英语专业社会语言学论文 socialinguistics

合集下载

Sociolinguistics社会语言学

Sociolinguistics社会语言学

5). Social dialect: language use among different social groups in a variety of
social contexts. ①~⑧
1
研究范围的大小或角度分别如下:
1.Diglossia and bilingualism
2. Standard and nonstandard language
2)The important characteristic of a speech community is that the members of the group must interact linguistically with other members of the community.
3. Five sections
1). Language variation: general introduction regarding language variation and the situational use of language.①~⑥
2). Standard and nonstandard language: examine language variation in
language variation and language use.
Contents:
1. Speech community
2. Speech variety
3. Regional variation
4. Social variation
5. Stylistic variation
6. Idiolectal variation
2) A social group: besides regionally, a social group may distinguish

socialinguistics

socialinguistics

Sociolinguistics
refers to any study of language in relation to society. It can be defined as the study of correlations between linguistic variables, and nonlinguistic variables such as the social class of speakers, their age, sex etc.(p79)
Language and Culture
Language
influences thought and culture,Language varies in categories and concepts, thus reflecting the different world views of different language users, that is, culture and thought are conditioned by language
Sociolinguistics---a
sub-field of linguists that studies the relation between language and society, between the uses of language and the social structures in which the users of language live.(p79)
Culture
influences language,Every language is a part of a culture. As such, it can not but serve and reflect cultural needs. When a culture experiences radical changes, the vocabulary also undergoes corresponding alterations

社会语言学论文

社会语言学论文

Viewing the Movie My Fair Lady from SociolinguisticPerspectiveby寇佳艳School of TourismXi'an International Studies UniversityXi’an, China2010Viewing the Movie My Fair Lady from Sociolinguistic PerspectiveAbstractMy Fair Lady is a classic movie, which has already been appreciated too much from the viewpoint of literature and translation, but few analysis are from linguistic viewpoint. It is also acknowledged that this movie is a good example of sociolinguistics. This paper is to analysis their dialogue in the film from sociolinguistic perspective. To be specific, this paper will discuss several sociolinguistic aspects by analyzing their dialogue and these aspects are language and social class, language and gender and language planning.摘要《窈窕淑女》是一部经典电影,许多学者已经从文学和翻译学角度对这部电影做了赏析,但很少有评析是以社会语言学角度出发的。

这部电影也是有关社会语言学一个很好的教材。

英语语言学毕业论文(精选多篇)

英语语言学毕业论文(精选多篇)

