松下supplier survey report--new
Supplier Manual Rev12
Flex-N-Gate MechanicalAssembliesSupplier ManualRev.12(For Bradford and Seeburn Division)For use with ISO 9001:2000 or ISO/TS 16949:2002 2nd EditionRevision: 12Revision Date: September 26, 2008Flex-N-Gate - BradfordVentra Group Co.Flex-N-Gate - BradfordSeptember 2008Enclosed please find the current release of Flex-N-Gate's Mechanical Assemblies Supplier Manual.All Suppliers to Flex-N-Gate Bradford and Flex-N-Gate Seeburn are required to be third party registered to ISO 9001:2000 or ISO/TS 16949:2002 2nd Edition by an accredited third-party certification body. Please refer to the manual for specific instructions regarding registration compliance and timing.The revised manual also addresses specific requirements for Flex-N-Gate and as such, compliance to all is required.This release shall supersede all other releases, please destroy any copies you may have. Please contact the undersigned should you require additional clarification.Sincerely,Fred Gilbert Jeff Poynter Steve Dobsi Glenn Sernoski Director of Purchasing Q.A. Manager Q.A. Manager Q.A. Manager Bradford Division Beaverton -Seeburn Tottenham -SeeburnEnclosureAmendment RecordDate of Revision Revision # Section # Details of Change September 1, 1995 1 All Initial ReleaseDecember 17, 1997 2 All Mission Statement,Name/SignaturesFebruary 5, 1999 3AllQS9000 Third EditionRevised Supplier Rating SystemSupplier Award ProgramJune 1, 2000 4 Sec. 14 Updated QF# 11December 11, 2000 5 All Updated Approval ListMarch 06, 2002 6 All Updated Company NameUpdated fiscal year dates in Sect. 6Added Glenn Sernoski to acknowledgementletterAdd Corrective Action Response to Sect. 22 May 16, 2002 7 All Company name change from Ventra to Flex-N-GateOctober 30, 2003 8 All Modified to reflect TS16949 standard March 1, 2006 9 All Mod. to reflect Bug-Free pkg./palletlegislation, Bar code labelling, delivery ofcertified safety stock, IMDS support doc.,Tooling, Containment, NAFTA regulations,Ford Heat TreatAugust 2, 2007 10 5 - PPAPSupplierPerformance Removed incorrect statementsClarified Low/Medium/High supplier PPAP requirementsClarified Supplier Performance ratingsNovember 2, 2007 11 4 – Risk Level Added on site assessments for High risksuppliersNovember 2, 2007 11 5 – PPAP Added PPAP’s to comply with latest AIAGPPAP manual and all referenced AIAGmanuals).Clarified that FNG owned check fixtures tocomply with FNG gauge standards manualPPAP package format to be as requested byFNG plantNovember 2, 2007 11 13-NAFTA Clarified annual submission requirement forNAFTA documentsNovember 2, 2007 11 1-Standard TermsAdded reference to all other Standard terms and conditionsNovember 2, 2007 11 11 –Containment/Non-conforming MaterialRevised sort/rework hourly rate from $75 to $50November 2, 2007 11 8, 9, 10 Added CQI-9, CQI-11 and CQI-12 annualassessments requirementSeptember 26, 2008126 Added reference to Tooling Invoice payment.IndexQuality Management System 1. ISO 9001:2000 Registration 2. Pre-Award Survey 3. Request for Quotation 4. Risk Level5. PPAP Requirement6. Tooling7. Annual Layouts8. Suppliers of Heat Treated Material 9. Suppliers of Plated Material 10. Suppliers of Coated Material11. Containment / Non Conforming Material 12. IMDS13. NAFTA DocumentationMaterial Requirements 1. Material Releasing 2. EDI3. Bar Code Labelling4. Packaging5. Delivery6. Payment Terms7. Supplier CommunicationSupplier Performance 1. Review Frequency 2. Rating System3. Supplier Award Program4. Administrative ChargesStandard Terms1. Standard Terms and conditionsQuality Management System1. ISO 9001:2000 RegistrationAll Suppliers are required to be 3rd party registered to a minimum of ISO 9001:2000 and in compliance with TS16949 2nd Edition, with a goal of upgrading to ISO/TS 16949 2nd Edition 2002, by October 1, 2006.Those Suppliers who are currently registered to a prior standard must upgrade to either ISO 9001:2000 or ISO/TS 16949 2nd Edition 2002 at the expiration of their current certification or in accordance with customer specific requirements as directed by Ford, General Motors and Daimler Chrysler.2. Pre-Award SurveyA Pre-Award (FAP.010) survey shall be conducted with new Suppliers under considerationfor award of business.All potential Suppliers must successfully pass the initial Pre-Award survey. Subsequent surveys may be conducted at Flex-N-Gate’s discretion.3. Request for QuotationPrior