雅思评分标准_2010年雅思写作评分标准

合集下载

雅思写作四大评分标准

雅思写作四大评分标准

雅思写作评分标准一直都是没有具体的评分标准的,但是大部分同学却都非常关心雅思写作评分标准,雅思考试写作天道小编可以为大家讲解一些比较常见的雅思写作评分标准,仅供各位参考。

雅思写作通常有Task1和Task2两个部分,考官给以下四项分别评等级分:任务完成情况(Task1)、任务反应情况(Task2)、连贯与衔接、词汇和句式丰富性及语法准确性。

雅思写作评分标准一、在雅思考试任务完成方面,达到写作任务各项要求、能确切选择有用信息进行全面评述、呈现并强调主要特点或要点,但细节可能与要点无关、不恰当或不准确。

雅思写作评分标准二、雅思写作连贯及衔接方面,信息和分论点安排连贯,论证过程清楚,有效使用衔接手段,但句内或句间衔接有错误或显机械呆板,有时指代不清晰或不恰当。

雅思写作评分标准三、雅思词汇量方面,相对写作任务而言,所运用的词汇量充足,尝试运用非常见词汇但有时出现错误,拼写和构词出现一些错误,但不影响交流。

雅思写作评分标准四、句式多样性及语法准确性方面,混合使用简单和复合句,语法和标点出现一些错误但基本不影响交流。

上面就是天道小编为大家整理的关于北京雅思写作评分标准四大标准,相信大家通过以上介绍对于雅思写作评分标准有所了解,希望能够对各位同学有所帮助。

2010雅思考试评分标准

2010雅思考试评分标准

2010雅思考试评分标准总分计算法总分计算法按照IELTS评分标准,考生每科成绩从1~9共分为九个等级。

考生的总分取听、说、读、写四个部分得分之和的平均值,平均值也需按照四舍五入的原则统计,并最终确定考生的雅思总分。

听力、阅读、写作、总分都有半分的情况存在,最后得分均为取四项成绩的平均值,如果遇到四项平均值为x.25或者x.75时怎么计算?遇到这种情况还是按照四舍五入的原则计算,但需要尾数大于0.5分才计入上一级分数,尾数小于或者等于0.5则计入同一级分数。

例如四项平均分等于或大于5.25分,则计入5的同一级分数,取5.5分;如果平均分等于或大于5.75分,则计入5的上一级分数,取6分。

得分与原始分数换算表听力和阅读都分别有40道题目,每答对一题得一分。

最后的分数(原始分 Raw Score)被折算成1-9分的雅思段位。

以下的折算表可以作为一个参考。

IELTS听力评分标准(A类与G类)Number of correctListening answers IELTS band score39-409.0 37-388.5 35-368.0 33-347.5 30-327.0 27-29 6.5 23-26 6.0 20-22 5.5 16-19 5.0 13-15 4.5 10-12 4.0 6-9 3.5 4-5 3.0 3 2.5 2 2.0 1 1.0absent0.0IELTS阅读评分标准(A类)Number of correctIELTS band scoreReading answers39-409.037-388.535-368.033-347.530-327.027-29 6.523-26 6.020-22 5.516-19 5.013-15 4.510-12 4.06-9 3.54-5 3.03 2.52 2.01 1.0absent0.0IELTS阅读评分标准(G类)Number of correctIELTS band scoreReading answers409.0398.5388.036-377.534-357.032-33 6.530-31 6.026-29 5.523-25 5.019-22 4.515-18 4.012-14 3.58-11 3.05-7 2.52-4 2.01 1.0absent0.0写作评分细则雅思写作分为Task1和Task2,考官从四项:任务完成情况(Task1、任务反应情况(Task2、连贯与衔接、词汇和句式丰富性及语法准确性分别进行评分。

雅思写作评分标准

雅思写作评分标准

雅思写作评分标准雅思写作的评分标准是句式多样性和准确性,考生在雅思写作中,比较喜欢用长难句、简单句相互搭配的方式进行写作,这个时候,如果一味地使用和长难句来描述,会让考官在阅读的过程中感到不适。