英语语⾔学毕业论⽂(精选多篇)英语语⾔学毕业论⽂(精选多篇)第⼀篇:英语专业毕业论⽂:社会语⾔学the definition of sociolinguistics and its characteristic外语系06接本6班尹珊珊24号[abstract]sociolinguistics is a term including the aspects of linguistics applied toward the connections between language and society, and the way we use it in different social situations. it ranges from the study of the wide variety of dialects across a given region down to the analysis between the way men and women speak to one another. sociolinguistics often shows us the humorous realities of human speech and how a dialect of a given language can often describe the age, sex, and social class of the speaker; it codes the social function of a language.[key words] sociolinguisticssociolinguistics variationsocial function [content]sociolinguistics is the study of the effect of any and all aspects of society, including cultural norms, expectations, and context, on the way language is used. it also studies how lects differ between groups separated by certain social variables, e.g., ethnicity, religion, status, gender, level of education, etc., and how creation and adherence to these rules is used to categorize individual socio-economic classes. as the usage of a language varies from place to place, and language usage varies among social classes. it is socialists that sociolinguistics studies.the study of language variation is concerned with social constraints determine language in its contextual environment. code-switching is the term given to the use of different varieties of language in different social situations. sociolinguistic differs from sociology of language in that the focus of sociolinguistics is the effect of the society on the language, while the latter’s focus is on the language’s effect on the society. while the study of sociolinguistics is very broad, there are a few fundamental concepts on which most sociolinguistic inquiries depend. sociolinguistics is different from many of the other branches of linguistics in that it studies external as opposed to internal language. internal language applies to the study of language on the abstract level, or in the head, put simply. external language applies to language in social contexts, or outside the head. this distinction is important, because internal language analyses, such as syntax and semantics, operate1on the assumption that all native speakers of a language are quite homogeneous in how they process and perceive language. external language fields, such as sociolinguistics, attempt to explain why this is in fact not the case. these two approaches, while distinct, complement each other in practice.understanding language in society means that one also has to understand the social networks in which language is embedded. this may apply to the macro level of a country or a city, but also to the inter-personal level ofneighborhoods or a single family.sociolinguistics as a field distinct from dialectology was pioneered through the study of language variation in urban areas. whereas dialectology studies the geographic distribution of language variation, sociolinguistics focuses on other sources of variation, among them class. class and occupation is one of the most important linguistic markers found in society.one of the fundamental findings of sociolinguistics, which has been hard to disprove, is that class and language variety are related. as can be implied from the example below, the working class tends to speak less standard language. the lower, middle, and upper middle class will in turn speak closer to the standard. however, the upper class, even members of the upper middle class, may often speak ‘less’ standard than the middle class. this is because not only class, but class aspirations, are important. men and women, on average, tend to use slightly different language styles. these differences tend to be quantitative rather than qualitative. that is, to say that women make more minimal responses than men is akin to saying that men are taller than women. the initial identification of a women’s register was by robin lakoff in 1975, who argued that the style of language served to maintain women’s role in society. a later refinement of this argument was that gender differences in language reflected a power difference. however, both these perspective have the language style ofmen as normat ive, implying that women’s style is inferior. more recently, deborah tannen has compared gender differences in language as more similar to ‘cultural’ differences. comparing conversational goals, she argued that men have a report style,aiming to communicate factual information, whereas women have a rapport style, more concerned with building and maintaining relationships. such differences are pervasive across mediums, including face-to-face conversation, written essays of primary school children, email, and even toilet graffiti. communication styles are always a product of context, and as such, gender differences tend to be most pronounced in single-gender groups. one explanation for this, is that people accommodate their language towards the style of the person they are interacting with. thus, in a mixed-gender group, gender differences tend to be less pronounced. a similarly important observation is that this accommodation is usually towards the language style, not the gender of the person. that is, a polite and empathic male will tend to be accommodated to on thebasis of their being polite and empathic, rather than their being male. sociolinguistics has drawn more and more attention since it became an independent discipline in mid 1960s. but scholars from various disciplines look at sociolinguistics from different perspectives, and carry out sociolinguistic study in different ways. this paper tries to understand sociolinguistics in terms of its definitions and the scope of sociolinguisticstudy to point o ut the lack of comprehensiveness in fishman’’s view on the definition of sociolinguistics.参考⽂献:《社会语⾔学概论》戴庆厦主编商务印书馆《社会语⾔学概论》祝畹瑾编著湖南教育出版社.《语⾔学概论》杨信彰⾼等教育出版社第⼆篇:英语语⾔学论⽂题⽬英语语⾔学论⽂题⽬13论国际商务谈判中的语⾔交际技巧33成⼈世界的童话——从⽂体学⾓度解析现今童话再度流⾏的现象49论⽂化差异与英汉商标互译55浅谈英汉句⼦结构差异59诗意的美和喜剧性幽默62试论⼴告英语的语⾔特点65统觉团对英语初学者词汇学习的影响67外语学习中应该重视中介语的作⽤69新闻报道中的转述动词研究73英汉禁忌语、委婉语的对⽐研究74英汉数字习语的对⽐研究76英译汉中词序的变动78英语⼴告的语⾔特征80英语双关语汉译的可译性限度101词义演变的原因与⽅式137从汉语中英语借词的翻译看⽂化交流138从价值观转换看斯佳丽的⾓⾊特征142从礼貌准则看中英⽂化的异同146从习语看英汉民族的⽂化差异149从英语⼈名中看性别歧视157动词过程类型的选择和话语隐性态度的表达161对母语在英语写作中词汇负迁移现象的思考162对严复译作中“信”的质疑167法律英语⽤词特征分析168法律语⾔翻译与法律⽂体177副词ever的句法环境和语义特征180功能语法视⾓下的英语报纸新闻标题的功能183⼴告⼝号语的语⾔特点189国际商务⽂化之对⽐研究204汉语中双关语的翻译213基于概念隐喻的诗歌解读228论⼴告英语中的幽默265论⼴告英语的语⾔特点268论汉英谚语的语⾔特征280论清教理念与美国西进运动282论莎⼠⽐亚⼗四⾏诗中的时间300论英语⼴告中⼏种常⽤修辞格及其汉译310论尤⾦?奥尼尔的表现主义⼿法324名词化的语篇功能330诺曼时期法语对英语词汇的影响339浅谈英语虚拟语⽓的语⽤功能340浅谈英语虚拟语⽓及其语⽤功能345浅析⼆⼗世纪计算机英语词汇的构成特点346浅析汉英动物谚语中的⽂化348浅析英汉语⾔中的性别歧视现象及其根源349浅析英语禁忌语及其发展352浅析英语⽆标志被动句356浅议译者能⼒359认知语⾔学⾓度下“within” 的空间隐喻意义365商标英语汉译的原则和⽅法384体育新闻英语⽂体研究375社会语⾔学视野中的⽹络语⾔418新闻英语中的语法特点研究423颜⾊词在英汉互译中的不对应性425移就的审美价值和⽣成基础426以认知为基础的颜⾊隐喻研究428隐喻认知功能研究的新视⾓429隐喻与⼀词多义的关系438英汉被动句对⽐研究439英汉宾语类型差异的认知原因。