to award of any business, the supplier will be expected to complete the Flex-N-Gate RFQ form (FAP.006)with complete detailed cost breakdown. Should a discrepancy between the supplier’s layout and our layout occur, then our layout is to be followed.4. Risk LevelFlex N Gate will assess the risk level of each supplier for each part that they supply. Each supplier will receive a High, Medium or Low risk rating for each part they supply. The risk level will be noted on the Supplier PPAP request form (FQA.010). High risk suppliers will be required to have an onsite assessment (FQA.183) conducted by Flex N Gate’s quality department after PPAP but before to SOP.5. PPAP RequirementsFlex-N-Gate will issue the Supplier PPAP Request (form FQA.010) identifying submission requirements. Supplier PPAP’s must conform to the latest AIAG PPAP manual (including the latest AIAG forms) and all referenced latest AIAG manuals (ie. MSA, FMEA etc.) It will be responsibility of the Supplier to insure that the PPAP reflects the latest revision level of the controlled drawing issued by Flex-N-Gate. This form should be included with the supplier PPAP submission and used as a checking tool to ensure a complete submission.This form will be used as a communication tool back to the supplier if the PPAP submission requires additional or corrected information.It is the responsibility of the Supplier to meet all Appearance criteria directed by Flex-N-Gate on components that are deemed appearance items. The Supplier is responsible for providing resources and managing it’s sub-suppliers to ensure that Appearance parts are provided to Flex-N-Gate for approval by Flex-N-Gate customers in a timely manner. This applies to AAR submissions for initial PPAP approval, and any further AAR submissions required by Flex-N-Gate and its customers.Suppliers must only PPAP to the Flex-N-Gate controlled drawing. Tier-2 suppliers are responsible for the PPAP submission and approval of subsequent tier suppliers. Parts submitted with the PPAP should be individually identified to match dimensional report. All gauges owned by Flex N Gate must be built in accordance to Flex-N-Gate Gauge Standards (see Appendix for standards). All submissions, except annual revalidations, must include IMDS number and NAFTA Certificates (as per section 12/13). All PPAP documents must be sent as an entire package (electronically or hardcopy) and packaged in a format requested by the applicable Flex N Gate plant.Additionally suppliers whose parts are assembled into a Ford product will be required to submit annual level 3 PPAP’s to Flex N Gate. Suppliers who fall into this category, will be notified annually by the applicable Plant Quality department.Failure to submit a requested deliverable will result in the supplier’s PPAP being rejected. Flex-N-Gate PPAP specific requirements:Low / Medium Risk Suppliers:6 pcs. (per cavity) full layout minimumCapability study minimum 100 pcs.High Risk Suppliers:12 pcs (per cavity) full layout minimumCapability study minimum 100 pcs.See appendix for a sample of the PPAP Request.6. ToolingWhen Tooling is Kicked-Off to supplier (usually through a spot-buy Purchase Order), Supplier is required to fill in and return the Bailment Receipt form (FAP.027) and Tooling Information Sheet (FAP.028) to the Advance Purchasing Dept. at FNG. (see Appendix for sample forms). Failure to provide completed Bailment or Tooling forms may delay payment of final tooling invoice.Disposal of any Flex-N-Gate / Seeburn Tools is not allowed, unless given specific written instructions.7. Annual LayoutsSupplier’s to provide Flex-N-Gate’s Quality Assurance department, an annual layout (Level 2 submission) for all Flex-N-Gate released components. Layout will be due by the last day of the month, on the one year anniversary of the original layout.8. Suppliers of Heat Treated MaterialSuppliers of heat-treated material will be required to perform a Heat Treat System Assessment per CQI-9 second edition (available from AIAG) annually and submit to Flex N Gate’s Quality department when requested.9. Suppliers of Plated MaterialSuppliers of plated material will be required to perform a Plating System Assessment per CQI-11 (available from AIAG) annually and submit to Flex N Gate’s Quality department when requested.10. Suppliers of Coated MaterialSuppliers of coated material will be required to perform a Coating System