(企业管理咨询)咨询公司面试案例分析指南咨询面试系列
灼识咨询面试题目(3篇)

第1篇一、个人背景及职业规划1. 请简单介绍一下您的个人背景,包括教育背景、工作经历等。
2. 您为何选择加入灼识咨询?请谈谈您对灼识咨询的了解。
3. 您的职业规划是什么?在灼识咨询,您希望在哪些方面取得成长?4. 您认为自己的优势和劣势分别是什么?在灼识咨询,您如何发挥自己的优势,克服劣势?5. 您如何看待团队合作?请举例说明您在团队合作中的经历和感悟。
二、行业及专业知识6. 请简要介绍您所熟悉的一个行业,包括行业特点、发展趋势等。
7. 在您所熟悉的行业中,有哪些代表性的企业?请谈谈这些企业的竞争优势。
8. 请结合实际案例,分析企业在行业竞争中的策略。
9. 您对行业政策、法规有哪些了解?请谈谈您对政策法规对行业和企业的影响。
10. 请谈谈您对当前经济形势的看法,以及您认为企业应该如何应对。
三、案例分析11. 阅读以下案例,请分析并提出您的解决方案。
案例:某企业面临市场份额下降、产品滞销等问题,请您从企业战略、营销、运营等方面进行分析,并提出解决方案。
12. 请谈谈您对以下案例的看法,并分析其中存在的问题。
案例:某企业为了提高销售额,采取了过度促销策略,导致产品质量下降,消费者满意度降低。
四、沟通与表达13. 请用简洁明了的语言,描述以下场景:场景一:您作为项目负责人,如何向团队传达一个重要任务?场景二:您如何向客户解释一个复杂的产品或服务?14. 请谈谈您在沟通中遇到的最大挑战是什么?您是如何克服的?15. 请举例说明您在团队协作中如何与他人进行有效沟通。
五、心理素质与应变能力16. 请谈谈您在面对压力和困难时的应对策略。
17. 请举例说明您在紧急情况下如何迅速做出决策。
18. 请谈谈您对以下情景的看法,并分析如何应对:情景一:团队成员之间产生矛盾,如何化解?情景二:客户对产品或服务提出质疑,如何应对?六、其他19. 您如何看待企业社会责任?20. 请谈谈您对以下问题的看法:问题一:您认为企业应该追求短期利益还是长期利益?问题二:您如何看待创新在企业发展中的作用?问题三:您认为企业应该如何平衡员工福利与成本控制?七、总结21. 请总结一下您在本次面试中的表现,以及您对灼识咨询的期望。
企业管理咨询案例分析

企业管理咨询案例分析案例1 联想集团的学习型组织问题:1、试分析联想的历次组织结构调整的原因和效果。
2、我国什么样的企业可以借鉴联想的学习型组织建设?学习型组织管理理论是当今最前沿的两大管理理论之一,是广泛适用于国家管理、城市管理、企业管理、学校管理、家庭管理等的宏观管理理论。
所谓学习型组织,是指通过培养弥漫于整个组织的学习氛围、充分发挥员工的创造思维能力而建立起来的一种有机的、高度柔性的、扁平的、符合人性的、能持续发展的组织。
学习型组织需具备6大要素:①、拥有终身学习的理论和机制;②、建有多元回馈和开放的学习系统;③、形成学习共享与互动的组织氛围;④、具有实现共同愿景的不断增长的学习力;⑤、工作学习化使成员活出生命意义;⑥、学习工作化使组织不断创新发展。
学习型组织需具备以下六大特点:①、精简;②、扁平化;③、有弹性;④、不断自我创造;⑤、善于学习;⑥、自主管理。
创建学习型组织应具备以下步骤:①、组织的画像;②、7C模型;③、6大行为准则;④、雕刻家的角度;⑤、测定标准。
案例2 A公司的目标管理问题:目前人力资源部的人数有限,而且各司其职。
面对以上存在的问题,该公司人力资源部应该怎样处理?问题分析:从这个案例中给出的信息来看,该公司的目标管理体系其实还是比较完善的,那么,为什么还会出现案例中的问题呢?一是目标管理没有同公司的发展战略结合起来,应有阶段性目标和中长期目标,使得目标管理缺乏层次感;二是沟通不及时,目标管理没有得到公司上下的认同;三是目标管理内容过于重复复杂,没有结合部门的特点制定,有单纯为搞目标管理之嫌;四是没有进行动态管理,及时调整目标管理内容和进行效果评估。
而问题的关键在于目标管理工作并没有精细化,公司缺乏目标管理体系的执行力。
部门经理不愿填写目标管理卡的问题,主要有三种原因导致这种情况:填卡太麻烦,重复性的问题浪费了时间。
针对这一问题,可以抽出每个岗位例行性的工作,这些工作在短时间内不会有很大的变化,将其记入岗位职责说明书中去,考核时同样有据可依;而对于各个岗位创造性的工作我们才记入目标管理卡;对于战略性的目标考核时间可以稍微拉长一些,如果有条件的话,公司可以定制一套目标管理信息系统,这样可以更加简便填写。
咨询公司面试案例分析指南咨询面试系列a完整版

咨询公司面试案例分析指南咨询面试系列a 集团标准化办公室:[VV986T-J682P28-JP266L8-68PNN]Firm: A.T. KearneyCase Number:Case setup (facts offered by interviewer):Your client is a manufacturer of bicyclesThey have been in business for 25 yearsThey manufacturer and sell three categories of bicycles:Racing bikes: High end, high performance bikes for sophisticated cyclists Mainstream bikes: Durable, but not overly complicated bikes for everyday ridersChildren’s bikes: Small er, simpler versions of their mainstream bikes for childrenProfits at your client have decreased over the past five yearsQuestion:What is driving the decline in overall profits?What recommendations might correct the situation?Suggested solutions:The first question is to determine what has caused overall profits to decrease. To accomplish this the candidate must first understand what has transpired in each of the three product categories over the past five years during which profitability has slipped. The following are questions and answers that would be provided in an interview scenario.What are the client’s margins for a bicycle in each of the threesegments?Racing: Cost = $600/unit, Profit=$300/unitMainstream: Cost = $250/unit, Profit = $75/unitChildren’s: Cost = $ 200/unit, Profit = $50/unitWhat has happened to the market size of each of the three segments over the past five years?Racing: Has remained constant at its present size of $300MMMainstream: Has increased at 2% growth rate per year to its present size of $1.0BChildren’s: Has increased at 3% growth rate per year to its present size of $400MMWhat has happened to our client’s market share in each of these segments?Racing: Market share has decreased from 60% to 30%Mainstream: Market share has increased from 0% to 5%Children’s: Market share has increased from 0% to 3%Who are the client’s major competitor’s in each market segment What has happened to their market share in each segment over the past five yearsRacing: There is one main competitor and a host of small firms. Your main competitor has increased market share from 30% to 50%Mainstream: There exist many, large competitors, none of which holds more than 10% of the marketChildren’s: As in the mainstream segment, there are m any competitors, none with more than 10% of the marketThe above information provides enough information to put together a picture of why profits have decreased over the past five years : Your client, with a commanding position in a flat market segment (ra cing), expanded into new segments (mainstream and children’s). As this occurred, market share decreased dramatically in the most lucrative segment (racing), creating an unfavorable mix.The extent to which profits have decreased