sociolinguistics

sociolinguistics

3.2 The Study Scopes of Sociolinguistics
社会语言学的研究范围:一般而言,包括以下几个方面: 1)一个国家或地区的语言状况如双言制(diglossia) 、双语、多语或多方言状况; 2)各种语言变体包括地域方言和社会方言(social dialect或sociolect)、标准语和土语(vernacular) 、正式语体(formal style)和非正式语体(informal style)等构造特点及其社会功能; 3)交谈情景与选择语码之间的关系以及语码选择与人 际关系的相互作用; 4)社会以及不同的集团对各种语言或语言变体的评价 和态度以及由此产生的社会效应; 5)由于社会的、文化的、经济的、政治的种种原因以 及语言接触所引起的语言变化的方式和规律,等等。
empirical investigation.
It is related to methodology and contents of social sciences.
2. DEVELOPMENT AND MAIN REPRESENTATIVES
ORIGINS: Saussure’s & Chomsky’s concepts PROMINENT FIGURES: William Labov & Peter Trudgill
(3). It also studies the influence of the essence and differentiations of society on language (e.g. How to distinguish a person‟s status in his social class by groups, religion, gender, educational level, age, ethnic origin, etc. which he belongs to.) On the whole, sociolinguistics, drawing upon the theories and methods of different aspects of social sciences( such as sociology, anthropology, ethnography, psychology, geography, history, etc.), studies and researches language, and its social essence and differentiations, as well as its social factors.

sociolinguistics语言学定义

sociolinguistics语言学定义

sociolinguistics语言学定义Sociolinguistics is a subfield of linguistics that focuses on the study of language in its social context. It examines how language is used and how it varies across different social groups, communities, and cultures. Sociolinguistics explores the relationship between language and society, and how language reflects and shapes social identity, power dynamics, and social interactions.One of the key areas of study in sociolinguistics is language variation. Language variation refers to the fact that language is not uniform but varies in pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar across different regions, social classes, age groups, and ethnicities. Sociolinguists investigate how and why these variations occur and what they reveal about social factors such as social class, gender, ethnicity, and age.Another important aspect of sociolinguistics is language attitudes and ideologies. Language attitudes refer to people's opinions and evaluations of different languages or language varieties. Sociolinguists examine how language attitudes are shaped by social factors and how they influence language use and language policies. Language ideologies, on the other hand, refer to the beliefs and values associated with particular languages or language varieties. Sociolinguists analyze howlanguage ideologies influence language choices, language maintenance or shift, and language planning.Sociolinguistics also explores language and identity. Language is a fundamental aspect of individual and group identity, and sociolinguists investigate how language use and language choices contribute to the construction and negotiation of social identities. Language can be a marker of social class, ethnicity, gender, and other social categories, and sociolinguists examine how language is used to express and negotiate these identities.Power and language is another important area of study in sociolinguistics. Language is not only a means of communication but also a tool of power and social control. Sociolinguists investigate how language is used to assert dominance, maintain social hierarchies, and reproduce inequalities. They examine how language choices and language policies can reflect and perpetuate power imbalances and social inequalities.Sociolinguistics also examines language change and language contact. Language is constantly evolving, and sociolinguists study how and why languages change over time. They investigate the social factors thatdrive language change, such as contact with other languages, migration, and social mobility. Sociolinguists also analyze language contact situations, where different languages come into contact and influence each other, leading to the emergence of new linguistic varieties.In addition to these main areas of study, sociolinguistics also explores language and education, language planning and policy, language and globalization, and language and technology. Sociolinguists investigate how language is taught and learned in educational settings, how language policies are formulated and implemented, how language is affected by globalization processes, and how technology impacts language use and communication.Overall, sociolinguistics provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between language and society. It helps us understand how language is used, how it varies, and how it reflects and shapes social identities, power dynamics, and social interactions. By studying sociolinguistics, we can gain a deeper understanding of the role of language in our everyday lives and in the broader social context.。