一.雅思写作的评分标准1.是否明确出题意向:如果考生对考察的中心主题了解有偏差,那么在后续的写作过程中,就会偏离中心思想。

2.连贯性和作文结构层次:这个方面考察考生本身的逻辑性,和叙述事情、表达观点的方法。

3.词汇储备量:考察考生是否能准确用词。

4.句式多样性和准确性:考生在雅思写作中,比较喜欢用长难句、简单句相互搭配的方式进行写作,这个时候,如果一味地使用和长难句来描述,不但不能升华整篇文章,反而让考官在读的过程中感到不适。

二.雅思作文怎么分配时间第一步:审题。

时间不要超过2分钟,这一步中考生要找出题目的要求,topic、time以及place等。

此外考生也要阅读图表的标题,横纵轴的文字信息,尤其注意纵轴单位,图标内的对象所包含的文字信息。

第二步:观察数据然后找出主要特征和能证明这些特征的关键点。

时间不要超过3分钟。

这是非常重要的一步,如果数据分析的不正确,那么也是难以在有限时间里合理规划然后进行写作的。

第三步:撰写文章,时间为15分钟左右,考生可以根据作文的大纲来写,即改写题目引出topic对象分类表明写作思路,重申主要特征或支出某个未提及的特点。

第四步:检查这一步时间为1分钟,不要做大的改动,把笔误的地方改掉即可。

三.雅思写作要避开的误区1.避免空洞的单词和词组。

一些空洞的单词或词组根本不能为句子带来任何相关的或重要的信息,完全可以被删掉。

有些空洞和繁琐的表达方式可以进行替换。

2.避免重复。

尽量避免重复使用同样的词汇。

或者有的时候虽然词汇没有重复,但意思却有重复。

这时候可以做一些简化的工作。

有时一个词组可以用一个更简单的单词来替换。

雅思写作四个评分标准

雅思写作四个评分标准

千里之行,始于足下。

雅思写作四个评分标准雅思写作的评分标准主要包括四个维度,分别是任务响应(Task Response),语言运用(Coherence and Cohesion),词汇(Lexical Resource)以及语法(Grammatical Range and Accuracy)。

1. 任务响应(20分):任务响应主要评估你对给定题目的理解程度,以及是否能够完整、精确地回答问题。

评分标准包括:- 完全理解并精确回答题目的要求- 充分进展全部论点,给出相关的理由和例证- 适当运用合理的论证结构和规律挨次2. 语言运用(25分):语言运用主要评估你对语言的把握程度,包括连贯性和连贯性等方面。

评分标准包括:- 连贯性和连贯性,确保整篇文章的规律和连接流畅- 引入段落和过渡词语的运用- 正确的使用各类句子结构和连接词- 正确使用语句和篇章层次的关系3. 词汇(25分):词汇主要评估你对单词和词组的使用力量,以及对同义词和表达多样性的运用。

评分标准包括:- 适当且精确地使用词汇,包括各种基础词汇、词组和习语 - 接受词汇多样性,避开过于重复使用- 正确使用词汇,并避开错误或不合适的同义词第1页/共2页锲而不舍,金石可镂。

4. 语法(20分):语法主要评估你的句法结构和语法运用正确性。

评分标准包括: - 使用多种句子结构,例如简洁句、复合句和简单句- 避开语法错误,包括主谓全都性、时态全都性等方面的错误- 正确使用标点符号和复合结构以上是雅思写作的四个评分标准,每项标准的得分范围为0-9分,最终会将四个维度的得分综合计算得出总体评分。

雅思官方评分标准

雅思官方评分标准

1
细雨飘摇ing,知识分享,文档创作
雅思官方评分标准是什么?
答:雅思官方评分标准如下:
考试成绩记录在成绩单上,包括一个总分,及听力、阅读、写作和口语四个单项分,
考生的考试成绩采用1-9分的评分制来测评,四个项目独立记分,最后所得成绩取四项
成绩的平均值。

