高级口译考试口试攻略

高级口译考试口试攻略高级口译分笔试成绩的有效期为两年，两年中共有四次口试机会，若在此阶段通过了口试，则能拿到高级口译的证书。

下面小编就和大家分享高级口译考试口试攻略，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

高级口译考试口试攻略先从口语开始说吧：口语的要求是语音语调、篇章结构、内容和流利度。

其实一般来说能一直讲较为又调理都能过，毕竟是考口译的证书。

如果大家做好了去考口试的准备的话，口语一般不需要怎么担心。

口试的评分呢从图中总结一下就是：总共四大段(两段英翻中、两端中翻英)中各分两小段，总共八段，中翻英英翻中各四段。

1) 8段里可以有2段成绩为不及格2)每段的1/3可以漏译、错译3)数字和重要细节不能漏错译注意：高口每段留给你翻译的时间很少，英译汉大约为45-50秒，汉译英有60-70秒，所以一定要结束立马开口+语速快。

考试的时候我第一段有一句话没有说完，于是第二段立马rap其实间隔时间短是高口最难的部分，毕竟每段1/3可以出错，但是时间短就要求反应非常迅速。

考试过程考点报到之后要把电子产品都放在一信封里订起来，然后老师会叫号，叫到的到口试的准备室里。

这个时候会发给你口语的题目，可以在准考证后面写，但是之后会粘起来。

等叫到你去考试的时候，前面一般还有一个人在里面考，这个时候可以继续准备一下口语。

一般老师会在你口语说了一两分钟后打断你，但是我当时老师并没有打断我，一直让我说了五分钟。

这之后就是口译，就是我前面一直说的，口译就是一定要快，不然真的说不完…………几个点大家注意带好一只水笔，在候考室想口语的时候没有笔提供，进去考试了才给你笔考试的时间可能会很早或者很迟我是最后一批进考场的，当时因为太迟还被调剂去了其他考场。

当时有点担心会控制考场的及格率，虽然觉得自己讲的不错但是有点慌，事实告诉我们，只要讲的好还是能过的!还有就是一定要记得迟早饭，我当初觉得早上吃不进东西然后没吃早饭。

最后等的快哭了带一些平时的口译资料在候考室是可以看自己带的资料的，我个人觉得在进去之前做一些视译练练嘴找找感觉还是挺好的03如何准备高级口译考试首先就来说说教材：我其实没有完全在准备高口，因为有参加比赛而且本来是想去考二口的，所以高口的书没有怎么刷，但是还是把我用过的推荐给大家1. 口试官方教材官方教材在准备笔试的时候就全套买来了，但是因为这本书很小很厚，没有办法完全压下去，导致我没有耐心看?。

但是有些时候高口会考里面的原文。

(我当时考试中好像有一篇，当然我没有刷过)所以还是建议大家看一下。

2. 真题我是大概考试前三天还是很认真的刷了一遍真题，可以很好了解难度大概怎么样，练练口。

大家有时间的话真题可以多刷几遍，自己计个时间看看来不来得及。

3. 新东方口试备考精要(紫皮书)这本书我在大一的时候有刷过一遍，但是这次考试前没有怎么刷过。

这本书是模仿高口考试，比较有代入感。

大家有空刷一遍高口部分也是极好的4. 二口实务因为本来其实是想去考二口的，但是由于一些原因没有报名。

但是之前一直都在刷二口的书。

在考高口前我差不多已经吧二口实务的教材和配套练习两本刷完了。

在这些练习中，很明显的看出笔记和口译都有很大的进步，所以材料其实没有特别的重要!多练才是硬道理!!!最后来一点我的tips：1. 建议大家练习的时候录音。

这点真的超重要，不听录音你永远不知道自己翻的有多么糟糕。

很多人在翻译的时候会有emma之类的停顿，录音之后会发现自己的不好习惯进行改正。

同时可以控制自己的时间，毕竟高口真的有点坑…语速需要很快。

2. 平时多去比赛+public speaking心态真的特别重要!假如特别紧张的话其实非常不利发挥。

比赛参加多了可以锻炼心态。

还可以见识到很多大神，更有动力。

以及认识很多志同道合的朋友。

都很棒!答疑这边我搜集了一些在微博私信/评论的问题和大家分享问：听的懂文章但是记不下来怎么办?听完文章之后不记得刚刚放了什么答：以我个人的经验来看过于注重笔记就很容易导致记不得文章内容，而且还看不懂自己的笔记。