社会语言学论文(基础)Understanding of Sociolinguistics

社会语言学论文(基础)Understanding of Sociolinguistics

Understanding of Sociolinguistics1 Introduction (1)2 Some definitions of sociolinguistics (1)3 The scope of sociolinguistic study (2)4 The comment on Fishman’s definition of sociolinguistics (2)5 Conclusion (3)References (3)Abstract:Sociolinguistics has drawn more and more attention since it became an independent discipline in 1960s.But scholars from various disciplines look at sociolinguistics from different perspectives,and carry out sociolinguistic study in different ways.This paper tries to understand sociolinguistics in terms of its definitions and the scope of sociolinguistic study to point out the lack of comprehensiveness in Fishman’s view on the definition of sociolinguistics.Key words:sociolinguistics;definitions;scope;lack of comprehensiveness1 IntroductionThough the social aspect of language attracted early attention,it was not until the mid 1960s that sociolinguistics became an independent discipline with its representatives William Labor and Dell Hymes.It has become an indispensable course in linguistic study together with syntax,phonetics and phonology, semantics. etc..But scholars from various disciplines have different answers to the questions:‘What is sociolinguistics?’,‘What does the sociolinguist do?’,‘What content should be included in sociolinguistic study?’,and ‘What methods should be adopted in carrying out sociolinguistic study?’.Fishman argued that sociolinguistics is the name commonly given to the study of who speaks (or writes) what language (or what language variety) to whom and when and to what end (cited from Wardhaugh,R.1986:16).Before we make any comment on this view,it is necessary to have a basic knowledge about the definitions of sociolinguistics and the scope of sociolinguistic study.2 Some definitions of sociolinguisticsSociolinguistics is a cross—disciplinary subject.Linguists and sociolinguists are not the only researchers involved in studies of language in society.Scholars such as anthropologists,psychologists,educators,and planners have an interest too.They study the socio—cultural aspect of language from different angles and come up with different understanding.Peter Trudgill says that sociolinguistics is a science that combines linguistic and social concerns in varying degrees (cited from Fasold,R.1990:FS0).This view seems to p1ay sociolinguistics at a high level by considering it “a science”, but is vague in the failure to specify the “varying degrees”.William Labov defines sociolinguistics as the secular linguistics.While William Downes sees sociolinguistics as that branch of linguistics which studies just those properties of language and languages which require reference to social,including contextua1 factors in their explanation.To quote Holmes’ view,sociolinguistics is concerned with the relationship between language and the context in which it is used.Gumperz states that sociolinguistics is an attempt to find relations between social structure and linguistic structure and to observe any changes that occur.This definition covers a broad range,therefore is more inclusive of the scope of sociolinguistic study.Susan Pinlips in 1980 defines sociolinguistics b riefly as the ‘study of the ways in which a person’s speech conveys social information’.This view manifests that language is a social behavior.People’sdifferent choices of linguistic forms may reflect their different social background.Wolfson expresses his view by saying that sociolinguistics is the study of the interplay of linguistic,social,and cultural factors in human communication.In Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching &Applied Linguistics, sociolinguistics is defined as the study of language in relation to social factors, that is, social class,educational level and type of education, Age, sex,ethnic origins,etc.(Richard,J.C.1992:425).It seems that there is no agreement on the exact definition of sociolinguistics,just like what Dell Hymes has claimed:“Different people may have different understanding of the term ‘sociolinguistics’.Therefore,no one has the patent for its definition.”(cited in Fasold.1990:F 12) But however different views scholars hold,they are ready to agree at least one point.That is,sociolinguistics studies the relation between language and society.Whatever sociolinguistics is,it must be oriented toward both data and theory.But still scholars will come up with different answers to the question ‘What content should be included in sociolinguistic study?’