总分和四个单项分均允许半分。

考试成绩记录在成绩单上,包括一个总分,及听力、阅读、写作和口语四个单项分,
成绩从1分至9分不等,每一项的分数权重相同。

总分即是四个部分所得分数经过平均
后四舍五入的成绩。

总分会以最接近的整分或半分报告。

为了避免疑惑,采用以下取整规定:如果平均
成绩的小数位是.25,就四舍五入到下个半分档;如果平均成绩的小数位是.75,就四舍
五入到下一整分档。

雅思写作评分标准对照表

雅思写作评分标准对照表

千里之行,始于足下。

雅思写作评分标准对比表在雅思写作中,有四个评分标准:任务响应、语言表达、组织结构以及词汇语法。

下面是每个评分标准的具体对比表。

任务响应 (Task Response)Band 9: 完全符合任务要求,作文内容精确无误,观点明确,没有冗余或无关的信息。

Band 8: 完全符合任务要求,几乎没有错误或不精确的信息,观点明确,内容充实。

Band 7: 符合任务要求,给出了清楚的观点,但可能有少量不精确或冗余的信息。

Band 6: 符合任务要求,观点不够清楚或表达不够精确,可能存在一些冗余或无关的信息。

Band 5: 有肯定的内容,但可能未能充分回答任务要求,观点不够清楚或不精确。

Band 4: 有肯定的内容,但未能充分回答任务要求,观点不够明确或不精确。

Band 3: 没有明确回答任务要求,内容不连贯,缺乏观点。

Band 2: 几乎没有内容,未能回答任务要求。

Band 1: 没有内容,未回答任务要求。

语言表达 (Coherence and Cohesion)Band 9: 内容和思路清楚,使用恰当的连接词和句子结构,段落结构紧密,流畅度高。

Band 8: 内容和思路清楚,使用恰当的连接词和句子结构,段落结构紧密,流畅度较高。

第1页/共3页锲而不舍,金石可镂。

Band 7: 内容和思路清楚,使用肯定的连接词和句子结构,段落结构紧密,流畅度较高。

Band 6: 内容和思路清楚,使用一些连接词和句子结构,段落结构全都,流畅度一般。

Band 5: 内容和思路一般,使用一些连接词和句子结构,段落结构不全都,流畅度一般。

Band 4: 内容和思路不够清楚,连接词和句子结构错误或缺乏,段落结构混乱,流畅度较低。

Band 3: 内容和思路混乱,连接词和句子结构错误或缺乏,段落结构混乱,流畅度低。

Band 2: 没有连贯的思路和结构,段落结构混乱,流畅度很低。

Band 1: 没有结构,无法理解。

组织结构 (Task Achievement)Band 9: 规律清楚,有明确的引言、主体和结论,段落结构全都,有恰当的过渡。

雅思写作是怎么评分的?总结雅思写作评分标准

雅思写作是怎么评分的?总结雅思写作评分标准雅思写作评分是考生朋友比较关心的一个点,知道评分标准也能让我再复习过程中更为有所重点,下面就来看看为大家收集整理的雅思写作评分细则,分享给大家,希望对大家有所帮助。

雅思写作是怎么评分的?总结雅思写作评分标准雅思写作通常有Task1和Task2两个部分,考官给以下四项分别评等级分:任务完成情况(Task1)、任务反应情况(Task2)、连贯与衔接、词汇和句式丰富性及语法准确性。

以Task1为例,一名在IELTS学术类考试中写作获得6分的考生,达到这一等级对应的写作水准是:(A)在任务完成方面,达到写作任务各项要求、能确切选择有用信息进行全面评述、呈现并强调主要特点或要点,但细节可能与要点无关、不恰当或不准确。