Assessment per CQI-12 (available from AIAG) annually and submit to Flex N Gate’s Quality department when requested.11. Containment / Non Conforming MaterialSuppliers providing Non Conforming Material will receive a Non Conforming Material Report (NCMR) form FQA.036. See appendix for a sample.Suppliers must initiate a containment process to insure Flex-N-Gate does not receive any further Non Conforming Material.Suppliers must submit an initial 8-D report, indicating their Containment Plan within 24 hours of receiving an NCMR. The Containment Plan must include material in transit. The Containment Plan will be reviewed and agreed to by Flex-N-Gate.Suppliers receiving an NCMR will be responsible for submitting 8D Corrective Action as follows:Major Issues- if non-conforming material received by FNG from the supplier causes a major disruption (downtime) to production lines, and/or issue at FNG’s Customer. The supplier shall be responsible for all resulting costs.Internal containment at your facility must take place for 30 days subsequent to the implementation & approval of permanent Corrective Action.The Supplier shall submit a completed 8-D within 10 days. Any deviation from this requirement must be agreed to by FNG Quality dept.Minor Issues- if non-conforming material received by FNG from the supplier causes zero or minor disruption (no down time / no scrap / no issue at FNG Customer). The supplier shall certify the next three shipments.The supplier shall submit a completed 8-D within 10 days. Any deviation from this requirement must be agreed to by FNG Quality dept.Disposition shall be provided for Non-conforming material in the following manner:a) Use as is: material used, quantities not counted against PPM totalb) Sort / Rework: supplier will be charged a standard sort / rework fee ($50.00/hr);defective pieces found will be counted against PPM total.c) Removal of non-conforming material will be the responsibility of the supplier.Non-conforming material remaining over 48 hours at Flex-N-Gate will be subjectto $100.00 per day warehousing feed) A minimum $250.00 administration fee will be charged for each NCMR to coveradministration costs.12. IMDSSuppliers must register with IMDS (International Material Data System) on . See appendix for sample IMDS operating instructions.The Supplier is responsible for obtaining an IMDS-module reference number for each part number supplied to Flex-N-Gate. The IMDS reference number must be included with the PPAP submission on the PPAP form (FQA.010) and the Warrant.A supplier PPAP package will not be approved without this reference number being included with the submission. The IMDS-module of this purchased component must also have been submitted and approved by the appropriate Flex-N-Gate / Seeburn branch. Refer to the appropriate FNG-IMDS addresses when submitting a module: FNG-Bradford #23149, Seeburn-Tottenham #25099, Seeburn-Beaverton #3541.Declarable substances in a Supplier’s product must be reported in a declaration statement. Action plan to remove these prohibited substances must be submitted. Must review Analysis-Tab for “Declared / Prohibited” (DIP) substances. Please reference IMDS system for document instructions on DIP substances.13. Customs Documentation (NAFTA Certificate of Origin, AALA, Traced Value)Suppliers must include three (3) customs documents with their PPAP submission – North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Certificate of Origin, American Automotive Labelling Act (AALA) Manufacturer’s Affidavit and a Traced Value Statement.A new NAFTA certificate, AALA, and Traced Value is required to be re-submitted with each subsequent part number revision, supplier change and/or new part.If supplier is based from a non-NAFTA country, then “statement” of origin must be submitted.A supplier PPAP package will not be approved without required documentation being included with the submission.Suppliers shall submit all NAFTA documents (NAFTA Certificate of Origin, AALA and Traced Value Statement) for each part number that appears on their Purchase Order annually.A copy of the Purchase Order shall be submitted along with the NAFTA documents. The package shall be sent via e-mail or courier to the plant specific Materials Coordinator by October 31st each year.See appendix for sample blank certificate and associated links to websites.Materials Requirements1. Material releasingDomestic