.3 The scope of sociolinguistic studyWe can generally divide sociolinguistic study into the broad sense and the narrow sense.The former is also widely called the macro-sociolinguistics,and the latter micro-sociolinguistics.To make the division clear, Wolfson compared sociolinguistic study to a sort of telescope through which language behavior may be studied in its socio-cultural context.In looking through the small end of the telescope,we view speech at the level of face-to-face interaction,and this type of study is called micro-sociolinguistics.By looking through the large end of the sociolinguistic telescope,we are able to see the workings of language contact,choice,use,maintenance,and change at the social level,a field of study called the sociology of language or macro-sociolinguistics.Hudson in 1980 made a distinction between sociolinguistics and the sociology of language in stating that the former is the study of language in relation to society while the later is the study of society in relation to language(cited in Wardhaugh,R.1986:12-13). That is to say.sociolinguistics can be studied either from the perspective of language or from that of society.Hudson further argues that the influence which society exerts on language is the major concern of sociolinguistic study.Some scholars also classify sociolinguistic study into the theoretical research model and the practical research mode1.But no matter how scholars define and understand sociolinguistics,it is generally agreed that sociolinguistic study mainly deals with social variation, language varieties,the differences of language use conventions,and the socio-cultural factors that contribute to the variation, varieties and differences.Social variation in language including the variation of region,social class, register, style,age and sex has been one of the major focuses of sociolinguistics since its formation in the early 1960.Language variety has been and still is the main concern of sociolinguistics,but the scope of sociolinguistic study may be very wide such that it can cover almost everything.Sociolinguistics is an empirical science.it must be founded on an adequate data base.This requires that when we are considering sociolinguistics,we should take the various kinds of research methods Into account.It is better to collect data through observing naturally occurring linguistic events.The ethnomethodology makes one significant contribution to the development of sociolinguistic study.4 The comment on Fishman’s definition of so ciolinguisticsFishman says that sociolinguistics is the name commonly given to the study of who speaks(or writes)what language (or what language variety)to whom and when and to what end.The American sociolinguist Nessa Wolfson shares the similar view with Fishman in generalizing the scope of sociolinguistics to be‘Who says what to whom,when and how’(cited from Hudson.1980:F14).Brief as Fishman’s definition is,it includes the major elements in sociolinguistics:“what” representsthe language or language variety.“who”, “whom”, “when”and “to what end”represent those social variables.This may be better understood by considering the four components that influence linguistic choices,namely,the participants,the setting or social context of the interaction.the topic and the function(Holmes,Janet.1997:12).Hymes’s SPEAKING theory may also be adopted to account for Fishman’s definition to some extent.In spite of its brevity and reasonableness,this definition is not comprehensive enough to inform us the nature of sociolinguistics,the relationship between it and the sociology of language or other disciplines.Neither does it cover the broad range of the scope of sociolinguistic study.It looks at sociolinguistics from the viewpoint of interpersonal interactions,and covers social variation and language variety, thus belongs to the scope of micro-sociolinguistics.To mention only the language variety does not make the whole story.It also fails to mention the research methods and the theoretical base of sociolinguistic study.Therefore,Fishman’s definition can not provide us with an overall and thorough understanding of sociolinguistics.5 ConclusionThough scholars from various disciplines have shown great interest in the socio—cultural aspect of language,different researchers define sociolinguistics differently and come up with different understanding.In fact,sociolinguistic study is characterized by a wide variety or inclusiveness of its research scope.Cf.McGregor argues that as long as we are fully aware of this point,questions like “How to define sociolinguist ics?” and “What content should be included in sociolinguistic study?” seem to be not very imperative and important(quoted in Fasold,R.1990:F12).References1, Downes, William,1998.Language and Society【M】.2nd edition.Cambridge:CUP.2, Fasold,R.1 990 The Sociolinguistics【M】.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers Ltd.3, Holmes.Janet.I 997.An Introduction to Sociolinguistics【M】.New York:Longman Ltd.4, Hudson,R.A.1 980.Sociolinguistics【M】.2-edition.Cambridge:CUP.5, Richards,C.J.and Platt,J.and Platt,H.1 992.Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching&Applied Linguistics【M】.New York:Longman Ltd.6, Salzmann,Zdenek.1993.Language.Culture.& Social An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology 【M】.Boulder:Westview Press,Inc.7, Trask,R.L.I999.Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics【M】.London;Routledge.8, Wardhaugh.R.1986.An Introduction to Sociolinguistics:Issues of Society and Schooling 【M】.Oxford:Basil Blackwel1.9, Wardhaugh.R.1998.An Introduction to Sociolinguistics【M】.3 edition.Oxford:Blackwel1.10, Wolfson,N.1989.Perspectives.Sociolinguistics and TESOL【M】.Cambridge:Newbury.。