can be deduced from some quick math : profits have slipped from $60MM five years ago (=60% x $300MM x 33% racing margin) to $44MM today ( = (30% x $300MM x 33% racing margin) + (5% x $1B x 23% mainstream margin) + (3% x $400MMx 20% children’s margin)).The dramatic decrease in market share in the racing segment is at this point still unexplained. Questions that would help formulate an explanation include:Have there been any major changes in product quality in your client’s racing product Or in its main competitor’s racing productNoHave there been any major price changes in your client’s racing product Or in its main competitor’s racing productNoHave there been any major changes in distribution outlets for your client’s racingproduct Or for its main competitor’s racing productYes. Previously your client and its main competitor in the racing segment soldexclusively through small, specialty dealers. This remains unchanged for the competition.Your client, however, began to sell its racing bikes through mass distributors anddiscount stores (the distribution outlets for mainstream and children’s bikes) as it entered the mainstream and children’s segment.How do the mass distributors and discount stores price the racing bikes relative to the specialty stores?Prices at these stores tend to be 15 to 20% less.What percent of your client’s racing sales occur in mass distributors and discountstores?Effectively none. This attempt to sell through these distributors has failedHow has the decision to sell through mass distribut or’s and discount stores affected the image of the client’s racing product?No studies have been done.How has the decision to sell through mass distributor’s and discount stores affected your client’s relationship with the specialty outlets?Again, no formal analysis has been performed.Although some analysis and/or survey should be performed to answer more conclusively thelast two questions, a possible story can be put together. There has been no appreciablechange in either quality or price (or any oth er tangible factor) of your client’s racing product relative to its competition. It is not the product that is the problem, but rather its image. As your client came out with lower end, mainstream and children’s products and began to push their racing segment through mass distributors and discount outlets, their reputation was compromised. Additionally, the presence of the racing products in the discount outlets has put your historic racing distributor (the specialty shops) in a precarious position. The specialty shops must now lower price to compete, thereby cutting their own profits. Instead, they are likely to push the competition’s product. Remember, your client has no direct salesforce at the retail outlets. The specialty shops essentially serve as your client’s sales force.The above analysis offers an explanation of what has affected the top side of the profitability problem. Still to be examined is the cost, or bottom side, of theprofitability issue. Questions to uncover cost issues would include:How does the client account for its costs?The client has a single manufacturing and assembly plant. They have separate lines in this facility to produce racing, mainstream and children’s products. They divide their costs into the following categories: labor, material and overhead. Overall costs have been increasing at a fairly hefty rate of 10% per year.What is the current breakdown of costs along these categories for each product segment?Racing: Labor = 30%, Material = 40%, Overhead = 30%Mainstream: Labor = 25%, Material = 40%, Overhead = 35%Children’s: Labor = 25%, Material = 40%, Overhead = 35%How has this mix of expenses changed over the past five years?In all segments, labor is an increasing percentage of the costs.Does the basic approach to manufacturing (i.e. the mix of labor and technology) reflect that of its competition?Your client tells you that there is a continuing movement to automate and utilizetechnology to improve efficiency throughout the industry, but it is his/her opinion that the ir approach, maintaining the “human touch”, is what differentiates them from the competition. (Unfortunately, he’s right!!)Is the workforce unionized?YesWhat is the average age of the workforce?52 and climbing. There is very little turnover in the workforce.What is the present throughput rating How has it changed over the past five yearsPresently the plant is producing at about 80% of capacity. This has been decreasing steadily over the last several years.What is the typical reason for equipment shutdown?Emergency repairDescribe the preventive