(B)连贯及衔接方面,信息和分论点安排连贯,论证过程清楚,有效使用衔接手段,但句内或句间衔接有错误或显机械呆板,有时指代不清晰或不恰当。

(C)词汇量方面,相对写作任务而言,所运用的词汇量充足,尝试运用非常见词汇但有时出现错误,拼写和构词出现一些错误,但不影响交流。

(D)句式多样性及语法准确性方面,混合使用简单和复合句,语法和标点出现一些错误但基本不影响交流。

雅思写作:控制小孩的犯罪天性有些人认为犯罪是人的天性,而有些人认为我们可以在小孩小的时候停止他们的这种倾向,你有什么看法?Crimes undermine human society. Reasons for committing a crime are varied and complex, so we could not say that violation of law is just human nature and that people’s tendency to break the law could be stopped when they are young.We are still not sure what causes people to commit a crime.The reason seems to be clear in cases in which a thief steals money to make a living or buy things normally unaffordable. Many thieves, when caught and interviewed, reveal that they come from poor families and have very little education. Therefore we could establish a relation between less privileged family background and low level of education. Many people used to believe that parents could teach their children the harms of wrongdoing by showing them the consequences of such action and the obligation of complying with social norms. Such method works for most children who are aware of what they are doing and what would happen from their action. But we also learn from news or other sources that many high-level officials take bribes or abuse power for their own benefit. Such people with high income and good education clearly know what they are doing and the possible consequences. Such crimes would not have happened if tendency to commit crimes could be stopped when people were young.Moreover, we know that people tend to act for their own benefit, but we do not know if this is due to human nature or other causes such as ideas learned later in life. If it is human nature, people live in faraway places without much education would commit crimes at a higher rate than people with schooling in cities. By contrast, people in remote places are more honest and kind, and the crime rate is significantly lower than that in city. From such evidence, we could not conclude that the above assertion is true.While we continue to explore what causes crime and how to prevent it, we need to bear in mind that it is far more complex than we normally think. Accordingly, measures for crime prevention should also be multidimensional.To sum up, the conclusion that it is human nature to commit crime and that people’s tendency to break the law could be stopped when they are young is not well supported. People become criminals for many reasons and we should adopt more effective methods for crime prevention.雅思写作参考:比较不同观点的优劣具体表述如下:TOPIC: Some people believe that A while others consider B more appropriate. Give advantages and disadvantages of the two positions and explain which position you support.MODEL (1)A andB are two totally different ideas that have caused heated debate over a long period of time. Anyway, I agree with the idea of A. However, it is unfair to say which is better than the other if we don’t see both sides of the story in the following paragraphs.Some people believe B because①. These people point out the fact that②. They also argue that ③.However, other people stand on a very different ground. They believe that④. They firmly point out that⑤. An example can give the details of this argument: ⑥. In addition, ⑦.In a word, A is too tempting not to be chosen. A, as shown above, has ⑧. ⑨.①人们支持B的第一个原因②进一步阐述支持B的第一个原因③支持B的第二个原因④支持A的第一个原因⑤进一步阐述支持A的第一个原因⑥举例说明支持A的第一个原因⑦支持A的第二个原因⑧选择A的第一个好处⑨选择A的第二个好处MODEL (2)Some people believe that①. Other people take the view that②. While both methods may have their advantages and disadvantages, they can be applied under different circumstances. Afterwards, I will explain my opinion about it.For A, ③But this also demonstrates that④Moreover, ⑤B, on the other hand, ⑥. For example, ⑦.In my opinion, the advantages of B are more than those of A because B fits me better in two ways; First⑧. Second, ⑨.①人们的第一种观点②人们的第二种观点③A的一个优势④A所隐含的劣势⑤A的一个大缺点⑥B的一个明显优势⑦举例说明B的优势⑧对我来讲,B的第一个优势⑨对我来讲,B的第二个优势雅思写作高分范文:我们为什么要上大学People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.People attend colleges or universities for a lot of different reasons. I believe that the three most common reasons are toprepare for a career, to have new experiences, and to increase their knowledge of themselves and the world around them.Career preparation is becoming more and more important to young people. For many, this is the primary reason to go to college, They know that the job market is competitive. At college, they can learn new skill for careers with a lot of opportunities. This means careers, such as information technology, that are expected to need a large workforce in the coming years.Also, students go to colleges and universities to have new experiences. This often means having the opportunity to meet people different from those in their hometowns. For most students, going to college is the first time they’ve been away from home by themselves. In additions, this is the first time they’ve had to m ake decisions on their own. Making these decisions increases their knowledge of themselves.Besides looking for self-knowledge, people also attend a university or college to expand their knowledge in subjects they find interesting. For many, this will be their last chance for a long time to learn about something that doesn’t relate to their career.I would recommend that people not be so focused on a career. They should go to college to have new experiences and learn about themselves and the world they live in.。