suppliers shall receive a minimum of 2 weeks firm and a minimum 4 weeks planning and/or material authorization.Overseas suppliers shall receive a minimum of 4 weeks firm and a minimum of 8 weeks planning and/or material authorization.It is the responsibility of the Supplier to insure all requirements are met as directed by the release and / or purchase order.2. EDISuppliers shall be capable of receiving and sending EDI transmissions.Flex-N-Gate will transmit the AIAG 830 transaction set (Planning/Firm release) to the Supplier. The Supplier will be responsible for transmitting the AIAG 997 upon receipt of the 830 releases. The Supplier will also be responsible for transmitting the AIAG 856 transaction set (Advance Shipping Notice) to Flex-N-Gate, upon shipment of material.Suppliers that are not EDI compliant must submit an Action Plan to Flex-N-Gate advising timing for completion prior to production kick-off.The Supplier will be responsible for updating the Action Plan every 6 months until Flex-N-Gate confirms their EDI capability.The Supplier shall have a process to automatically update Flex-N-Gate release requirements into the Manufacturing system thereby insuring data integrity.See appendix EDI for transaction specifications.3. Bar code labellingAll material shipped by the Supplier shall be identified with a bar code label. All cartons/containers shall be labelled.The bar code label shall meet the specifications provided by Flex-N-Gate. A Master Label is required for multiple containers of the same part number on a single pallet.The Supplier must have a process in place for scanning all bar code labels to create shipping documents and the Advance Shipping Notice. Failure to label correctly may result in administrative chargesSee appendix for Bar Code Label specifications.4. PackagingComponent packaging will be reviewed on an individual basis.In general, material designated as hand transfer may not exceed 35 lbs.; one lift cannot weigh more than 2,000 lbs.; maximum height cannot exceed 48 inches per liftSteel handling will be reviewed on an individual basis.All coils must not exceed 72 inches OD and no less than 20 inches ID.All suppliers must support the IPPC standards of Bug-Free wood packaging. Please refer to web site link (http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/protect/dir/d-98-08e.shtml) for detailed information.5. DeliverySupplier is responsible for 100% on time delivery.Supplier will be responsible for any premium freight incurred by short shipments. In the case of over shipments, at the buyer’s discretion the over shipment may be returned at the supplier’s cost.Supplier will be responsible for all costs incurred by Flex-N-Gate and/or Flex-N-Gate’s Customer due to late or short shipments.Certified Safety Stock for Overseas Shipments: Supplier must maintain a minimum of 4 weeks worth of 100% certified stock on a rotational basis.6. Payment termsFlex-N-Gate will provide Suppliers with the same terms as specified by Flex-N-Gate’s Customers. Payment is approximately 2nd week of 2nd month following shipment.7. Supplier CommunicationThe Supplier must notify Flex-N-Gate within 5 days of a change in personnel to its Department Management team by means of the Supplier Information Sheet (FAP.008). See appendix for a copy.The Supplier must notify Flex-N-Gate within 24 hours of a production interruption. The nature of the problem shall be communicated to Flex-N-Gate and immediate actions taken place for continued supply of product to Flex-N-Gate.Suppliers with collective bargaining agreements will be responsible for providing Flex-N-Gate with an Action Plan for potential production interruptions 6 months prior to negotiations.Product volume change requests from Flex-N-Gate increasing volume by 20% or more over the previously verified volume capability shall require full volume feasibility studies.Supplier Performance1. Review FrequencyPerformance shall be monitored on a quarterly basis. Suppliers shall be given a rating number from one (1) to five (5). A rating of one (1) is the highest and a rating of five (5) the lowest.During the Sourcing and Quoting process for further potential business, Supplier Performance Ratings shall be considered as part of the review.2. Rating SystemSuppliers shall be rated in the following areas:1. Quality Performance2. Delivery Performance3. Price Reduction4. Engineering Support5. PPAP