十二怒汉英文赏析
《十二怒汉》电影赏析
6号主张第四次投票
第五位支持无罪的陪审员（2号）
第六位支持无罪的陪审员（6号）
第四次投票结果6:6平
认为无罪
认为有罪
• 4号陪审员自始至终都极为理性与冷静，并 自信于自己的智商。比起3号，他才是认为 被告有罪的一方中最难以说服的。他始终 试图用理性与逻辑证明被告有罪，看来是 最难被说服的。
陪审团需形成统一的决定
（二）第一次投票
第一次投票结果1:11，有罪占优势
认为无罪
认为有罪
八号陪审员
• 陪审团出现结果不一致时有2种解决办法： • 一是，说服少数一方，形成统一意见。 • 二是形成悬案，由法庭另组陪审团。
8号陪审员认为无罪的原因
8号陪审员认为无罪的原因
• 八号陪审员没有什么证据，来证明嫌疑人 无罪，只是觉得用5分钟时间决定一个孩子 的生死而不加以讨论太草率了。
• 5、可以解决律师在侦查阶段会见难问题，侦查阶段办 案人阻挠律师会见犯罪嫌疑人，大多因为正处于逼取口 供的施压时期，怕律师介入犯罪嫌疑人不供或怕律师代 替犯罪嫌疑人向有关机关控告刑讯逼供，揭发刑讯逼供 现象。“零口供”是沉默权与现实刑事诉讼法律制度的 折衷表现形式。
5号陪审员
• 情节发展到这里，12个怒汉 开始了争论，事情陷入了僵 局。
• 如果孩子不是凶手，且证据不足，却对其入罪，那 么，受到影响的会是整个社会，因为每个人都有可 能做到被告席上，当法律无法保证我们的合法权利 的时候，真不敢想象那种情况会是这样，历史上的 宪兵政治和特务政治应该对此作出了充分的说明， 这也是为什么现行世界各国都将疑罪从无作为各国 的司法原则的原因。
• 当不幸有一天，我们被冤枉坐在被告席上 的时候，是应该公诉机关、侦查机关证明 我们有罪呢，还是我们自己证明自己无罪 呢。
12怒汉英文观后感
12怒汉英文观后感《12怒汉》（12 Angry Men）是一部由西德尼·吕美特执导的美国电影，于1957年上映。
该片改编自雷吉纳德·罗斯的同名剧本，讲述了一个陪审团的故事，这个陪审团试着在一个年轻男子被指控谋杀的案件中作出裁决。
作为一部充满紧张与悬疑的法庭电影，它在审判和正义主题上引起了广泛的讨论和思考。
影片开场时，我们的视线直接聚焦于一间陪审室里的12位陪审员。
刚开始时，每个角色都是标准的陪审员模型：白人中产阶级，年龄普遍大于40岁，而且大多数对被告有偏见，自信地认为他有罪。
在接下来的90分钟里，导演通过细致入微的角色和情节塑造，展示了一个智慧与敏锐相互碰撞而又和谐融合的过程。
随着陪审员们开始讨论案件的证据和细节，影片逐渐展现出人性的各个方面。
每个角色代表了不同的观点和价值观，他们之间的对话和辩论让观众有机会思考案件的主观性和客观性。
这个过程中，每个陪审员都表现出了不同程度的成长和变化。
他们需要超越自己的偏见、情绪和个人经验，尝试对案件进行客观公正的评判。
在这部电影中，我们看到了勇敢、坚定和正直的陪审员，他们在自己的立场和执着中对案件进行了深入的研究。
他们不追随众声喧哗，不受困扰于陪审团内部的冲突，而是秉持着对事实真相的追求。
与此同时，我们也看到了不愿改变和顽固的陪审员，他们固执己见，甚至不愿意倾听其他陪审员的论据。
这部电影揭示了人类的情感和个人背景对决策过程的影响。
陪审团成员们纷纷带入过往的背景和经历，这使得他们对案件的评判不可避免地受到主观色彩的影响。
这让观众反思了当我们扮演陪审员时我们是否能够摆脱个人情感和成见，以客观的眼光去审视案件。
除了对案件本身的审判，这部电影还触及到了社会和人性的广泛议题。
例如，影片中有一个角色对被告的种族做出了偏见的评论。
这引发了对种族歧视和偏见的讨论。
这部电影也展示了少数人坚信自己正确的勇气和坚韧，即使面对多数人的不同看法，也能够勇敢地发声。
12怒汉的英文观后感
12怒汉的英文观后感12怒汉是一部以法庭为背景的经典电影，通过展现12位陪审团成员之间的辩论和思维碰撞，揭示了人性的复杂性和法律正义的主题。
观后感是对影片的思考和感悟，以下是我对12怒汉的英文观后感。
The movie "12 Angry Men" is a timeless classic that explores the dynamics within a jury room during a court trial. Through intense discussions and clashes of opinions, the film delves into the complexity of human nature and raises questions about the nature of justice. After watching this thought-provoking film, I was left with a myriad of emotions and reflections.First and foremost, the film reminds us of the essential importance of critical thinking and open-mindedness. The twelve jurors enter the room with their own biases and preconceived notions about the accused. As the deliberations progress, we witness how some jurors allow their personal emotions or prejudices to cloud their judgment, while others carefully examine the evidence and challenge the established consensus.The film also raises questions about the flaws in the justice system. It highlights how easily a person's fate can be determined by the subjective opinions of a group of individuals, each with their own personal baggage. The power dynamics within the jury room become apparent as the lone dissenting juror fights against the initial majority. It serves as a reminder that justice can sometimes be swayed by personal motivations and external pressures, leaving room for potential miscarriages of justice.What struck me the most about the film is its exploration of human nature. Each character represents a different facet of society, demonstrating the complexities of human behavior and the various factors that shape our perspectives. From the strength of personal conviction to the vulnerability of conformity, the film portrays a fascinating spectrum of human emotions and motivations.The film also shines a light on the power of persuasion and effective communication. As the jurors engage in heated debates, we witness the power of compelling arguments, as well as the importance of presenting evidence and fostering an environment conducive to dialogue. It is a testament to the influence that one individual can have on a group, conveying the significance of logical reasoning and persuasive skills.Furthermore, "12 Angry Men" explores themes of empathy and compassion. As the jurors reevaluate the evidence presented during the trial, they begin to understand the significance of the accused's background and the potential biases that may have been at play. This realization prompts a shift in their perspectives and a deeper understanding of the impact their decisions will have on the accused's life. The film serves as a reminder to look beyond surface-level judgments and consider the broader implications of our actions.In terms of the film's structure, its confined setting within the jury room enhances the sense of tension and emotional intensity. The cinematography brilliantly captures the dynamics between the jurors, with close-ups highlighting their facial expressions and body language, revealing the inner turmoil and conflicts they face. The gradual change in lighting and use ofvisual cues subtly mirror the evolving emotions and shifting power dynamics.Overall, "12 Angry Men" is a masterpiece that continues to captivate audiences with its timeless themes and thought-provoking storytelling. The film's exploration of human nature and the flaws within the justice system offer valuable insights into the complexities of society. It serves as a reminder to question our own biases and to approach critical decision-making with an open mind. Ultimately, "12 Angry Men" is a powerful reminder of the importance of justice, empathy, and the potential for individual transformation.。
十二怒汉观后感英文版