maintenance program in effect at the client’s facility?Preventive maintenance is performed informally based on the knowledge of seniortechnicians.How often has equipment been replaced Is this consistent with the original equipment manufacturer’s recommendationsThe client feels that most OEM recommendations are very conservative. They have followeda philosophy of maximizing the life of their equipment and have generally doubled OEMrecommendations.The above information is sufficient to add some understanding to the cost side of the equation. Your client has an aging workforce and plant that is behind the times in terms of technology and innovation. This has contributed to excessive breakdowns, decreased throughput, increased labor rates (wages increase with seniority) and greater labor hours (overtime to fix broken machines).In proposing recommendations to improve the client’s situation, there is no single correct approach. There are a number of approaches that might be explored and recommended. The following are some possibilities:Abandon the mainstream and children’s segment to recover leadership in the racingsegmentIssues to consider in this approach:How much of the racing segment is “recoverable”What are the expected growth rates of each segment?How badly damaged is the relationship with the specialty outlets?Are there alternative outlets to the specialty shops such as internet sales?How will this move affect overall utilization of the operating facilities?Maintain the mainstream and children’s segment, but sell under a different nameIssues to consider in this approach:Is there demand among the mass and discount distributors for bicycles under their name?What additional advertising and promotions costs might be incurred?What are the expected growth rates of each segment?What is driving the buying habits of the mainstream and children’smarket?Reduce costs through automation and innovationIssues to be considered:What technological improvements are to be made?What are the required investmentsWhat are the expected returns on those investments?How will these investments affect throughput?To which lines are these investments appropriateAre the mainstream and children’s segments potentially “over-engineered”What impact will this have on the required workforce levels?If layoffs are required to achieve the benefits, what impact will this have on labor relations?Reduce costs through establishing a formal preventive maintenance programIssues to be considered:What organizational changes will be required?What analysis will be performed to determine the appropriate amount of PM?What training is required of the workforce?What technical or system changes are required?How will the unionized workforce respond?Key takeaways:This case can prove to be lengthy and very involved. It is not expected that a candidate would cover all of the above topics, but rather work through selected topics in a logical fashion. It is important that the candidate pursue a solution that considers both revenue and cost issues to impact profit. Additionally, a conadidate’s ability to work comfortably with the quantitative side of this case is important. The above recommendations for improving profitability are just a few among many. The candidate may come with their own ideas.。
咨询业面试必看 case interview 及其经典案例分析

(1) 什么是Case Interview?一般来说,Case Interview主要针对咨询公司面试而言。
也有一些公司如Dell二面会用一些小case来考察面试者的应变能力、考虑问题的全面性以及逻辑分析能力。
咨询公司的Case Interview可以分成两个部分,一开始先是Warm-up。
在这一部分,你可能需要自我介绍,然后大致回答一下面试官针对简历以及个人选择提出的一些问题。
接下来才是真正的Case Interview。
简而言之,Case Interview就是现场对一个商业问题进行分析的面试。
但是和大多数其他面试不同,这是一个互动的过程。
你的面试官会给你提出一个Business Issue,并且会让你给出分析和意见。
而你的任务是向面试官有逻辑的提出一些问题以使得你能够对这个Business Issue有更全面,更细致的了解,并且通过系统的分析最后给出建议。
一般而言,Case Interview是没有绝对正确的答案的。
面试官看重的不是答案,而是从面试过程当中你表现出来的分析能力和创造力。
对于大学毕业,没有工作经验的学生来说,大多数情况下Case不会很难,也不会需要你对那个行业有系统的了解。
Case Interview一般是一对一的,一轮会有两个Case Interview,由两个不同的面试官来负责,每个Interview持续45分钟,包括10-15分钟的warm-up以及一些Behavior questions,剩下的30分钟就是讨论Case。
10-15分钟的Warm-up一般用英文,Case可能是英文,也有可能是中文,不同的公司以及不同的面试官对语言是有不同的偏好的。
(2) 为什么使用Case Interview?由于咨询师在工作上的不少时间都是在和客户以及同事进行相互的沟通,同时咨询工作本身的特点要求咨询师必须具备一系列的特质才能够成功。
这些特质包括:在压力之下保持冷静,对问题能够很快的根据细节建立假设,并且运用很强的逻辑分析能力来解决问题等等。
【海归招聘会】咨询公司面试的Case Study,这样做准能过

【海归招聘会】咨询公司面试的Case Study,这样做准能过●●●想从100个candidate中,脱颖而出?那么,你必须知道如何搞定面试的案例分析环节(Case Study)。
咨询公司和投资银行的申请人背景大同小异,真正起到筛选作用的是面试中案例分析环节。
过去三年,我曾在三家咨询公司干过,目前我们正在招收管培生项目。
这里是一些关于面试的建议。
●●●勤能补拙,请多加练习!事实上,没人有这方面的天资。
这是一门需要后天练习的学问。
一旦进入到分析员的角色里,公司会提供资源对这部分员工进行培训,让他们适应公司的研究方法论。
所以,在面试阶段,候选人必须展示对案例分析的基本认识和日后的发展潜力。
面试官希望看到你能够通过逻辑缜密和高效的方法解决问题。
面试之前,你必须熟谙申请公司官网的客户及其信息,竞品的信息也必须同时关注。
所有成功的候选人在之前都有练习,正是不断的练习让他们在面试中胸有成竹。