Submission6. RFQ Response7. Corrective Action ResponseQuality Performance shall be rated based on a PPM figure.The Supplier shall be given a numerical score of one (1), three (3) or five (5).0 - Not rated1 - meets or is below PPM target3 - exceeds PPM target5 - Quality non-conformance caused missed shipment to customer Delivery Performance shall be given a rating from one (1) to five (5). Since Flex-N-Gate practices J.I.T. manufacturing, Flex-N-Gate must depend on Suppliers to deliver the correct quantity, on time to the correct location. Therefore, early/late (1 day) shipments, short shipments or over shipments are not acceptable. Numerical scores are broken down as follows.0 - Not rated1 - Delivery 100% on time3 - 1 missed shipment5 - Habitual problems (more than one (1) occurrence) / or causedmissed shipment to customerPrice Reduction shall be rated on an annual basis. A rating of one (1) to five (5) will be awarded0 - Not rated1 - Supports cost reduction and makes improvement proposals3 - Supports cost reduction5 - Does not support cost reductionN/A - Not Applicable-rated annuallyEngineering Support shall be rated on an annual basis. The rating shall be performed by Product Engineering and Purchasing. The rating is subjective, but where possible, justification for the rating shall be provided. A rating number of either one (1), three (3) or five (5) shall be given.0 - Not rated1 - Provided validated performance improvements or validatedcost reduction proposals, as well as meeting requirements for athree (3) rating. (VA/VE proposals)3 - Provided necessary Engineering support with good responsetime.5 - Provided poor Engineering support, poor response time orrequest for late engineering changes.N/A - Not Applicable-rated annuallyPPAP Submission shall be given a rating of 1-5. (Monitored Quarterly)0 - Not Rated1 - 100% on time and approved3 - Late but approved5 - Late and rejectedRequest for Quotation Response shall be given a rating of 1-5. (Monitored Quarterly)0 - Not rated1 - 100% on time3 - Late replies5 - Late and not competitiveCorrective Action Response shall be given a rating of 1-5. (Monitored Quarterly)0 - Not rated1 - 100% on time; Adequate corrective action implemented3 - Late response; Inadequate corrective action implemented5 - No response / No corrective action implemented3. Supplier Award ProgramSuppliers that achieve exemplary performance will be given preference for future work.Suppliers that perform poorly will have limited opportunity for future business and may loose current business. In the first quarter of each year (January to March) Flex-N-Gate’s Quality, Engineering, Production and Purchasing Departments will select suppliers that qualify for “Supplier of the Year”. Only Suppliers who meet the following criteria will be eligible to qualify.The following areas will be considered for selection from the previous performance January 1st to December 31st.1. Quality Performance - Meets or exceeds PPM Targets; ISO 9001:2000 (or ISO/TS169492nd edition 2002) registered2. Delivery – 100% on time.3. Price Reduction – Supports yearly Cost Improvement.4. Engineering Support – Continually demonstrates advanced technology and supportsVA/VE activities with cost improvement proposals.5. PPAP Submission – 100% on time and approved.6. RFQ Response – 100 % on time and competitive.7. Demonstrates leadership in Community Involvement.8. Demonstrates leadership in Employee Satisfaction.9. Demonstrates leadership in – Health and Safety Activities (Frequency, Severity, ISO14000)4. Administrative ChargesFailure to comply with the requirements of this manual may incite administrative charges of $250.00 plus cost of outside services, as agreed.Standard Terms1. Standard terms and conditionsAll other standard terms and conditions can be found on the following website:/buspolicyAppendix1. Request for Quote – FAP.0062. Pre-Award Survey – FAP.0103. PPAP Request form – FQA.0104. Gauge / Fixture Standards5. Non-Conforming Material Request form – FQA.0366. NAFTA certificate / Certificate of Origin7. AIAG 830, 856 and 997 transaction sets8. Bar code label specification9. Supplier Information Sheet – FAP.00810. Bailment Receipt Form –FAP.02711. Tooling Information Sheet –FAP.02812. Bug-Free Wood Packaging IPPC standards13. IMDS Operating Instructions –introduction14. Onsite Assessment- FQA.183。
SQM程序文件和主要操作流程
Nonconforming Control Handling, Pkg.