大连民族大学英语小论文

大连民族大学英语小论文

The Introduction of Sociolinguistics汉语言文学112班张舒指导教师:伍琪凯梦Sociolinguistics is a marginal subject,which first rise in the America in 1960s. It mainly refers to a subject,which use the theories and methods of linguistics and sociology .In the meanwhile,the subject need us to study social nature and differences of language from different social science perspective.There are some different understanding of this definition.Some scholars argue that when studying the variation of language,we should regard language as the key point and consider the function of social factors.However,some scholars hold the view that sociolinguistics is a sociology of language,thus we should study various relations between the language and the society,and make use of the materials of linguistics to describe and explain the social behavior.In the current China,there are lots of confused aspects,among social linguistics ,cultural linguistics, cultural culturology.It is better for us to separate them.We are supposed to give a comparatively fixed connotation and a stable extension to the sociolinguistics,rather than think it as a notion that is limitless and fuzzy.In the current China,most of the people who are engaged in sociolinguistics ,are the scholars who are studying dialectology or the scholars transferred from the persons in the field of dialect. With regard to this phenomenon,there are a certain reasons.The dialect is bound up with culture and folk custom.It is also a reason that contributes to formation of Chinese social linguistics.Saussure is the first man who came up with research direction of the sociolinguistics.He thought that Language is divided into two aspects.One is Langue,that is the language system that is usually studied by people,or the summarization of the language usage,such as grammar, syntax, morphology etc.The other is the parole, that is social linguistics.The parole mainly study contemporary preferences of language, associated with research direction of contemporary society . Unfortunately ,the opinion did not get enough attention of scholars.W. Bright argues that sociolinguistics is a study of language variation.The content of the study involves seven aspects: the social identity of a speaker,the status of the listeners,the conversation scene, diachronic and synchronic research of social dialects,civilian linguistics ,language variation and application of social linguistics.His perspective is related to context,synchrony and diachrony of language.He attached importance to the language variation .Sociolinguistics itself is based on variations.J. Fishman divided the scope of social linguistics into two aspects.One is micro sociolinguistics, which is on the existence of language.The macro sociolinguistics is aimed to study social dialects and variations in language and investigate what effects the social factors may have on the language structure.The other is the macro sociolinguistics,which society as a starting point to study language function in in the community organizations.What J. Fishman values is the study object of different levels.D.Hymes presented that sociolinguistics has three important research aims.Firstly,it has both social objectives and linguistic objectives.Secondly, realistic linguistics,referring to the work which is Labov and his colleagues are engaged in.Thirdly,one of the research aims is linguistics about social constitution.It aims to explore theory of language which is broadly used.D.Hymes particularly stressed that the goals of social linguistics should be more extensive.Sociolinguistics should be an interdisciplinary subject.You Rujie and Zou Jiayan claimed that the name of Sociolinguistics was integrated sociology and linguistics.The content includes two aspects,the first one is Social Linguistics whose basic meaning is that starting from the social attribute of language,we use the method of the sociology to study language and explain the language varieties and language evolution from social angle.The second one is Sociology of Language whose basic meaning is that we can explain the relevant social phenomena and the process the evolution and development of language through the fact of language varieties and language evolution.In brief,the former is to study language from social angle,the later is to study society from language-based perspective.Sociolinguistics is an umbrella term which covers a variety of different interests in language and society,including the social functions of language and the social characteristics of its users.社会语言学的介绍汉语言文学112班张舒指导教师:伍琪凯梦社会语言学(sociolinguistics )是在20 世纪60 年代在美国首先兴起的一门边缘性学科。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

