Meta分析的SCI写作模板Discussion
Meta分析SCI写作指南——Discussion
Meta分析SCI写作指南——Discussion讨论几乎是所有SCI写作初学者最头疼的一部分了，不是不知从哪里下手就是写的没有深度。
其实讨论没有固定的模式，看看大牛们写的文章讨论也是五花八门，但是如果你不能像大牛们一样讨论起来得心应手的话，还是乖乖按部就班来写吧，今天我们给大家介绍几个meta分析讨论写作的几个小技巧，看看能不能对您有所帮助呢？第一，第一段不要再大段介绍背景了，可以总结本文的主要研究结果。
注意区分Discussion与Introduction的区别，关于背景的描述放在Introduction里就好了。
第二，总结完本文的主要结果后可以紧跟产生这个结果的原因。
这个原因可以通过阅读纳入文献来分析，比较纳入文献之间方法、研究人群等因素有何差异。
很多时候在纳入文献的讨论部分已经体现出来了，不需要我们再仔细一点一点去挖掘。
第三，可以与已经发表的meta分析比较，但是不能与纳入文献的结果作对比。
这一点是很多初学者都会碰到的误区，但想想其实并不难理解。
一个课题之所以能做meta分析，那说明这个问题还存在争议性，那么我们的纳入文献必定都有正反两方面的结果，而且我们的目的就是合并这些结果，meta分析的结果已经包含了纳入文献的结果，所以再与纳入文献比较是没有任何意义的。
第四，可以从机制入手讨论。
这是大部分文章讨论为了增加研究深度一贯采用的办法，例如，吸烟导致肺癌，可能的机制是吸烟使得人体内一种被称为DNA修复酶(OGG1)的化合物活动能力下降，而OGG1活性降低导致DNA受损加快，修复变慢...。
但是并不是所有的meta分析都适合讨论机制，这一条还要视情况而定，不可盲从。
第五，不要忽略亚组分析及敏感性分析等的结果。
初写meta，我们往往只讨论到了总的结果，却忽略了亚组分析等结果。
这些内容也是很值得讨论的，例如亚组分析及敏感性分析后结果发生了逆转，我们可以讨论下逆转的原因。
第六，局限性的讨论要委婉。
科技论文写作整理系列(7)——Discussion
科技论文写作整理系列(7)——DiscussionAbuck此部分分为―内容－要点－写法－举例‖四部分。
1.内容1-11，对所做的研究工作给予恰当的评价，包括与前人工作的比较。
本工作和前人的工作的关系。
是不是有所创新？在哪一个方面有创意？否则说明作者对该领域的认识程度有限。
2，对于所收集的数据给予充分的分析。
一个好的论文不仅仅是实验数据的罗列，而是在实验的基础上对数据有深刻的分析。
也就是说这些实验说明什么问题，是如何支持作者期望获得的科学结论的。
没有分析的数据就象没有血肉的骨架。
3，指出本工作，或者某种实验手段的局限性。
实事求是的分析本工作的局限性，表明作者对自己工作的自信。
同时也表明作者严谨的科学态度。
由于局限性是客观存在的，讨论局限性不会引起负面影响1-2Evaluation/Assessment: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of your solution.Provide all the measures or evaluation you came up with. Provide all the results of simulations, tests, and any other scheme of assessment. Discuss the limitations.Discussion: Provide a qualitative and quantitative comparison to the other approaches. Take a good look at it as a whole. Relative advantages/disadvantages and limitations (as compared to other works) should be discussed here.Further open problems: Where does this subject go from here? What new grounds and questions are opened? What new ideas are created that could be the subject of further research? If anyone wanted to pursue further the approach that you took, then what kind of things would he consider further?1-3•根据研究结果，•结合基础理论和前人成果，•应用国际国内最新的学说、理论、见解对该课题进行分析、作出解释，•对将来研究有启示•对实验结果受影响的因素进行分析，•对意外发现作出解释、建议和设想1-4⑴背景材料：展开问题的提出；有关本研究的一些基本知识内容（不要离题太远）⑵本实验结果分析：各指标的意义（与文献值比较），结果说明什么问题⑶进一步对结果机理分析：结合文献⑷本工作的意义、结语或小结，进一步提出的新问题1-5I. Discussion (Comment)1. Purpose: to explain the nature and importance of the findings (Answers the questions: "So what?" and "Who cares?")2. Should be the most useful section but is often the weakest3. Begins by summarizing the study and the main results.4. Discusses the implication of the results and what else is known about the problem and its proposed solutions5. Generally includes the literature review6. State the limitations of the study7. List the conclusionsa. Distinguish between clinical and statistical significanceb. In studies with low statistical power, do not mistake inconclusive results for negative results ("absence of proof is not proof of absence")c. Distinguish between supported conclusions and speculation1-6结果和结论部分代表着文章的主要成就和贡献，论文有没有价值，值不值得读者阅读，主要取决于你所获得的结果和所得出的结论。
医学科研SCI论文结论discussion部分的书写技巧
Our findings emphasize the need to continue to promote personal protection measures to reduce the risk of Lyme disease infection. We have identified three reasonable personal measures that may be protective against Lyme disease when practiced: tick checks, bathing, and insect repellents. Performing tick checks within 36 hrs after spending time in the yard may reduce one’s risk as much as 46%. In addition, bathing may reduce one’s risk by up to 57%, and the use of insect repellent may be protective against the disease up to 75%.