其实,最好的练习就是参与面试。
在面试中,无论是面试官的明示或是暗示,你都可以得到反馈和指导。
如果你得到了这样的讯号,那么就坦然地接受并作出改变,或者你也可以说明你的方法为什么更好。
你对问题的反应能力也是面试官考核的一个方面。
●●●建模是开始面试之前,你必须学习掌握所有分析问题的模板。
举个简单的例子,你必须知道怎样将成本拆分成可变成本和不可变成本,或是把收入拆解成定价和数量。
然后再尝试通过更加具体的方式,比如市场营销的4P模式来解决问题。
面试官希望你知道一些方法论或是商业模式,因为咨询公司天天都在使用它们。
这些方法论或是模式让你的思考更加有结构,帮助你更快的得到几个“相互独立,完全穷尽”(MECE)的选择来解决问题。
然而,面试过程中,千万别做以下两件事。
一,千万别解释你的模板或是使用的原因。
模板只是为了建构你的答案,毕竟客户只关注如何解决问题而不是解决问题所采用的模板。
所以把面试官当成你的客户吧!二、跳出惯性思维的圈子。
运用已知的模板解决未知的问题,这正是一流咨询公司引以为傲之处。
咨询面试题目(3篇)

第1篇一、案例分析题题目1:某知名电商企业近年来销售额持续增长,但客户满意度有所下降。
请结合以下信息,分析问题并提出解决方案。
背景信息:1. 企业近年来加大了市场投入,广告宣传力度加大。
2. 企业产品线丰富,涵盖服装、家居、食品等多个领域。
3. 企业在物流配送、售后服务等方面表现良好。
4. 客户满意度调查结果显示,客户对产品价格、品质、售后服务等方面满意度较高,但对购物体验、页面设计等方面满意度较低。
问题:1. 分析客户满意度下降的原因。
2. 针对问题,提出提升客户满意度的解决方案。
解析:1. 客户满意度下降的原因可能包括:a. 购物体验不佳,页面设计不够人性化,导致用户操作不便。
b. 市场竞争激烈,同类产品众多,用户选择余地较大。
c. 广告宣传过于集中,可能导致用户产生审美疲劳。
2. 提升客户满意度的解决方案:a. 优化页面设计,提高用户体验,如简化操作流程、优化产品展示等。
b. 加强与用户的互动,关注用户需求,提供个性化推荐。
c. 持续优化产品,提高产品质量,满足用户需求。
d. 调整广告宣传策略,避免过度宣传,注重品牌形象塑造。
题目2:某企业计划推出一款新产品,但市场调研结果显示,消费者对该产品的认知度较低。
请结合以下信息,分析问题并提出解决方案。
背景信息:1. 新产品属于高端市场,目标消费群体为年轻一代。
2. 企业在同类产品市场占有率较高,品牌知名度较高。
3. 新产品具有独特的设计和功能,但消费者对其认知度较低。
问题:1. 分析新产品认知度低的原因。
2. 针对问题,提出提升新产品认知度的解决方案。
解析:1. 新产品认知度低的原因可能包括:a. 产品宣传力度不足,未能有效触达目标消费群体。
b. 新产品与现有产品差异不大,未能引起消费者关注。
c. 消费者对新产品功能了解不足,难以产生购买欲望。
2. 提升新产品认知度的解决方案:a. 加强产品宣传,利用线上线下渠道,提高产品曝光度。
b. 突出产品特色,与现有产品形成差异化,吸引消费者关注。
企业咨询-咨询公司面试案例分析指南咨询面试系列2:a1 精品

Firm: A.T. KearneyCase Number:Case setup (facts offered by interviewer):❑Your client is a manufacturer of bicycles❑They have been in business for 25 years❑They manufacturer and sell three categories of bicycles:➢Racing bikes: High end, high performance bikes for sophisticated cyclists➢Mainstream bikes: Durable, but not overly plicated bikes for everyday riders➢Children’s bikes: Smaller, simpler versions of their mainstream bikes for children❑Profits at your client have decreased over the past five yearsQuestion:❑What is driving the decline in overall profits?❑What remendations might correct the situation?Suggested solutions:The first question is to determine what has caused overall profits to decrease. To acplish this the candidate must first understand what has transpired in each of the three product categories over the past five years during which profitability has slipped. The following are questions and answers that would be provided in an interview scenario.❑What are the client’s margins for a bicycle in each of the three segments?Racing: Cost = $600/unit, Profit=$300/unitMainstream: Cost = $250/unit, Profit = $75/unitChildren’s: Cost = $ 200/unit, Profit = $50/unit❑What has happened to the market size of each of the three segments over the past five years?Racing: Has remained constant at its present size of $300MMMainstream: Has increased at 2% growth rate per year to its present size of $1.0BChildren’s: Has increased at 3% growth rate per year to its present size of $400MM❑What has h appened to our client’s market share in each of these segments?Racing: Market share has decreased from 60% to 30%Mainstream: Market share has increased from 0% to 5%Children’s: Market share has increased from 0% to 3%❑Who are the client’s major petitor’s in each market segment? What has happened to their market share in each segment over the past five years?Racing: There is one main petitor and a host of small firms. Your main petitor has increasedmarket share from 30% to 50%Mainstream: There exist many, large petitors, none of which holds more than 10% of the marketChildren’s: As in the mainstream segment, there are many petitors, none with more than 10% of the marketThe above information provides enough information to put together a picture of why profits have decreased over the past five years : Your client, with a manding position in a flat market segment (racing), expanded into new segments (mainstream and children’s). As this occurred, market share decreased dramatically in the most lucrative segment (racing), creating an unfavorable mix.The extent to which profits have decreased can be deduced from some quick math : profits have slipped from $60MM five years ago (=60% x $300MM x 33% racing margin) to $44MM today ( = (30% x $300MM x 33% racing margin) + (5% x $1B x 23% mainstream margin) + (3% x $400MM x 20% children’s margin)).The dramatic decrease in market share in the racing segment is at this point still unexplained. Questions that would help formulate an explanation include:❑Have the re been any major changes in product quality in your client’s racing product? Or in its main petitor’s racing product?No❑Have there been any major price changes in your client’s racing product? Or in its main petitor’s racing product?No❑Have there been any major changes in distribution outlets for your client’s racing product? Or for its main petitor’s racing product?Yes. Previously your client and its main petitor in the racing segment sold exclusively through small, specialty dealers. This remains unchanged for the petition. Your client, however, began to sell its racing bikes through mass distributors and discount stores (the distribution outlets for mainstream and children’s bikes) as it entered the mainstream and children’s segment.