十二怒汉观后感英文版在1957年由悉尼．卢曼特执导的《十二怒汉》是探讨美国陪审员制度和法律正义的经典作，本片则是由威廉．弗里德金重新拍摄的电视版，由杰克．莱蒙取代亨利．方达演男主角，其他合演者包括金像奖影帝乔治．C．斯科特。
下面是英文版的《十二怒汉》观后感，欢迎阅读。
十二怒汉观后感英文版As a IMDB movie, originally only read and when the university language class fuzzy again writing film is a very extravagant things, but this afternoon again like a completely blew my mind, giving too many surprises and things will still lead a person to endless aftertastes, on the next.Talk before seen a movie, called the man from Earth (the man from the earth), features a proposed very beautiful view or treason and heresy, by constantly review and logical scrutiny to details of other people's point of view in the opposite direction. The point is that the language of art and clever reasoning, give people the feeling of layers of peeling cocoon. This 12 anger is more in-depth study of human nature and the United States judicial and democratic system.Originally seemingly incontrovertible casebecause the jury has an objection, so an amazing negotiations began. The opposition is a smooth and logical architect, and a producer of the film. The first round of the debate is mainly composed of a It's possible! That led, the boy may be innocent, the witness may be wrong, false testimony could, to a 18 year old boy without thinking directly to the electric chair is a be brutal and inhuman. At this stage, the only point against the success of Davis is to let people get away from the surface of the evidence and their own prejudices, with careful scrutiny of the details of the mind, for the next stage to lay the foundation.In the details of reasoning, Davis has been a breakthrough point and support the knife, when out of pocket knife with almost the same knife, all surprised sound jump, so the evidence will lose credibility, on the knife in the back again to become a breakthrough point. Davis proposed to reproduce the boy murder scenes, so that the boy insisted that the guilty get Davis for demonstration, higher than their own people, manipulation is holding a knife stabbed in the chest from the top down, and from a slum, have seen a lot ofpeople stand up and fight to get stressed such adjustment method, it is a waste of time the tool, familiar boy didn't like this.To discuss the progress on many of the details in advance, such as time difference; the old man can walk out of the bedroom, through the corridor in 15 seconds, the boy rushed out to see the woman; both sides of the nose mark and kept rubbing surface of the eye is myopic. Although there are set close enough to leave the drama to overthrow the testimony of the suspects, but still very appreciated this insight.Another wonderful place is a lot of analysis of human nature of the plot, such as the first to support the Davis people to explain why the old man would do the perjury, that is because of a comic book unknown to the public suddenly one day to get attention, others want to refer to his views, and flattered him with long battle, trying to hide myself the lame. It can be said that this is a weakness of human nature, in order to other people's attention or respect, at the same time distort the facts.Confrontation and Davis and his resolute opponents,Davis said a press button to personally chair is sadistic, who shouted I will kill rage came forward to beat Davis, you! And Davis were all pulled at him, calmly questions, you don't really want to kill me, right let him have nothing to say?. Clever people to move the stone to hit their feet very exciting, but the more exciting is the director here to give a very clear view, that is, an idiom in china.From A to Z 3 opponents is not for evil, frowning, talking is intolerable or pessimistic, but strong scream as you want the boy to death immediately said, this man has become a justice in the case when the correct, but when the error is a disaster. How can one be able to act as a judge of the fate of others by letting them have their own prejudices and that they have no prejudice? Only a disregard for human life.The discussion in the final is firmly opposed to face their own feelings with his photo when collapse over, perhaps the boy really killed my father, but this is a shining glory of human nature of the trial, the greatness of the judicial system reflects the most incisive. Especially with China nearly thousands ofyears of autocratic centralization comparison, and even become the decision habit, look at a building built not demolished and rebuilt for several years, I can not help worrying, Chinese how many innocent common people Yuansi, how many wise decisions in authoritarian pressure die, many seemingly overweeningly ambitious construction plan also in the pipeline?