wilson. 1997. Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences.Multilingua16: 145-151.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1998a. The mapping between the mental and public lexicon. In P.Carruthers & J. Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 184-200.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1998b. Irony and relevance: A reply to DrsSeto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston&S. Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283-293.Sperber, D. & D.Wilson. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind & Language 17: 3-23.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 2005. Pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17: 353-388. Ungerer, F. & H. J.Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics.London: Longman.Wilson, D. 1999. Relevance and relevance theory. In R. Wilson & F. Keil (eds.), MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 719-722. Wilson, D. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication.In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations.New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 411-448.Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance Theory and lexical pragmatics.Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 15(2): 273-291.Wilson,D. 2004a.Relevance and lexical pragmatics.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 343-60.Wilson, D. 2004b. Relevance, word meaning and communication: The past, present, and future of lexical pragmatics. Modern Foreign Languages (现代外语) 1: 1-13. Wilson, D. 2005a.New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity.Lingua115: 1129-1146.Wilson,D. 2005b.Pragmatics.In F. Jackson& M. Smith (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy.Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 468-501.Wilson,D.&R. Carston. 2008. Metaphor and the ‘emergent property’ problem: A relevance-theoretic treatment. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (2007), 1-40.Wilson, D. & T.Matsui. 1998. Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence and relevance.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 173-200.Wilson, D. & D.Sperber. 1981. On Grice’s Theory of conversation. In P. Werth (ed.), Conversation and Discourse.London: Croom Helm, 155–178.Wilson, D. & D.Sperber. 1988. Representation and relevance. In R. M. Kempson (ed.),Wilson, D. & D.Sperber. 1991b. Pragmatics and modularity. In S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 583–595.Wilson, D. & D. Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1-25.Wilson, D. & D.Sperber. 2002b. Truthfulness and relevance.Mind 111: 583-632.胡壮麟. 2004. 认知隐喻学. 北京: 北京大学出版社.束定芳(主编). 2004. 语言的认知研究-认知语言学论文精选. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.熊学亮. 1999. 认知语用学概论. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.赵彦春. 2003. 认知词典学探索. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.赵艳芳. 2001. 认知语言学概论. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.。