假如文章比较难，听第一遍的时候没有听懂，那么第二遍就干脆不要做笔记直接听懂反而效果比较好。

假如笔记来不及记的话呢还是要多练习笔记法，建立自己的笔记体系。

也可以多用复述等等方法来提高自己的记忆力。

问：有什么办法可以听英文的时候又做笔记又理清逻辑的呢答：当然是要多练了!刚开始假如没有形成自己的笔记体系再加听力不好的话，当然会出现笔记记不下来又听不懂的情况了。

问：看了你的微博之后发现你从大一就开始看口译的书了，我大三了来得及吗? 答：假如下定决心做一件事，无论早还是迟，只要努力就一定会有结果。

假如你从大一开始三天打鱼两天晒网的话不太可能会能真的拿到证，如果下定决心了的话，从今天开始学起吧!问：距离口试考试还有两个月时间，现在开始准备来得及吗?答：其实来得及来不及自己心里肯定是有数的。

还是和前一个问题一样，假如你能做到一天7个小时完全浸泡式学习+原来就很好的基础，那么考试肯定没有问题。

但是我不知道每个人的基础到底怎么样，是不是每天坚持学习，所以不能下定论。

问：有没有口译的培训班?答：新东方应该有开设培训班，但是我是自学的口译，没有上过新东方的班。

不过我在之前暑假有去北京的一个培训机构培训过一个月时间，个人认为还是不错的。

杭州的培训班比较少而且和我学校很远，所以平时没有报，大家如果有条件的话报一个也是不错的，最好报名之前看一下师资。

高级口译阅读第一篇原文Great to see the article I’d written on the role of charities in healthpublished this morning. It reads well (he says modestly!). Here it is in caseyou missed it;Charities can offer better service than the NHSStop arguing over private or public delivery on health and choose what isbest for patientsSt John’s Hospital in Bath was established in 1180 to provide healing andhomes by the bubbling spa springs for the poor and infirm. The charity is stillthere 830 years later: a much valued health and care service for theelderly.This demonstrates our country’s great charitable tradition in health. TheGovernment’s desire to put citizens and patients first is both core to thecurrent health reforms and a guiding mission for the country’s great charitiesand social enterprises. The words of the Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, “nodecision about me, without me”, are our driving passion.We have a dual role: to deliver health services, undertake research andprovide care and compassion to those most in need; and to act as an advocate andadviser. We are sometimes a challenger of the health establishment and always adoughty champion for patients.For these reforms to be a success we must ensure a much stronger role forthe third sector. That is why we strongly support the policy of “any willingprovider”. The previous Government was profoundly mistaken in pursuing a policyof the NHS as “preferred provider”, which implied that services from our sectorwere less valued than the State’s. In fact, through a big expansion of the roleof charities and social enterprises in providing care, we can provide morecost-effective and citizen-focused services.This is not about privatisation. What matters is what is delivered, not whodelivers it. This must be at the heart of health service reform.Charities can offer a better deal in so many ways. In 2022 the NHS spentjust over 0.05 per cent of its healthcare budget through charities. In otherwords this is a virtually untapped resource waiting to be used.To me, competition in the NHS means British Red Cross volunteers being ableto help more people to adapt to life at home after a lengthy spell in hospital,so preventing the need for readmission. Those who get this support are oftenaged over 65 and have experienced a fall. Volunteers bring them home, settlethem in, advise neighbours or relatives of their return, check on pets, help toprepare a meal and make a further visit to ensure that they are safe and well.Such schemes can save the typical NHS commissioner up to ￡1 million a year.Competition in the NHS would also mean an environmental charity such asBTCV running more “green gyms”, which give people a physical workout whiletaking part in environmental projects. So far, more than 10,000 people ―oftenreferred by GPs ― have taken part. An evaluation found that the positive impacton mental and physical health, not to mention the acquisition of new skills,means that the State saves ￡153 for every ￡100 it invests. On top of that, ithas a positive impact on local communities and the environment. Do we want lessof this or more? I suspect that for most of us the answer is obvious. Those who rely most on the NHS are the vulnerable, the very peoplecharities were set up to help, precisely because they were being let down by thestatus quo. If groups such as the Red Cross and BTCV can do a better job thanthe NHS, we should let them.Promoting wellbeing and preventing ill health have for too long beenneglected aspects of the NHS’s role. These reforms rightly put emphasis onpublic health. Giving a role in health back to local councils is long overdue.The new health and wellbeing boards may provide the opportunity to get moreresources behind public health as well as, for the first time, giving electedcouncillors the chance to scrutinise NHS resources. Preventing diabetes throughbetter education, diet and exercise is always a better approach than picking upthe costs of a growing number of people with diabetes. Charities such asDiabetes UK, working with councils and GPs, are critical to achieving that.Of course there are challenges in introducing reforms. Of course properfunding is crucial. We want to ensure that there is a strategic approach tocommissioning, including national guidelines. We want the new GP consortia totake full advantage of the opportunity to expand their work with our sector.The challenge we face as a country is to build on the sure foundations ofour NHS to provide service that recognises and expands the work of charities,promotes partnerships between State, third and private sectors and moves on fromarcane arguments over privatisation.And The Times also had a brilliant summary of the problems of