社会语言学论文A Brief Analysis of Gender Differences in Language******学号:************院系:外国语学院班级:英语1101指导教师:***二〇一四年五月二十三日A Brief Analysis of Gender Differences in LanguageAbstractSociolinguistics is the descriptive study that concentrates on the study of how language is used, and the effects of language use on society. It also studies how language varieties differ between groups separated by certain social variables, for instance, ethnicity, religion, status, gender, level of education, etc. With regard to this paper, the emphasis will be put onto the differences in the actual speech of different gender. We can classify the gender differences in language into two categories. The first category is mainly about sexism in language, as for this category, we mainly focus on how speakers demonstrate their different cultural attitudes toward different genders. The second category is about the differences in the actual speech of men and women.In the first part, I will make a brief introduction about sociolinguistics and gender differences in language. In the second part, it will concern the categories of gender differences in language and previous study of gender differences in language. The third part concentrates on the approach of the analysis. The fourth is about the data collection and research methodology. The fifth part analyzes the differences of the speech between men and women from three perspectives— the purpose of the speech, the topic of the conversation and the mode of the speech. The final part comes to the conclusion about the gender differences in language.Key words: Gender differences, sociolinguistics, analysisMain Body1、IntroductionThe knowledge of gender differences in language is very helpful for language learners, and gender differences may exist not only one but all languages. Men and women, on average, tend to use slightly different language styles. These differences tend to be quantitative rather than qualitative. That is, to say that women make more minimal responses than men is akin to saying that men are taller than women. The initial identification of a women's register was by Robin Lakoff in 1975, who argued that the style of language served to maintain women's role in society. A later refinement of this argument was that gender differences in language reflected a power difference. However, both these perspective have the language style of men as normative, implying that women's style is inferior. More recently, Deborah Tannen has compared gender differences in language as more similar to 'cultural' differences. Comparing conversational goals, she argued that men have a report style, aiming to communicate factual information, whereas women have a rapport style, more concerned with building and maintaining relationships. Such differences are pervasive across mediums, including face-to-face conversation, written essays of primary school children, email, and even toilet graffiti. Communication styles are always a product of context, and as such, gender differences tend to be most pronounced in single-gender groups. One explanation for this, is that people accommodate their language towards the style of the person they are interacting with. Thus, in a mixed-gender group, gender differences tend to be less pronounced. A similarly important observation is that this accommodation is usually towards the language style, not the gender of the person. That is, a polite and empathic male will tend to be accommodated to on the basis of their being polite and empathic, rather than their being male.All in all, gender differences can be reflected in many aspects in our daily life, we should pay more attention to it, thus we can avoid many misunderstandings between men and women.2. Literature ReviewCategories of Gender Differences in LanguageAccording to Wolfson, the research about language and sex can be divided into two categories. The first category is about sexism in language and the ways in which speakers demonstrate their different cultural attitudes toward men and women. Two areas of sexism in English have been well-studied. One is that females are excluded from mention in English because the generic he/man problem. Men are regarded as the representatives of all human beings and their speech is the standard, while women are seen as inferior and secondary in society. The second is that females are give negative treatment in society. Bad words in our daily is always related to female words. Female words are often used to insult a male, whereas male words are usually used to compliment female.The second category is about the differences in the actual speech of men and women. The formation of these differences in language may have historical, physiological, social and psychological factors. Lakoff (1973) was one of the early articles to deal with the issue of differences in men’s and women’s speech. She has concluded six major characteristics of women’s speech: lexical choice, question intonation in statements, hedges which includes tag questions and statement modifiers which remove assertive force, emphatic modifiers and intonational emphasis, hypercorrect grammar and pronunciation and superpolite forms.3. Theoretical FrameworkThe contrast analysis of male and female language in daily conversation concerns many aspects, such as the topic of the conversation, the mode of the conversation and so on. The differences of the speech between men and women may result from their conception of value, their hobby and their interest etc. They hold different opinions according to the same matter. So we can refer to the ethnography of speaking in describing the gender differences in language. Ethnography refers to theinvestigation of cultures using a particular methodology, that of participant observation. The ethnography of speaking proposed by Dell Hymes in 1962.