雅思写作评分标准对照表

雅思写作评分标准对照表雅思写作评分标准是考官用来评估考生写作能力的参考依据,同时也是考生备考时需要了解掌握的内容。

本文将介绍雅思写作评分标准对照表的相关内容,以供参考。

1. 任务完成度(Task Response)任务完成度指的是考生是否能够全面、准确地回答所提出的问题或就所给素材进行恰当的阐述。

具体的评分标准如下:Task response | 描述---|---9 | 完全满足任务要求,对所有问题都给出了详尽的、准确的答案或对素材进行了完整的阐述,有意义且具有连贯性。

8 | 基本满足任务要求,对问题或素材进行了详尽的回答或阐述,信息准确,只有轻微的遗漏或不准确的情况。

7 | 大多数堆问得到了回答或素材进行了较为完整的阐述,但可能有些细节或重要信息没有涉及或阐述不够准确。

6 | 回答或阐述基本准确,但只覆盖了部分问题或素材,没有完全阐述或未涉及的内容可能对整个文章的连贯性造成一定影响。

5 | 对问题或素材进行了一定涉及,但没有正面回答问题或进行有意义的阐述,也没有明显的错漏,但也缺乏亮点和深度。

4 | 文章没有明显偏离主题,但内容缺乏深度和亮点,回答或阐述不够准确或详尽,甚至可能出现信息错误或混乱。

3 | 文章与所要求的主题或素材明显不符,缺乏准确回答或充分阐述,错漏较多,表达混乱不连贯。

2 | 文章明显偏离主题或素材,对问题或素材缺乏回答或阐述,信息严重不准确或混乱,缺乏逻辑和语言表达能力。

1 | 文章与题目无法联系,对问题或素材没给出有效回答或阐述,表达几乎无法理解或存在严重语言错误。

2. 组织结构(Coherence and Cohesion)组织结构是指文章结构是否清晰,段落之间是否衔接自然、是否有充分的过渡。

具体评分标准如下:Coherence and Cohesion | 描述---|---9 | 文章结构清晰、合理,所有段落有充分发挥和合理布局,使用过渡自然,可让读者顺畅跟进。

8 | 文章结构合理,大部分段落有充分发挥和合理布局,过渡自然,只有个别段落可能存在过渡不够自然的情况。

雅思作文写作要求及评分标准

雅思作文写作要求及评分标准一、写作要求。

雅思作文分为大作文和小作文。

小作文呢,主要是图表类写作。

它会给你各种各样的图表,像柱状图、折线图、饼图,还有表格之类的。

你要做的就是把这个图表里的关键信息给描述出来。

可不能一股脑儿把所有数据都写上去哦,那可就太傻啦。

要挑那些重要的、能体现趋势或者对比的数据。

比如说,在柱状图里,如果有一根柱子特别高或者特别矮,那这个肯定是要重点说的呀。

而且呢,描述的时候要有条理,就像你给朋友讲故事一样,先讲这个,再讲那个,让别人能很轻松地跟上你的思路。

大作文就更像我们平时写议论文啦。

会给你一个话题,然后你要表达自己的观点。

你得有自己明确的立场,不能模棱两可。

比如说,话题是关于环保的,你不能说环保好像有点重要,又好像不太重要,这样可不行。

然后呢,要给出支持你观点的理由。

这理由可不能瞎编哦,得是能让人信服的。

你可以从自己的生活经验出发,也可以引用一些事实或者数据。

还有就是,文章的结构要清晰。

开头得把你的观点亮出来,就像给人一个惊喜的小礼物一样。

中间的段落呢,每个段落都要有一个中心思想,就像一个个小盒子,每个盒子里装着一种支持你观点的理由。

结尾的时候呢,再总结一下你的观点,就像把这些小盒子又整齐地打包起来。

二、评分标准。

1. 任务完成情况。

对于小作文来说,如果题目要求你描述图表的主要特征和比较重要的数据,你要是只写了一两个数据,或者把所有数据都乱抄一通,没有体现出趋势、对比这些关键的东西,那肯定分数就不高啦。