We could make these a little
stronger, right?
➢In this study, we have shown that …
Much more
➢Through this work, we have found that … confident! ➢By analyzing X, we discovered that Y …
3. Provide closure and significance (“conclusion”)
meta分析的SCI写作模板—discussion
呕血整理，meta分析的SCI写作模板—discussion今天我们继续给大家带来《Meta分析的SCI写作模板》系列，今天给大家介绍的是文章的最后一部分-讨论部分-Discussion。
这部分的内容主要是先介绍我们的Meta分析的主要结果，解释一下产生主要结果的原因，与其它研究的异同点，本研究的必要性等，以及一些缺点等。
本文先介绍一下对结果的总体描述的表述，列举几个例子，让大家看一下本部分的写作方法。
①The overall goal of a meta-analysis is to combine the results of previous studies to arrive at a summary conclusion about a body of research.It is most useful in summarizing prior research when individual studies are too small to yield a valid conclusion.②In this study,we analyzed the associations between×××and×××using a meta-analysis to obtain a powerful conclusion.To the best of our knowledge,this is the first meta-analysis providing comprehensive insights into the effects of the×××and risk associated with×××.③Meta-analysis has been recognized as an effective method to answer a wide variety of clinical questions by summarizing and reviewing previously published, quantitative research.④Despite the fact that most of the trials had small sample sizes and poor methodological quality,analysis of the pooled data showed a consistently superior effect of×××combined with×××in terms of total effectiveness,when compared to the control groups.⑤The pooled data of×××(postoperative outcomes)suggest that×××was associated with shorter time to×××.Given that there were differences in×××(postoperative patient)management preferences and hospital discharge criteria, whether these potential benefits can be proved in future well designed RCTs is not known.。
meta分析的SCI写作模板
呕血整理——meta分析的SCI写作模板我们在写Meta时，尤其是第一次，可能不知道去如何进行写作，其实一般的Meta分析类文章写作还是相对比较简单的，有一定结构化的东西，只要按一定套路即可。
为此，小编特意从一些高分的SCI原文中整理了一些比较好的句子，大家可以进来看看，目的是让大家能更快的写出高质量的SCI文章。
首先介绍的是前言部分，前言部分一般是先对某些疾病或者药物做一个介绍，包括对人类的危害，发病率或者患病率等等，就是向编辑表明，我们研究这个课题是很有必要，很重要，很有意义的，并且是有争议的，然后引出我们文章的目的。
前面的介绍不同的课题有不同的写法，但是后面怎么描述我们的争议，引出我们的目的一般是大同小异的，下面就给大家介绍几种写法。
①Considering the impact of the×××risk potentially resulting from×××,a number of studies have explored the association between×××and×××. However,individual studies have yielded inconsistent or conflicting findings,possibly caused by limitation sassociated with an individual study.To shed light on these contradictory results and to more precisely evaluate the relationship among×××and×××,we performed a meta-analysis of published studies.②Even though several studies comparing×××and×××have been reported, most are small series with conflicting results.It is still uncertain whether the benefits of×××are restricted to improved×××.We therefore systemically searched and analyzed the available literature to evaluate the efficiency,safety,and potential advantages of×××compared with×××.③The aims of this study are to understand analytically the epidemiological links and association between×××and×××among×××.④There are numerous clinical trials regarding the use of×××for treatment of ×××,with positive results;however,to our knowledge,the potential benefits of ×××for patients with×××,to justify either their recommendation or their clinical role,have not been evaluated.In addition,a large number of studies could potentially be missed if literature searches are restricted to English-only sources. Therefore,we conducted a systematic review to assess the effect of×××on×××.⑤Although several research papers have suggested that×××may be associated with increased×××in×××with×××,no recent systematic review has synthetised the evidence in this regard.A previous systematic review dates back to year×××,while a significant amount of literature has been published after that date.The aim of this work was to systematically review and meta-analyses the evidence on the association between×××and×××in×××.。
呕血整理-Meta分析的SCI写作模板—Discussion（2）