十二怒汉观后感英文版This Indoorsman empty and lonely months come out a fart, this essay is moving around the brain exercises, do not take it seriously."12 angry men", epee no front, delicate workAbout the film itselfOf all the movies I've seen, "12 fury" is not my favorite top ten, but it's definitely the most boring I've ever seen in the top 10. The whole film is only one scene, 12 men, hours of dialogue, or a black and white film. However, it is cattle, cattle cattle, with the most boring way, about the most exciting story.The whole film is about a murder trial. A bad boy was charged with the murder of his father, hear the voice of the old man across the street downstairs, witnessed the process of women's murder knife,unconvincing alibi, seems to have been placed in the electric chair in front of the child will be. 12 members of the jury will determine the child's life and death, but they have to make a unified ruling, the results can be effective. At the beginning of the film, 11 people think that the child is guilty, only one out of respect for life, that the case pending. After hours of hard work, all the evidence is classified as "reasonable doubt", that is to say, there is a reason why it cannot be fully established. The boy was acquitted.The story itself does not have any complicated place, neither brain nor burning suspense. However, the film, there is a kind of good. This is a typical confined space film, but there is no usually confined space film repression. The plot is fascinating, as if an invisible hand, grabbed in the viewer's mind, to promote the development of the plot. Then the hand is hidden very deep, you can only cast a tepid performance, and the degree of relaxation rhythm to feel it. It is difficult to point out that it is in which point, the plot, so that the merits of a step forward. It makes a "mission impossible" completed, but does not show abrupt. Likewarm boiled frog, unconsciously, has been the director of the road.On the confined space of the film, you can take the "12 angry Han" and "sniper phone booth" to do a comparison.The latter is my personal narrow viewing experience, in recent years considered very good confined space film. It is more intense than the "12 angry Han", more depressed, more popular. However, the latter of the wonderful, is the process of viewing the obvious exciting, the director deliberately for the tension (of course, it is not easy). It will be the hero and the audience, and placed under the gun, like a gun under the deer hunter. Every thought, every action, will determine your life and death. So it's hot, hormones are always high.The former is different, the director will be shot, placed on the spectator's point of view, and without any emotional color. Group play is also very difficult to bring the audience into the sense. This kind of calm angle of view, can let a person look at the whole process more calmly. The former is like the slalom, the latteris watching the scenery is better, but also the reader's taste.About humanityThe director cut the case in the form of a jury, but also brought another narrative convenience, no matter what kind of decisions made by the 12 angry men, will not have any impact on their own, they are bystanders. Moreover, the restriction of 12 people, a person's decision, the role of both large and small. This is like 100 thousand people pulling the hair of a person, everyone will think, he pulled out a hair of others will produce what kind of impact on the people, but when tenth million individuals pulled over the last hair, who is responsible for this thing? The individual in the collective judgment, are more likely to get a sense of security even moral, ah q would say, I feel the monk can not be touched? As a result, the only thing that can restrain the 12 anger is the moral of the individual, respect for life, the fear of the law, and the American dream of American pride. However, it is for the respect of other people's lives, the value of the personal status of citizens, can better reflect thereason why the "social man" noble.On Jurisprudence11:1, does not represent the overwhelming victory, the minority to the majority, also did not see so reasonable. Let a few people speak freely, is a fair basis.十二怒汉观后感英文版"The twelve fury", a black and white film that was shot in the 50s of the last century, still holds the top spot in the list of legal films. The filming of the film is now still seems to be very good or even fresh, a jury of twelve people to discuss the scene occupies the vast majority of the film. The basic circumstances of the case is almost a convicted juvenile patricide after the trial requires twelve man jury made unanimous verdict. Finally, after a long and bitter debate, the kind of people in the aura of human nature under the leadership of the hero to the boy to freedom.A movie is great, it must be that it allows everyone to find their own interpretation and indirect exposure to real life. What does the film say? The responsibility of the rights and obligations of unity, Americanjudicial system, "would rather let ten thousand can not kill the wrong one" judicial policy on human, fine, deep dig of character psychology analysis, inference of life precious goodness of life, respect, in the face of adversity to find a breakthrough in the actual combat skills, logical reasoning method and so on. Among them, my most shocking is the jury in the system of human feelings and legal justice in the game between the precise performance of the game.First of all, from the significance of the establishment of the jury system. As everyone knows, the jury system is a more common in the countries of Anglo American law system for the realization of democracy and set up the court ruling, but in this case is obviously that consisting of 6-12 people, a case of a group, decide whether the defendant guilty of petty jury. The task of the jury is to find the truth, to seek the defendant's heart, to judge whether the