❑How do the mass distributors and discount stores price the racing bikes relative to the specialty stores?Prices at these stores tend to be 15 to 20% less.❑What percent of your client’s racing sales occur in mass distributors and discount stores?Effectively none. This attempt to sell through these distributors has failed❑How has the decision to sell through mass distributor’s and discount stores affected the image of the client’s racing product?No studies have been done.❑How has the decision to sell through mass di stributor’s and discount stores affected your client’s relationship with the specialty outlets?Again, no formal analysis has been performed.Although some analysis and/or survey should be performed to answer more conclusively the last two questions, a possible story can be put together. There has been no appreciable change in either quality or price (or any other tangible factor) of your client’s racing product relative to its petition. It is not the product that is the problem, but rather its image. As your client came out with lower end, mainstream and children’s products and began to push their racing segment through mass distributors and discount outlets, their reputation was promised. Additionally, the presence of the racing products in the discount outlets has put your historic racing distributor (the specialty shops) in a precarious position. The specialty shops must now lower price to pete, thereby cutting their own profits. Instead, they are likely to push the petition’s product. Remember, your cli ent has no direct salesforce at the retail outlets. The specialty shops essentially serve as your client’s sales force.The above analysis offers an explanation of what has affected the top side of the profitability problem. Still to be examined is the cost, or bottom side, of the profitability issue. Questions to uncover cost issues would include:❑How does the client account for its costs?The client has a single manufacturing and assembly plant. They have separate lines in this facility to produce racin g, mainstream and children’s products. They divide their costs into the following categories: labor, material and overhead. Overall costs have been increasing at a fairly hefty rate of 10% per year.❑What is the current breakdown of costs along these categories for each product segment?Racing: Labor = 30%, Material = 40%, Overhead = 30%Mainstream: Labor = 25%, Material = 40%, Overhead = 35%Children’s: Labor = 25%, Material = 40%, Overhead = 35%❑How has this mix of expenses changed over the past five years?In all segments, labor is an increasing percentage of the costs.❑Does the basic approach to manufacturing (i.e. the mix of labor and technology) reflect that of its petition?Your client tells you that there is a continuing movement to automate and utilize technology to improve efficiency throughout the industry, but it is his/her opinion that their approach,maintaining the “human touch”, is what differentiates them from the petition. (Unfortunately, he’s right!!)❑Is the workforce unionized?Yes❑What is the average age of the workforce?52 and climbing. There is very little turnover in the workforce.❑What is the present throughput rating? How has it changed over the past five years?Presently the plant is producing at about 80% of capacity. This has been decreasing steadily over the last several years.❑What is the typical reason for equipment shutdown?Emergency repair❑Describe the preventive maintenance program in effect at the client’s facility?Preventive maintenance is performed informally based on the knowledge of senior technicians.