呕血整理-Meta分析的SCI写作模板—Discussion（2）今天我们继续给大家带来《Meta分析的SCI写作模板》系列，今天给大家介绍的是文章的最后一部分-讨论部分-文章的缺点或者不足。
这部分的内容主要是先介绍文章的一些缺点，包括纳入文章的类型(可能并非全部随机对照)，结果(结果可能不理想，可能存在异质性，发表偏倚等)，纳入的人群(纳入的人群可能来自不同的国家，民族等)等。
本文我们将列举几个例子，让大家看一下本部分的写作方法。
①However, some limitations in our meta-analysis should be mentioned. First, our results were based on unadjusted estimates; more accurate outcomes would result from adjustments for other confounders such as gender, age, body mass index, lifestyle, and so on. Second, the studies included in this analysis were insufficient, especially in terms of a subgroup analysis. Thus, potential publication bias is very likely to exist, in spite of no evidence obtained from our statistical tests. Third, language of studies was limited to English, which may result in potential language bias.②A single study may influence the whole results in the sensitivity analysis for the ×××, which suggested our study may be poorly powerful and stable.③The present meta-analysis has the following limitations that must be taken into account. The main limitation is that all the included studies were retrospective, except for two RCTs with small sample sizes.④The shortcomings of this meta-analysis are as follows: 1) some outcome measures data, such as ×××, which were not normally distributed and were reported in the form of median and quartile, and therefore could not be included in the meta analysis; 2) only English language reports have been includedand consequently we may have missing data from important studies published in other languages.。
meta分析范文
meta分析范文Meta-analysis is a statistical technique used to combine the results of multiple studies in order to provide a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of a particular research question. It allows researchers to synthesize the findings of various studies and draw more reliable conclusions than any single study could provide.In this paper, we will discuss the process of conducting a meta-analysis, its advantages, and its potentiallimitations.The first step in conducting a meta-analysis is todefine the research question and establish inclusion and exclusion criteria for the studies to be included in the analysis. This involves identifying the relevant literature, searching for studies that meet the criteria, and then selecting the studies that will be included in the analysis. Once the studies have been selected, the next step is to extract the relevant data from each study and convert itinto a common format that can be used for analysis.After the data has been extracted, the next step is to analyze the data using statistical techniques. Thistypically involves calculating effect sizes, which measure the strength of the relationship between variables, andthen combining the effect sizes from the individual studies to produce an overall estimate of the effect. This estimate can then be used to draw conclusions about the research question and to assess the overall strength of the evidence.One of the key advantages of meta-analysis is that it allows researchers to synthesize the findings of multiple studies, which can provide a more comprehensive andreliable understanding of a particular research question.By combining the results of multiple studies, researchers can increase the statistical power of their analysis and draw more reliable conclusions than any single study could provide. This can be particularly useful when individual studies have produced conflicting results, as meta-analysis can help to identify the sources of the discrepancies and provide a more accurate estimate of the true effect.Another advantage of meta-analysis is that it can help to identify patterns and trends that may not be apparent in individual studies. By combining the results of multiple studies, researchers can identify consistent findings and explore potential sources of variation across studies. This can help to generate new hypotheses and guide future research in the