law is fair, and to fight against the dictatorship and oppression of the government. Judging from the case, twelve different personalities, different origins of the jury finally completed this sacred mission, although theprocess is full of hardships and disputes, although meager pay.Obviously, the jury system establishment greatly to the "people" will have reflected the way, representative of the first throw to the "people" problems, from the set goal, one of the ways of expression also embody the will of the consciousness of law. This movie is a result to the satisfaction of all, "people's democracy" successful practice, worthy of praise.It can be said that this kind of non professional, only the simple way to judge the feelings of law to a certain extent reflects the demographic characteristics and values of a society, naturally has a natural rationality and institutional affinity. This kind of justice can make the majority of the people in this society to be convinced, and not like the law of the general cold ruthless, the decision was also less likely to be overturned. This is also the system from the Anglo Saxon era has been widely used and today there are still many reference reasons.The next step is to discuss whether the justicebased on human judgment is the justice required on the legal balance.In the movie "Twelve Angry Men", each juror all have some worry, anxious to help their own work and entertainment, because of some emotional problems naturally to the case of the boy off, some because of hot weather to escape from the narrow discussion room...... All these practical problems are unable to avoid or even to be taken into account when the jury system is set up. But this is real life. As the most common people, the jury will be influenced by all kinds of personal and environmental factors.A great movie is that it takes all kinds of factors affecting the justice of Law -- or clear or vague to show in front of the audience, the audience from the heart to feel, if oneself is in jury, it is very difficult to guarantee that complete justice. Just one example, in seemingly irrefutable evidence, even lawyers are too lazy to defend for the boy, the judge is also a lazy way, that will make everyone believe: the child First impressions are strongest had killed his father and have to pay the price to be sent to thechair in the end has not yet started life. That is why there is a big gap between 11 and 1, which is likely to have an impact on the environment.It is a little question although it is difficult to have a keen insight into matters but people-oriented "actor has been discussed by expanding, finally let more and more jurors tend to believe that the boy innocence. But this calm person in reality is very rare, if we depend on every case in each group the jury can have a "hero" to calm to control, it is not realistic! As one of the judges in the film said to himself, "it's a little bit of a heart attack" if it's a long time to change into another jury. Just imagine, as a result, the jury system has become a kind of terrible, if the jury random selection will lead to two completely different results for the case even for a young life and death, let the life in the legal system of the people and how to maintain adequate sense of security and justice of law faith?So I think that any system has its own defects, the rationality of its existence and its inevitable, certainly not in personal feelings or political stanceover highly or completely system, the disadvantages and system optimization is the right path of human progress. It may also be a more than half an hour to convey the meaning of the film more far-reaching.Finally, it is worth mentioning that the opening and the end of the film is very interesting, with the film language1.十二怒汉观后感英文版2.十二怒汉观后感英文3.十二怒汉观后感英语4.十二怒汉观后感中英版5.精选十二怒汉观后感6.看不见的好朋友读后感怎么写7.坚定信念超越自我演讲稿200字8.什么的变化作文400字年重庆开学第一课观后感。
十二怒汉英语观后感
十二怒汉英语观后感English:Watching "12 Angry Men" was a powerful and thought-provoking experience. The film successfully captured the tension and drama of a jury deliberating over a seemingly open-and-shut case. Each character brought their own biases and prejudices to the table, making for compelling conflicts and moments of introspection. The gradual unraveling of the truth and the eventual realization of the jurors' duty to seek justice rather than expedience was both gripping and inspiring. The film's simple setting and focus on dialogue highlighted the importance of critical thinking and empathy in decision-making, urging viewers to question their assumptions and consider multiple perspectives. Overall, "12 Angry Men" serves as a timeless exploration of justice, human nature, and the power of a single voice to make a difference.中文翻译:观看《十二怒汉》是一次强大而发人深省的经历。
十二怒汉观后感英语作文200词