❑How often has equipment been replaced? Is this consistent with the original equipment manufacturer’s remendations?The client feels that most OEM remendations are very conservative. They have followed aphilosophy of maximizing the life of their equipment and have generally doubled OEMremendations.The above information is sufficient to add some understanding to the cost side of the equation. Your client has an aging workforce and plant that is behind the times in terms of technology and innovation. This has contributed to excessive breakdowns, decreased throughput, increased labor rates (wages increase with seniority) and greater labor hours (overtime to fix broken machines).In proposing remendations to improv e the client’s situation, there is no single correct approach. There are a number of approaches that might be explored and remended. The following are some possibilities:❑Abandon the mainstream and children’s segment to recover leadership in the racing se gment Issues to consider in this approach:➢How much of the racing segment is “recoverable”?➢What are the expected growth rates of each segment?➢How badly damaged is the relationship with the specialty outlets?➢Are there alternative outlets to the specialty shops such as internet sales?➢How will this move affect overall utilization of the operating facilities?❑Maintain the mainstream and children’s segment, but sell under a different name Issues to consider in this approach:➢Is there demand among the mass and discount distributors for bicycles under their name?➢What additional advertising and promotions costs might be incurred?➢What are the expected growth rates of each segment?➢What is driving the buying habits of the mainstream and children’s market?❑Reduce costs through automation and innovationIssues to be considered:➢What technological improvements are to be made?➢What are the required investments?➢What are the expected returns on those investments?➢How will these investments affect throughput?➢To which lines are these investments appropriate?➢Are the mainstream and children’s segments potentially “over-engineered”?➢What impact will this have on the required workforce levels?➢If layoffs are required to achieve the benefits, what impact will this have on labor relations?❑Reduce costs through establishing a formal preventive maintenance programIssues to be considered:➢What organizational changes will be required?➢What analysis will be performed to determine the appropriate amount of PM?➢What training is required of the workforce?➢What technical or system changes are required?➢How will the unionized workforce respond?Key takeaways:This case can prove to be lengthy and very involved. It is not expected that a candidate would cover all of the above topics, but rather work through selected topics in a logical fashion. It is important that the candidate pursue a solution that considers both revenue and cost issues to impact profit. Additionally, a conadidate’s ability to work fortably with the quantitative side of this case is important. The above remendations for improving profitability are just a few among many. The candidate may e with their own ideas.。
咨询公司的面试题目(3篇)

第1篇一、个人背景与职业规划1. 请简要介绍您的个人背景,包括教育背景、实习经历、项目经历等。
2. 您为什么选择咨询行业?在咨询行业,您最感兴趣的方向是什么?3. 您认为自己在哪些方面具备优势,可以胜任咨询工作?4. 您在职业规划方面有哪些目标?如何实现这些目标?二、案例分析1. 案例背景:某知名快消品公司近期销售额下滑,市场份额下降,请您分析原因并提出解决方案。
- 分析:市场环境、竞争对手、产品策略、渠道策略、营销策略等方面。
- 解决方案:针对问题提出具体措施,如产品创新、渠道拓展、营销活动等。
2. 案例背景:某互联网公司希望通过并购拓展业务,请您分析以下目标公司的优劣势,并给出并购建议。
- 分析:目标公司的业务模式、盈利能力、团队实力、技术优势、市场前景等。
- 建议:并购方案、整合策略、风险控制等。
3. 案例背景:某传统制造企业希望进行数字化转型,请您分析企业面临的挑战,并提出转型策略。
- 分析:企业现状、行业趋势、竞争对手、技术瓶颈、人才储备等。
- 策略:数字化转型路径、关键项目、实施步骤、风险控制等。
三、商业案例1. 案例背景:某电商平台希望通过增加用户粘性,提高用户活跃度,请您提出解决方案。
- 分析:用户需求、竞争对手、平台特点、运营策略等。
- 解决方案:产品创新、运营活动、营销策略等。
2. 案例背景:某房地产企业面临销售困境,请您分析原因并提出解决方案。
- 分析:市场环境、产品定位、销售策略、客户需求等。
- 解决方案:产品调整、价格策略、营销活动、渠道拓展等。
四、逻辑思维与解决问题1. 请用三个步骤解决以下问题:如何提高公司内部沟通效率?2. 请用三个步骤解决以下问题:如何提高员工满意度?3. 请用三个步骤解决以下问题:如何降低企业运营成本?五、团队协作与沟通1. 请描述一次您在团队项目中遇到的冲突,以及您是如何解决这个冲突的。
2. 请描述一次您在团队项目中遇到的困难,以及您是如何克服这个困难的。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Firm: A.T. KearneyCase Number:Case setup (facts offered by interviewer):❑Your client is a U.S. based manufacturer of branded cookies (cookies that carry the name of the manufacturer)❑Recently private label cookies (those carrying the name of the retailer) have emerged and threatened branded cookies➢Private label cookies emerged five years ago➢Two and one-half years ago they made up 10% of the overall cookie market (brand being the other 90%)➢Today they make up approximately 20% of the overall cookie market (i.e., there has been a steady, linear increase of private label portion of the overall cookie market during the past five years)➢The overall cookie market has been relatively flat over the past five years❑Private label cookies are made by the same manufacturers who make branded cookies, they are just sold under the name of the retailer❑There are essentially three major competitors to consider:➢Your client, who makes only branded cookies➢ A second major player, that makes both branded cookies and supplies cookies for private labelers➢ A collection of small outfits, that make both branded cookies and supply private labelers❑Distribution occurs primarily through one of two types of outlets:➢Grocery outlets: all grocers sell branded cookies, most also carry their own private label cookies. This represents approximately 90% of total cookie sales➢Mass merchandisers (ex. Walmart, Sam’s, etc.): sell only branded cookiesQuestion:❑How large would you estimate the overall U.S. cookie market to be in terms of $?