field.Despite its many advantages, meta-analysis also has some potential limitations that should be considered. One potential limitation is publication bias, which occurs when studies with positive results are more likely to be published than studies with negative results. This can lead to an overestimation of the true effect, as the published literature may not accurately reflect the full range of findings on a particular research question. To address this limitation, researchers can use statistical techniques such as funnel plots to assess the presence of publication bias and adjust their estimates accordingly.Another potential limitation of meta-analysis is the risk of including low-quality studies, which can bias theoverall estimate of the effect. To address this limitation, researchers can use inclusion criteria to select only high-quality studies for inclusion in the analysis and conduct sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of their findings.In conclusion, meta-analysis is a powerful tool that can provide a more comprehensive and reliable understanding of a particular research question by synthesizing the findings of multiple studies. By combining the results of individual studies, researchers can increase thestatistical power of their analysis, identify patterns and trends, and draw more reliable conclusions than any single study could provide. However, it is important to consider the potential limitations of meta-analysis and take steps to address them in order to ensure the reliability and validity of the findings.。
18个段落快速写成第一篇SCI论文（二）：Discussion讨论部分
18个段落快速写成第一篇SCI论文（二）：Discussion讨论部分如果说SCI论文的Introduction（引言）部分是个倒三角的思考，那么Discussion（讨论）部分就是一个正三角的思考和写作逻辑，应该从小到大依次展开。
从研究结果的合理性，异常情况以及背后的原理出发，逐步深入分析，自然地得出本研究重要性/意义/通用性/应用价值，响亮收官。
一篇上乘SCI论文的讨论部分，总能够让编辑/审稿人/读者深受启发。
这里我们教大家采用六段法来写SCI的讨论部分。
✅第一段应针对你的结果进行总结。
不要以文献回顾或对所讨论的研究对象进行冗长的讨论开始。
除非这些信息对你的结论有直接影响，否则第一段不应包括这些信息。
即使你想展示这些信息，也不应在本节的第三段之前介绍（见下文）。
你应该具体谈谈你的主要发现，这将是解决引言中提出的问题的发现。
对结果部分数据的引用应限于最重要的数字。
不要重复结果部分的所有数据，也不要在这里引入新的数据。
Discussion的第一段：针对你的结果进行总结。
Zhang, Z., Zhan, Z., Wang, B., Chen, Y.,Chen, X., Wan, C., Fu, Y. and Huang, L., 2020. Archaeal chromatin proteinsCren7 and Sul7d compact DNA by bending and bridging. MBio, 11(3),pp.e00804-20.✅第二段将论文从结论推进到解释。
第一段的主要发现成为第二段的主要结论的基础。
不要超越证据进行推断。
只从目前的调查中得出合理的结论。
紧扣主题：不要偏离讨论的旁白。
如果你有几个主要观点，恭喜你，你可能需要再写一篇或几篇SCI论文。
太多的结论会削弱其中任何一个结论的影响力。
因此，最好是写集中而紧凑的论文，而不是写一篇全面但分散的大作。
✅第三段应说明你的解释是否与其他研究人员的解释一致。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Meta分析的SCI写作模板—Discussion
文章的最后一部分-讨论部分-Discussion。
这部分的内容主要是先介绍我们的Meta分析的主要结果，解释一下产生主要结果的原因，与其它研究的异同点，
本研究的必要性等，以及一些缺点等。
本文先介绍一下对结果的总体描述的表述，列举几个例子，让大家看一下本部分的写作方法。
①The overall goal of a meta-analysis is to combine the results of previous studies to arrive at a summary conclusion about a body of research. It is most useful in summarizing prior research when individual studies are too small to yield a valid conclusion.
②In this study, we analyzed the associations between ×××and ×××using a meta-analysis to obtain a powerful conclusion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis providing comprehensive insights into the effects of the ×××and risk associated with ×××.
③Meta-analysis has been recognized as an effective method to answer a wide variety of clinical questions by summarizing and reviewing previously published, quantitative research.
④Despite the fact that most of the trials had small sample sizes and poor methodological quality, analysis of the pooled data showed a consistently superior effect of ×××combined with ×××in terms of total effectiveness, when compared to the control groups.
⑤The pooled data of ×××(postoperative outcomes) suggest that ×××was associated with shorter time to ×××. Given that there were differences in ×××(postoperative patient) management preferences and hospital discharge criteria, whether these potential benefits can be proved in future well designed RCTs is not known.。