《十二怒汉》观后感：正义的力量与陪审团的责任Having watched the经典法庭戏剧 "Twelve Angry Men," I was deeply moved by the intense debate and the unwavering quest for truth among the jurors. This movie, set entirely within a courthouse room, showcases the power of perseverance and the importance of jury duty.The story revolves around a jury of twelve men, eachwith their own prejudices and biases, as they attempt to reach a verdict on a murder case. At first glance, the evidence seems clear-cut, pointing to the defendant's guilt. However, one juror, Number 8 (played by Henry Fonda), isnot convinced. He challenges the assumptions of his fellow jurors, sparking a debate that lasts for hours.As the debate ensues, each juror is forced to examine their own prejudices and assumptions. They delve into the details of the case, questioning the validity of the evidence and the motives of the witnesses. The film showcases how easily people can be swayed by initial impressions and how crucial it is to question those impressions.What struck me the most was the determination of Juror Number 8. He faced intense opposition and ridicule, but he never gave up. His perseverance and unwavering belief in the importance of jury duty inspired me. His actions remind us that each individual has the power to make a difference, even in seemingly hopeless situations.The film also highlights the importance of critical thinking and objective analysis. In today's world, where information is constantly flooding in from all directions, it's crucial to have the ability to filter through the noise and arrive at a rational conclusion. "Twelve Angry Men" teaches us that we should never accept things at face value and always question the motives and assumptions behind the information we receive.In conclusion, "Twelve Angry Men" is a powerful reminder of the importance of jury duty and the role of the individual in society. It teaches us the value of perseverance, critical thinking, and objective analysis. The film鼓励我们 to question our assumptions, challenge authority, and always strive for the truth.**《十二怒汉》观后感：正义的力量与陪审团的责任**观看经典法庭戏剧《十二怒汉》后，我深受触动。
十二怒汉观后感英语
十二怒汉观后感英语《十二怒汉》主要讲述12个陌生的普通人组成了一个陪审团，决定一个贫民窟的男孩的生死。
下面是英语的《十二怒汉》观后感，欢迎阅读。
十二怒汉观后感英语Before see comments, said that in XX the Russian remake version beyond the original, so I look at the Russian version, look after the feeling is more general, it is necessary to have a look at the original beauty. In a word: the 1957 edition is the peak!The 57 edition of 100 minute, 07 edition 160 min.. More than one hour to come, mainly the personal story of each juror. Yes, the 07 edition of the jury to make every judgment is based on personal experience, and the 57 version of the sentence according to the clues itself, so the 07 version looks more tired, the content is more verbose.But the 07 version will focus on domestic people's livelihood, many domestic situation or projections of each section of history, and personal experience about the lines of the film full of flesh and blood, very full, this is very great. Unfortunately, I'm not a Russianand I'm not too cold about these things. In contrast, the 57 edition of the rhythm of a lot faster, at very good.One thing is very rare, two versions have successfully created a different image of the 12 jurors, character, no soy sauce characters. But the 07 version did not copy the 57 version of the character set, the two sides clash also appeared different moves (07 edition of "guilty" leaders of hypnosis is really good! Impressive. I want to point out the special field this section , version 07 using multi camera editing and more messy sharp props, well made a tense atmosphere, very appetizing, this period of more than 57 more attractive.In the shooting intention, the 57 edition is onlyto restore the truth of the incident, to defend the law and justice, the 07 version is more humane and law whois more advanced thinking, giving the audience more room for reflection. Turn the film, can keep the original taste too difficult, can be improved to adaptto today's mass is more difficult, the 07 edition did great.On the reasonableness of narrative, version 57 ormore. The 57 edition of a list of the various court testimony and exhibits, audience and jury information synchronization. The 07 edition of each clue appears, you have to wait for a gentleman to finish the story, the debate is not the next one, then how do you explain the xxxxx it, completely put the audience in a passive position.Good suspense novel, should put all the clues are listed, the last time the secret, the audience should say "ah! This is so! We saw the clue! Can not be inferred!" And should not be what clues do not give you, secret, the audience said, "I do not know this thing!" And then the author retorted, "I didn't say nothing about it"In the story of fluency, the 57 edition is also more outstanding, the film successfully put all the camera frame died in a room. While the 07 version of the continuous growth of the Chechen juvenile fragments, continue to play back flash. Although it has enriched the content of the film, they have distracted me. Fortunately, the jury's personal story is dictated not shoot out with location, otherwise I really fell asleep.Let's get back to the score. For so many years and 57 years, MGM should be very mature, but the film's music is the greatest degree of narrowing the score, the total length of not more than five minutes. The five minute soundtrack is an understatement, symbolically set the mood, although not abrupt, not redundant, but also no color, no touching. I think the score can be taken away, and the rest.By the way of acting. But I first talk about another point: 57 edition and 07 edition of the jury have no names, the 57 edition of the 12 jurors is sitting by serial number, I can recognize, but the 07 version of the seat is a