就像厨师做菜,人家让你做个鱼香肉丝,你只放了一点肉丝,其他啥都没有,那这道菜肯定不合格呀。

大作文也是,要是你没有回答题目里的问题,或者没有按照要求表达自己的观点,那这一块就会丢分。

比如说,题目问你同不同意某个观点,你却一直在说这个观点有什么好处,就是不说自己同不同意,这就有点像迷路的小羊,找不着方向啦。

2. 连贯与衔接。

这一点很重要哦。

你的作文要读起来通顺流畅,就像小溪里的水一样,潺潺流淌。

雅思写作四大评分标准

雅思写作四大评分标准要想提升雅思写作,取得更高的分数,就必需对于它的评分标准了如指掌,"对症下药'才能"药到病除'。

所以为了让考生预备雅思写作更有针对性,我为各位雅思索生带来雅思写作四大评分标准,希望可以关怀各位雅思索生轻松备考雅思。

雅思写作四大评分标准1、Task response即,对应题目要求。

简洁来说,就是不能偏题。

要回答题目要求你回答的内容。

小作文的要求一般会包含三点:1. Summarize the information. 总结信息,要用自己的语言对图表信息进行概述,而不是简洁地排列数据,说明数据,而是要解释数据背后代表着什么,说明了什么。

2. Reporting the main features. 说明主要数据,这考验考生们对于数据的选取,不是每一个数据都要写的,而是要针对主要特点、主要内容进行描述即可,次要信息不要乱加;3. Make comparisons. 作比较,比较相同点和不同点,不能只比较一点。

(这三个要求必需要全部做到,才能到达5分的要求;全部满足且能做到一般水平的描述,能到达6分的要求;在前两者的基础上能够做到适当的表达每部分的信息,能到达7分的要求。

) 而大作文,则是要求有明确观点,根据题目要求来写,所举的例子都要能论证观点的。

2、Coherence Cohesion连贯性和规律。

规律性就是要求因果之间有较为直接的联系,不要跳动性的思维。

这点是很多中国考生所忽视的,确定要是直接的缘由或者结果才能紧跟其后。

而连贯性的要求就要使用恰当适合的连词,使得文章的联系更为紧密。

常见的连接词有:表递进(and/furthermore/moreover/besides/Whats more);表转折(but/however/although/though/nevertheless/yet);表对比(by contrast/on the contrary/to the contrary/on the opposite);表类比(similar to/the same with/as/like);表举例(such as/for example/for instance/as an example of).3、Lexical resources词性、同义词的替换。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