Overall Average (%)
Criteria: Approved Conditionally Approved Not Approved
100.0%
90 ~ 100% 80 ~ 89% < 80 %
91.7%
Quality Record EICC
Output Vendor Survey Report
QSA Report
QPA Report
Non Critical Parts
SQRC Report
MP IQC SI MRB ECN
SCAR
PPAP/Safe Launch EC Management & Batch Run AVL Maintain
3.0
進料檢驗規范
特採作業程序 CE:新零件承認
G-QRA-08
特採作業程序文件 .doc
新零件承認規范 環保材料承認規范
I-CE-03 I-CE-02
SQM Main Operation Flow
Input
1. New Vendor. 2. Annually Audit Plan. 3. Customer Request. 4. To be defined as Critical Parts. 5. Parts with New Tech and Process. 1. VS / QSA / QPA & NCR CLCA. 2. Project Based SQRC Score. 3. FAI / FDI / CPK / Gauge R&R / PFMEA / Process Parameter / SOP / PMP / Quality Report (Ramp Up) / Drawings / EC Updating Recort 1. Manufacturing site change 2. Material change 3. Process / Subcontractor Change 4. Tooling / Design Change 5. Requested by Hipro RD / PM 6. 2nd sources phase in 1. IQC DR / LRR / VLRR. 2. QA Hold Production. 3. Customer Complaint 1. Quality / Cost / Delivery / Service / Technology Ranking.
Panasonic株式会社社长津贺一宏 松下的素直之心
Panasonic株式会社社长津贺一宏松下的素直之心
陈晓平
【期刊名称】《21世纪商业评论》
【年(卷),期】2018(000)006
【摘要】百年松下以归零心态去拥抱变化。
对津贺一宏而言,2018年是一个标志性的节点。
他掌舵的松下,迎来了一个新百年的开始。
自2012年中以来,他领导公司告别了巨亏的阴霾,2017财年实现了营收和利润的新高,尤其净利润增长了58%,公司平均营业利润率达到5%,现有37个事业部中,仅有3个高投入的事业部门未盈利,达到了其危难时接棒设定的业绩目标;
【总页数】2页(P20-21)
【作者】陈晓平
【作者单位】不详
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】F431.364
【相关文献】
1.试析松下幸之助"素直之心"的道德修养思想 [J], 李雪青
2.津贺一宏重构松下 [J], 范小毛
3.携着环保之梦创业怀着祖国之心献力——专访WWB株式会社社长龙润生 [J], 刘馨蔚[1]
4.津贺一宏：开启松下新纪元的领路人 [J], 王明勇;雷辉
5.松下津贺一宏强调不放弃家电业务 [J],
因版权原因，仅展示原文概要，查看原文内容请购买。
换个视角看松下——松下群马、八日市、彦根工厂及生产技术本部探访印象
换个视角看松下——松下群马、八日市、彦根工厂及生产技术本部探访印象于璇【期刊名称】《电器》【年(卷),期】2016(000)008【总页数】2页(P78-79)【作者】于璇【作者单位】【正文语种】中文“我们希望能为大家展现一个‘不同的松下’。