mess, I don't know who is who...... Well, that's not the point. Well, let's talk about acting.The head of the innocent - juror number 8 (Henry Fonda) is very upright, sitting posture stance is also very firm, giving a sense of stability. When the guilty leaders - juror number 3 (no - name) to demonstrate he assassination moves very calm, do not move a mountain. Have good gas. 3, the performance is also very good, he is the most stubborn, portrayed every word and actionis in place, and finally he as a father, standing in his father's position changed his mind, but also touching. And the brother asked in glasses, when a huge forehead oozing sweat, the acting is terrific. By the way, the 07 version of the innocent leader looks like Henry, but the expression of a lot of kindness, the tone is very soft and soft, from the beginning of the beginning of decent tough.I personally love the 57 version, in my heart it is the peak.十二怒汉观后感英语Russian version has a strong sense of subtlety.I never love political overtones, did not think this movie was involved in a war of national social factors and so on, more than two hours of film has let me unable to stop procrastinating, do something else, watch more than 8 hours, it was very.The story is a Chechen boy killed stepfather was brought to court, 12 jurors in a small room from only one person that he was innocent, the people put forward all kinds of evidence of doubt, finally everyone voted innocent boy. Almost everyone's background, ideas,opinions, etc..I do not say this movie is good or not, anyway, for political white ethnic confrontation problem has always been an insulator. It is said that after the first vote, there was a man who was not guilty, because he thought he could not be so hasty to send the child to the guillotine, so he proposed to carry out second anonymous voting, a person has also been acquitted.In this section I can not understand, though it should be the expression of real name and anonymous can change a person's decisions, do not blindly follow the crowd, but after the voting, the people immediately stand out is their own investment, which will soon be exposed "defection", also really can. In particular, the argument is not to take the child's life away.Heard that the black and white version 1957 better, so the next day is the turning point of view.From the rhythm, indeed very good grasp. Pinch out all kinds of unnecessary plot, is completely 12 people for each child to put forward their own justifications.Everything is at the center: if the child is likely to be innocent, he should not be convicted of the crime.The United States Justice, I have seen in the description of Linda to be truly understand, this movie is very perfect to show the American judicial philosophy: I would rather let one thousand, not kill the wrong one.In this story, every juror has no name, did not find out who is the real murderer, (because the Russian version of the real estate business, demolitions) discrimination the boy's identity is a slum origin, rather than racial conflicts......Until the last we walked out of the court, there are only two of the most important to insist on the innocent boy reported the name of each other, no phone, no address, there will be no intersection. From the people, back to the people.Space seems to be better.十二怒汉观后感英语Read the drama "12 people", and came back to review the United States under the old film of the year twelve, "the anger of the 57 Han".The story is very simple, a child, the film is colored, the drama did not appear, was accused of murdering his father. The family lived in the slums,in the eyes of some people from generation to generation are criminals and bad ass villain, natural. And all the evidence points to the child as the murderer. The draw for the 12 jurors, all staff have what occupation, 11 people think children guilty, only Henry Fonda architects think of doubt, although he is not very sure. As a result, an increasing number of jurors saw the suspect in the case and voted to pass.The result is not important, the process can glimpse the essence of Democracy: defend everyone's right to freedom of speech (Note: should be everybody's birthright, rather than the gifts of others, power) this person is either young or old, poor or rich, or who is ru. Democracy is the freedom to give everyone the full expression of their views. Of course, from this story can also be seen, small people, muddle along without any aim of moral justice or a sense of super guard unknown to the ordinary people are likely to be the representation of fudge, may also be in the democratic system under control. So, I agree, in the overall quality of the public is not high, the democracy is likely to fail, because many people vote not worthseveral Steamed Buns, or a lot of people do not know what is the election of a large number of individual shares, so after the collapse of the Soviet Union to the public ownership of private ownership by capitalists acquisition the situation may also occur in the family who have an ulterior motive power.After the liberation of China, there have been grassroots democracy experiment, which is Liu Shaoji pushed, but because of the resistance of the hair, did not push down. Now the community election, there are a lot of people say it is a formality, but