❑How large of a threat do you believe the trend in private label cookie sales to be to your client?❑Based on your assessment, what is an appropriate strategy for your client to follow?Suggested solutions:The first question, estimating the size of the U.S. cookie market, has no right or wrong answer. It is a test of a candidate’s ability to make reasonable assumptions and work quickly with numbers on an “order of magnitude” level. One acceptable response would be to estimate the number of U.S. households, estimate household consumption over some period of time, estimate the average cost of a bag of cookies, and project out for one year. In this case, after an estimate has been made, the candidate would be told to assume the market size is $1Billion to simplify any future calculations. As stated in the upfront information, the market is assumed to have been flat for the past five years.The second question is more involved. It involves determining to what extent your client is threatened by the increasing percent of the overall cookie market represented by private label sales. To better answer this question information should be gathered pertaining to what is driving the demand for private label cookies, to what extent this has already affected your client’s sal es, and what the likelihood is for the trend to continue. The following are questions and answers that would be provided in an interview scenario.❑What are the sales trends for the client over the past five years?Your client’s sales have been flat at $600M for the time frame of five to two and one-half years ago. Over the past two and one-half years, sales have decreased steadily down to a present level of $560MM.❑How has market share of the private label segment been split over the past five years between your client’s main competitor and the other smaller players?The smaller players combined had 100% of the private label subsegment five years ago.Two and one-half years ago your client’s main competitor began supplying private labelers.Today, this main competitor owns 40% of the private label subsegment, the smaller players own the remaining 60%❑How has market share of the branded segment been split over the past five years?Your client held 60% of this segment five years ago, 67% two and one-half years ago and 70% today. Its main competitor held 30% five years ago, 25% two and one-half years ago and 23% today. The combined smaller players owned 10% five years ago, 8% two and one-half years ago and 7% today.Analsis of the above information tells a very important story. The private label segment was launched five years ago by the smaller players. As private label first cut into the branded segment, it came at the expense of your client’s main competitor and the smaller players, not your client. In re sponse to this, your client’s main competitor entered into the private label segment two and one-half years ago. This further hurt their own sales and those of the smaller players, but also began to hurt your client’s sales. Additional information is requi red to understand what is driving the demand for private label cookies❑How does the quality of a private label cookie compare to that of a branded cookie?Consumer studies have shown that there is a noticeable difference in taste, texture and quality in favor of the branded cookies❑At the manufacturing level, what is the difference in cost of production and price between branded and private label products?It costs approximately $1.50 to manufacture a bag of private label cookies which will sell for$2.00 to retailers. It costs approximately $2.00 to manufacture a bag of branded cookies which will sell for $2.75.