…The ethnography of speaking is concerned with the situations and uses, the patterns and functions, of speaking as an activity in its own right. (Hymes 1962:101) This ethnographic framework takes into account the various factors that are involved in speaking. An ethnography of a communicative event is a description of all the factors that are relevant in understanding how that particular communicative event achieves its objectives. (Wardhaugh1998)Conversation means to exchange ideas through interaction, so we can also employ the approach of interactional sociolinguistics—rapport talk proposed by Deborah Tannen (1984,1982) to analyze the gender differences in language. Tannen (1990a) has described the characteristics of men and women’s speech from nine dimensions: intimacy-independence, connection-status, inclusive-exclusive, relationship-information, rapport-report, community-contest, problems-solutions, novice-expert and listening-lecturing. From the description, we can conclude that women’s speech tends to be solidarity, yet men’s speech tends to be independent.4. Research MethodologyThere is a binary distinction between qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative research is inductive, subjective, ungeneralisable, soft, process and verification oriented, hypothesis-driven, and hypothesis generating research, while quantitative research is deductive, objective, generalisable, hard, outcome and discovery oriented, data-driven and hypothesis testing research.In this paper, I employ the quantitative and descriptive methodology to discuss the differences of the speech between men and women. Firstly, the characteristics of women and men’s speech are collected. Secondly, the differences are described through the collection.5. Contrast Analysis of Speech of Men and Women in Daily ConversationThe speech of women differs from the speech of men in daily conversation. Men and women differ in the kinds of language they use because men and women often fill distinctly different roles in society. We can analyze the differences of the speech of men and women from many aspects, such as the purpose of the speech, the topics of the speech and the mode of the speech. Many of the differences may result from different socialization practices.5.1 The purpose of the conversationThe purpose of the women’s speech is to establish the rapport relationship among the members in the community. They try their best to become a member of the community. They want to keep intimate relationship through interaction. So in their speech, the main purpose is to express their feelings and listen to others. The style of their speech appears more obedient and negative.However, the purpose of men’s speech is task-oriented, they have a more analytical approach, so they try to solve problems and troubles through interaction. They seldom express their intimate feelings to others. They also want show their independence in the communication. So it is absolutely different from the purpose of the women’s conversation.5.2 The topic of the conversationThe topic of women’s conversation is different from that of men’s. The topic of the women’s conversation mainly concerns social life, emotion, this can not be separated from their position, profession, social status, and personality. Women’s speech is regarded as trivial and gossip-laden because in the speech community of women, they mainly discuss clothing, love, family, trifles in daily life, experience, emotion, food and drink, life’s troubles. The purpose of the speech is to show the intimate relationship with the addressees, and through the speech they want to reinforce their membership in the community.On the contrast, men show great interest in topics concerning business, politics, legal matters, sports, geography, economy and military etc., these aspects can reflect their solid position in society.6. ConclusionIt can never be denied that gender differences do exist in all languages. Since women and women play different role in social life, they will definitely employ the different skills or methods in their communication or conversation.Women’s speech is different from men’s speech in lexical choice, syntax and pragmatics in daily life. Like O’Barr and Atkins said, “women’s language ” would be more appropriately termed “powerless language”. It demonstrated to us that means this kind of language is less convincing, less intelligent, less competent, and less trustworthy, because women are more concerned about the emotion, intimacy, food, dress, relationship in conversation, they are always ready to share their happiness and sadness with people close to them or even strangers. However, men’s language is regarded as power because the controlling status in society, and what they are interested in is business, military, politics, sport and geography, they communicate with others in order to exchange ideas with them.After learned the sociolinguistics as well as this brief analysis of the gender differences in language, I came to realize that, as a language learner, we should not only learn the basic knowledge about language, but also know the culture of the language. What’s more, I realize that the gender differences in language can never be neglected in language learning for the essential role it plays.Reference1.Nessa Wolfson. Perspectiv e: Sociolinguistics and TESOL, Heinle & Heinle Publishers2.赵蓉晖.《语言与性别:口语的社会语言学研究》.上海外语教育出版社3.陈琳. 《英语中女性特点及其发展趋势探究》.《语文学刊》. 2010年第10期4.杨永林. 《社会语言学研究》.上海外语教育出版社20045.胡文仲.《超越文化的屏障》.外语教学与研究出版社。

相关文档
最新文档