from a positive point of view, this is not a democratic education, at least let everyone know how is the process of election. After a few years of your community appeared in a car with the big horn canvassing, do propaganda scenes, is very likely. At this time, democracy really into the lives of ordinary people, that is, democratic life. I met several people, without exception, and they talk of democracy in Taiwan, elected, they are not interested in, it is said that the Taiwan few young people are interested in politics; but in the mainland, in the premise of not achieveuniversal suffrage, politics seems to often is a topic of gossip for you talk about the. This is not because, people naturally than Taiwanese people interested in politics, just like to put you in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau, you think too little oxygen, need oxygen, but in the plain here, you will not care about what the air is. This is a scarce resource in economics. After the democratic life, everyone has become commonplace, It is quite common for a part of life, so everyone's interest naturally low, rather than talk about the star's private life is stimulated.Look at the handling of drama and movies, including the plot lines are exactly the same, but in the scene of the atmosphere, it reflects the different understanding of democracy under the two kinds of social systems. The drama is full of black background, spacious and solemn, express a kind of democracy and the divine worship, understanding of democracy from the mouth of a jury in the mouth, with the obvious meaning of religion. The scene is a small room with a narrow, is a sultry fidgety summer afternoon, twelve men crowded in a small space, discuss a majority of peoplethink a foregone conclusion, nature is not love. And one of the twelve fans, boss, advertisers are logical to have these occupation identity of a life of the background. Their tone of voice is also relatively soft and casual, although there are arguments, confrontation, but to give the feeling that this is a real life scene, their argument is part of their lives. On the stage of the jury is clearly an ideal space, let the audience start to think, in such a solemn place, the nature is a heavy topic, 12 people take is also sacred and arduous responsibility. This is a religious scene. I do not deny the 12 jurors responsibility is sacred and arduous, but in a democratic society, this responsibility has been a part of their lives, without the need for a special ceremony to worship.I think I should make it clear that the issue of democratic life, the next time to discuss the issue of democratization of life.。
十二怒汉观后感英文
十二怒汉观后感英文After watching the classic film "12 Angry Men," I am left with profound thoughts and emotions. The movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, takes place in a single room where twelve jurors deliberate the fate of a young man accused of murder. The gripping storyline, masterful acting, and thought-provoking themes have all left an indelible impression on me.One of the most remarkable aspects of "12 Angry Men" is its powerful portrayal of the human psyche and the complex dynamics that emerge in a confined space. The twelve jurors, each with their own biases, beliefs, and personalities, are forced to confront their deepest prejudices and rethink their initial judgments.The film beautifully captures the tension and conflicts that arise during deliberations. The initial vote reveals that eleven jurors are convinced of the young man's guilt, while one, played by Henry Fonda, has reasonable doubt. What ensues is a battle of wills and a clash of ideologies as Fonda's character challenges the group's consensus and demands a thorough examination of the evidence.As the jurors engage in heated discussions, their personal baggage and unresolved issues come to the fore. Their biases towards race, social class, and personal experiences heavily influence their perceptions of the accused. Lumet masterfully exposes the flaws in the justice system, highlighting how preconceived notions and personal prejudices can influence the outcome of a trial.Furthermore, "12 Angry Men" serves as a powerful critique of conformity and the dangers of a mob mentality. As Fonda's character persists in his quest for justice, he faces resistance from those who are more interested in a quick verdict rather than a fair one. The film raises the question of individual responsibility and the importance of critically examining evidence, even when it goes against the majority opinion.The performances in "12 Angry Men" are nothing short of brilliant. Each actor brings depth and nuance to their respective characters, further enhancing the film's impact. Henry Fonda's restrained and resolute portrayal of Juror 8 is particularly noteworthy. He embodies calm rationality in the face of overwhelming opposition, effectively challenging the other jurors' biases and forcing them to question their assumptions.The film's direction deserves high praise. Lumet expertly utilizes the confined space of the jury room to intensify the dramatic tension. Through carefully crafted shots and camera angles, he captures the jurors' emotions and reactions, allowing the audience to engage fully with the unfolding drama.In the end, "12 Angry Men" offers