Big Societyand how to solve them by Phil Collins and a great letter from my Chair inresponse to the Francis Maude MP article.I’m blogging from H M Treasury where the Prime Minister has been announcingnew procurement and commissioning arrangements to free up the process for SMEsand charities and social enterprises. He was clear that we are part of the SMEcommunity and contracting has to be changed so that we can bid easier andbetter. He must have mentioned charities some 10 times in his speech and evenreferred to me directly. Then shook my hand on the way out! I made the point tohim that we welcome the initiatives and I referred to Chris White MP’s SocialClause Bill and how important that is.And now the weekend beckons. Though I’m spending Sunday morning on SkyNews. There you go; no rest for the wicked!高级口译阅读第三篇原文John Lewis: never knowingly undersold?It is possibly the most famous promise in British retailing: Neverknowingly undersold has been at the heart of John Lewis’s business since 1925.But a quietly introduced change has infuriated loyal customers, who claim theprice-match promise is now slipping away.For many years John Lewis customers have been safe in the knowledge that ifthey found their purchase for a lower price elsewhere the company would refundthe difference. Carrier bags and marketing campaigns have proudly proclaimed tothe world that John Lewis won’t be beaten on price.Yet since September some customers who have asked John Lewis to match theprice of goods found cheaper elsewhere on the high street have been turnedaway.A Guardian Money reader from Roydon, Essex, contacted us after he bought aHotpoint washing machine in John Lewis’s Welwyn store for ￡279. A few days laterhe saw the same model in Argos for ￡219 ? ￡60 cheaper. John Lewis turned downhis claim made under the never knowingly undersold policy, because it said itguaranteed the washing machines for two years, while Argos offered only oneyear.The customer complained ? unsuccessfully ? that the store wasn’t being fairas this was not made clear in the literature.When Money investigated, we found that John Lewis had made a fundamentalchange to its policy.In a statement in September, which at the time drew positive headlines, itsaid it would for the first time match online prices from other retailers aslong as they also had a physical high street presence. What was made less clearwas that the store would no longer match a price unless its rival offers theexact same warranty.The policy change might not sound much, but it in effect allows the storeto avoid almost all price matching of electrical items ? because John Lewis hasadopted a policy of offering two-year warranties on almost every such item. Moststores in the UK offer just one year.When we first raised the reader’s complaint with John Lewis it told us: Aspart of our commitment to be never knowingly undersold, we match prices based onthe combined cost of the product plus charges the competitor may make for acomparable warranty or guarantee. We evaluate price-match claims on alike-for-like basis, and breakdown cover is a crucial part of our proposition toour customers.What it failed to mention was that prior to the September policy rewrite,it would have paid the complainant the ￡60 difference between the John Lewis andArgos washing machines.Interestingly, the store confirmed it would not price match the cost ofbuying a product plus a warranty from a third party company, but would considera claim if the cheaper retailer offered the chance to buy both together. David Suddock, head of buying support at John Lewis, who revised thepolicy, says: As a result of our commitment to expand our never knowinglyundersold policy to include other retailers with online presences we now put agreat deal of resources into checking the prices charged by our rivals andlowering ours where appropriate. Our customers are benefiting throughsignificantly reduced prices. They tell us they value the extra warranty periodswe offer, and we think it is only fair we should include that in our price matchscheme. The terms of the never knowingly undersold policy are clearly presentedin both our stores and on the website.But if the Money postbag is to be believed, most John Lewis customers wereunaware of the change. And Martyn Hocking, editor of Which? says: John Lewis isknown for its great customer service, so the change to its never knowinglyundersold policy is very disappointing. Customers would naturally expect anyprice matching policy to relate to the up-front cost of a product, excluding thevalue of added extras such as warranties and guarantees. As such, we feel thatthe amended policy is misleading and will lead to frustration for manyshoppers.But Natalie Berg, research director at retail analysts Planet Retail, saysJohn Lewis’s move was perhaps inevitable: The internet has put the power tocompare prices in the hands of all of us; some shoppers now use smart phones tocheck prices as they walk around a store. John Lewis has realised that whileprice is important, it’s not the factor in where to buy. The fact that JohnLewis has been one of the winners on the high street in recent months suggestsconsumers are not just looking for the lowest prices, but they want value ? andthe perception is that John Lewis delivers this.高级口译考试口试攻略。