雅思评分标准:2010年雅思写作评分标准2010最新详细的雅思写作评分标准。

雅思写作评分小作文、大作文分别评分,总分相加,得到两项的平均分,便是雅思写作的总分。

而雅思小作文及大作文的评分标准不同,但都是以文章完成度、结构联结、内容丰富程度,以及语法词汇的准确度四项分别评分,之后取均分得到每篇作文的成绩。

下面是详细的从9分到0分的评分标准。

IELTS Writing Band Descriptors: Task 1BandTask achievementCoherence and cohesionLexical resourceGrammatical range and accuracy9•fully satisfies all the requirements of the task•clearly presents a fully developed response•uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention•skilfully manages paragraphing•uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’•uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’8•covers all requirements of the task sufficiently•presents, highlights and illustrates key features/ bullet points clearly and appropriately•sequences information and ideas logically•manages all aspects of cohesion well•uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately•uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings •skilfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation• produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation• uses a wide range of structures• the majority of sentences are error-free• makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies7• covers the requirements of the task• (Academic) presents a clear overview of main trends, differences or stages• (General Training) presents a clear purpose, with the tone consistent and appropriate• clearly presents and highlights key features/bullet points but could be more fully extended• logically organises information and ideas; there is clear progression throughout • uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under-/over-use• uses a sufficient r ange of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision• uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation• may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation• uses a variety of complex structures• produces frequent error-free sentences• has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors6• addresses the requirements of the task• (Academic) presents an overview with information appropriatel y selected •(General Training) presents a purpose that is generally clear; there may be inconsistencies in tone•presents and adequately highlights key features/ bullet points but details may be irrelevant, inappropriate or inaccurate•arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression •uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical•may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately•uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task•attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy•makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication•uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms•makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication5•generally addresses the task; the format may be inappropriate in places •(Academic) recounts detail mechanically with no clear overview; there may be no data to support the description•(General Training) may present a purpose for the letter that is unclear at times; the tone may be variable and sometimes inappropriate•presents, but inadequately covers, key features/ bullet points; there may be a tendency to focus on details & presents information with some organisation but there may be a lack of overall progression• makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive devices• may be repetitive because of lack of referencing and substitution• uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task• may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader• uses only a limited range of structures• attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences• may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader4• attempts to address the task but does not cover all key features/bullet points; the format may be inappropriate• (General Training) fails to clearly explain the purpose of the letter; the tone may be inappropriate• may confuse key features/bullet points with detail; parts may be unclear, irrelevant, repetitive or inaccurate• presents information and ideas but the se are not arranged coherently and there is no clear progression in the response• uses some basic cohesive devices but these may be inaccurate or repetitive• uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetitively or which may be inappropriate for the task•has limited control of word formation and/or spelling; errors may cause strain for the reader•uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate clauses•some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation is often faulty3•fails to address the task, which may have been completely misunderstood •presents limited ideas which may be largely irrelevant/repetitive•does not organise ideas logically•may use a very limited range of cohesive devices, and those used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas•uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of word formation and/or spelling•errors may severely distort the message•attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and distort the meaning2•answer is barely related to the task•has very little control of organisational features•uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word formation and/or spelling•cannot use sentence forms except in memorised phrases1•answer is completely unrelated to the task•fails to communicate any message•can only use a few isolated words• cannot use sentence forms at all• does not attend• does not attempt the task in any way• writes a totally memorised responseIELTS Writing Band Descriptors: Task 2BandTask responseCoherence and cohesionLexical resourceGrammatical range and accuracy9• fully addresses all parts of the task• presents a fully developed position in answer to the question with relevant, fully extended and well supported ideas• uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention• skilfully manages paragraphing• uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’• uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’8• sufficien tly addresses all parts of the task• presents a well-developed response to the question with relevant, extended and supported ideas• sequences information and ideas logically• manages all aspects of cohesion well• uses paragraphing sufficiently and app ropriately• uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings • skilfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies inword choice and collocation•produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation•uses a wide range of structures•the majority of sentences are error-free•makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies7•addresses all parts of the task•presents a clear position throughout the response•presents, extends and supports main ideas, but there may be a tendency to over-generalise and/or supporting ideas may lack focus•logically organises information and ideas; there is clear progression throughout •uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under-/over-use•presents a clear central topic within each paragraph•uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision •uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation •may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation •uses a variety of complex structures•produces frequent error-free sentences•has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors6•addresses all parts of the task although some parts may be more fully covered than others•presents a relevant position although the conclusions may become unclear or repetitive•presents relevant main ideas but some may be inadequately developed/unclear •arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression •uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical•may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately•uses paragraphing, but not always logically•uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task•attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy•makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication•uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms•makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication5•addresses the task only partially雅思评分标准:2010年雅思写作评分标准2010最新详细的雅思写作评分标准。

相关文档
最新文档