❑How do the same numbers translate at the retail level?A retailer, paying $2.00 for private label cookies can sell that product for $2.50. The $2.75 bag ofbranded cookies can be sold for $3.50.The key finding is that from a cost-price-margin perspective it is advantageous for both the manufacturers and the retailers, with all else equal, to sell a bag of branded cookies. Other factors must be contributing to the demand for private label cookies. Think about the incentives at each level in the chain (manufacturer, retailer, consumer). The following questions can help fill in details❑Have any of the manufacturers been able to gain additional shelf space for branded products by supplying grocers with private label products?No❑Has their been excess capacity at your client, its main competitor or the smaller competitors that has been used up through the manufacturing of private label products?Th ere was some excess capacity at the smaller competitors and your client’s main competitor (your client is unsure as to how much).. There is little excess capacity anywhere in the industry today..❑Has your client’s relationship with its retailers suffered as a result of it not supplying private label products?Not noticeably❑Are grocery stores using private labels in other food categories?Yes, there has been a major push by grocery stores to populate shelves with private labels❑Is competition increasing or decreasing among grocers?Generally increasing. Grocer chains are expanding and the number of grocers to be found servinga given area has generally increased over the past five years❑What general macroeconomic trends have occurred over the past five years?The economy has been slowing over the past five years. There is concern about recessionThe above information begins to expose a clearer story. A number of factors have contributed to the emergence of the private label segment: manufacturer’s interest in utilizing excess capacity, grocer’s desire to sell products with their name on it (they may believe this creates return customers in an increasing competitive environment), consumers concerns about a troubled economy (price vs. quality tradeoffs).At this point the candidate would be encouraged to state what they believe the magniturde of the private label threat to be to the client. There is no right answer. One can argue either way.If the threat is seen as high, the likely recommendation is for your client to begin supplying private label products. The candidate should recognize that in competing in the private label segment, the basisof competition is primarily cost. At the same time, the client’s branded product should be protected. The following tactics might prove appropriate:❑Seek to wring costs out of all phases of the operation➢Utilize all existing excess capacity➢Gain maximum product knowledge as quickly as possible➢Understand low cost positions on product ingredients and mix➢Review process improvement/ manufacturing efficiency opportunities➢Undertake overhead reduction efforts(Any of these points could be discussed in great detail)❑Ensure there is no customer confusion between private label offering and branded product❑Seek partnering agreements with retailers➢Joint advertising and promotions❑Explore deals with mass merchandisers to enter private labels (remember, mass merchandisers presently sell no private label)If the threat is seen as low, the likely recommendation is for your client to stay with branded cookies only. The candidate should recognize that in competing in the branded segment the basis of competition is one of differentiation. Additionally, your client should do all it can to halt or reverse the momentum of the private label segment. The following tactics might prove useful:❑Pursue a maximum differentiation strategy➢Invest in brand image to support premium price➢Make it difficult to copy product: innovate wisely through product advances, smart product line extensions, frequent changes to the product➢Manage price gap: explore price increases where appropriate( Again, any of these points could be discussed in great detail)❑Explore exclusive partnering with mass merchandisers❑Consider alternative distribution channels❑Seek partnering agreements with grocers regarding branded products❑Educate grocers as available➢Customers who buy private labels are the most price sensitive. They also tend to be the least loyal customers and spend less per store visit.➢Grocers financial stake in private label products extends beyond the product margins. There is lost profit from branded products that could occupy the same shelf space, advertising costs of the private label products, etc.Key takeaways:This case has no right or wrong answ er. It forces the candidate to take a stand in a “grey” situation and defend it. It also provides a large amount of data upfront which the candidate must quickly sort through and determine what is important and what is not. The key is to understand the story behind the data. How did the private label segment emerge? What is driving it? How has it affected manufacturers, retailers and consumers?。