a powerful message about the importance of empathy, critical thinking, and the pursuit of justice. It reminds us that everyone is entitled to a fair trial, regardless of their background or circumstances. The film encourages us to question our own biases, challenge the status quo, and advocate for a more just society.It is worth noting that "12 Angry Men" was made over six decades ago, yet its themes remain relevant today. In a world plagued by social and political divisiveness, the film serves as a stark reminder of the necessity toovercome our differences and work towards common understanding and justice.In conclusion, "12 Angry Men" is an extraordinary film that explores the complexities of the human psyche, the dangers of conformity, and the pursuit of justice. Its timeless themes, compelling performances, and expert direction make it a cinematic masterpiece that continues to resonate with audiences. After watching this film, one cannot help but reflect on the fragility of justice and the power of individual conviction.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
reason because he has been physically harmed by his teenaged son, and, consequently, views all teenagers, including the defendant, as aggressive and reckless enough to commit murder. NO5. The one fellow (NO5) who grew up in a rough neighborhood, where he witnessed numerous knife fights, is the only one who sees any problem in assuming that the defendant could have made the stab wound found.
material evidence-one unusual switch knife the boy’s missing knife and the murderous weapon are the same style. Human testimony 1.) the old man who lives under the room where the killing took place. At ten minutes after twelve, he heard a loud noise which sounded like a fight. Then he heard the kid yell out, “I’m going to kill you!” A second later, he heard the body hit floor. He ran to the door, opened it up, and saw the kid running down the stairs and out of the house. The coroner fixed the time the time of death at around midnight. 2.) the woman across the street. She saw the kid stick his knife into his father’s chest. In court, they’ve proved at night if you look through the windows of an el train when the lights were out, you can see what’s happening on the other side. 3.)the boy No one in the house saw him leave at 11:30, no one at the theater identified him and he couldn’t even remember the names of the movies he saw. motive Testifiers heard an argument and the father hit the boy twice. criminal record At 10, the boy was in children’s court. At 15, he was in reform school. He’s been arrested for mugging, picked up for knife-fighting.
NO6. The one juror (NO6）who had done contract work by the elevated
subway was the only one in a position to question what one of the witnesses might or might not have heard.
circumstantial and the boy deserves a fair deliberation, upon which he starts questioning the accuracy and reliability of the only two witnesses to the murder, the fact that the knife used in the murder is not as unique as assumed (he produces an identical one from his pocket), and the overall shady circumstances.
Votes: 12 Times: 6 Results:11:1；10:2；8:4；6:6；3:9；1:11
Question 2
List the evidence and the contradictions.
Evidence for guilty
Reasonable doubt for not guilty ( contradictions)
1). material evidence- the knife: No.8 showed his knife which looked exactly as the same as the murderous weapon and there were no fingerprint left on the knife. 2.）Human testimony A.] old man a.)It was not possible for the old man to hear the boy’s yelling because the el had been going by the old man’s widow for at least 6 seconds before the body fell and the noise of the el was so loud. b.) almost everybody have said that he wanted to kill somebody when he was very angry but he didn’t really mean that. What’s more, if the boy really killed his father, it’s not wise to say that so loud. c.) According to the diagram of the apartment, No.8 had recreated the scene and proved that the old man who dragged one foot couldn’t get from his bedroom to the front door in 15 seconds so he couldn’t see the boy beat it downstairs. B.]woman’s eyesight She has two marks on her nose and she kept rubbing them in the court. So may be she is near-sighted and only saw a blur. C.]boy The boy didn’t remember the details of the movie because he was under great emotional stress (he was questioned in the kitchen of his apartment when the body of his father was lying on the floor of his bedroom). 3.) The motive is not strong: the boy was born in a slum and the violence is practically a normal state of affairs with him. So two slaps in the face couldn’t proved him into committing murder. 4.) the absence of proof Time of death: about midnight The boy went to a movie at about 11:30 and returned home at about 3:10 5.) it was not so wise for the boy to do these things if he did kill his father by his knife. a.) he came back home after the time of hid father’s death. b.) he left his knife at crime scene c.) his loud yelling 6.) the wound of the boy’s father It’s very hard for the boy to stab down into his father’s chest because he is 5 feet 7 inches and his father is six the first to support Juror 8, not necessarily
believing the accused is not guilty but feeling Juror 8 deserves the opportunity for discussion.