”随行的松下中国工作人员挂在口边的这句话，让《电器》记者开始转化视角，重新审视这家接近百岁高龄却在转型的“老”企业，并寻找那些“不同”。
冷链，是松下近年来积极布局且表现突出的领域。
所谓冷链，是为食物从产地到餐桌的全流程提供支撑的业务，涉及食物的运输、保管、加工和卖场售卖的各个环节，包括展示柜、商用冷柜/冰箱、制冰机、自动售货机、低温物流设备等各类产品。
松下冷链事业部目前在全球有5个生产据点，群马工厂是松下冷链事业部所在地，也是其在日本的唯一据点。
其余4个生产据点位于中国、泰国、美国和墨西哥。
同时，松下不久前收购了美国哈斯曼（Hussmann）公司，大大增强了松下冷链的竞争力。
据松下电化住宅设备机器公司冷链事业部长堤笃树透露，目前，松下食品流通事业的全球销售额已经超过3000亿日元，2018年度销售额目标为4000亿日元。
在此次群马工厂探访中，给《电器》记者留下最深印象的是松下针对便利店等商铺提供的系统解决方案。
据介绍，这套系统解决方案包括冷热饮料及食品展示柜、照明设备、监控设备等（见图1），各类设备均由松下各个事业部提供。
此类的系统解决方案，体现出松下在B2B领域希望实现的最优状态——超越事业部和事业公司的现有框架创造价值。
鉴于松下在B2B领域的积极布局，寻找并整合各事业领域的交叉价值，类似的解决方案无疑提升了各个事业部在竞争中的优势。
此外，松下冷链事业部在环保领域的推进也值得称道。
在堤笃树的介绍中，无论在日本应用CO2，还是中国采用R290，自然制冷剂的应用和推广都被列入松下冷链事业的发展重点清单中。
松下八日市工厂主要负责生产吸尘器、纸袋及厨余垃圾循环利用装置。
松下电工神视株式会社商品报告10月号
②
①
④ ③
对象机种
全部商品
变更时期
从2010年10月生产份开始实施变更。
3
商品报告
规格变更
经销商用
2010年10月 第855号 松下电工神视株式会社 松下电工（中国）有限公司 控制机器事业本部
内置放大器・超小型传感器 EX-L200
删除本体刻印CE标识的联络
变更内容
内置放大器・超小型激光传感器EX-L200系列，删除本体刻印之CE标识。 本次变更不对产品的订购产品号，型号，检测性能，检测特性，外形尺寸，价格作任何变更。
予以删除。 CE标识由于印刷在警示铭牌上，客户可依此判断产品是否取得CE认证。
警示铭牌 透过型则贴附在投光器的电缆线上。
对象机种
EX-L200系列全机种
变更时期
从2010年9月生产份开始实施变更。
4
商品报告
经销商用
2010年10月 第856号 松下电工神视株式会社 松下电工（中国）有限公司 控制机器事业本部
型号
EX-15 EX-15-C5 EX-15E EX-15E-C5 EX-17 EX-17-C5 EX-17E EX-17E-C5 EX-19A EX-19A-C5 EX-19A-PN EX-19A-R EX-19B EX-19B-C5 EX-19B-PN EX-19B-R
变更时期
2010年10月生产份开始实施变更。（依次实施替换）
化学物质管理等级准则-Panasonic
1
3
运用及豁免
售时及销售地区的条约、法律、条例、同业界指针及其他必要条件，并且遵守本准则。
(1) 根据主要的法律限制来制定，但由于不是全部网罗，对个别产品等的运用，要完全遵守销 (2) 结合 Panasonic 集团事业公司、事业场的情况（例：收货方的要求等） ，如果事业公司或事 业场独自设定了高于本准则规定内容的标准，应向相关人员（供应商等）传达。 (3) 关于可豁免适用本准则及可延期适用的项目、需要与本准则区分管理的项目、有可能不属 于本准则适用范围的项目，在《Panasonic 集团化学物质管理等级准则(产品版)的公司内 部运用管理细则》中有另行规定。此外，如涉及以上项目，将根据需要传达给相关人员(供 应商等)。
5.15
交付禁止日
是指禁止供应商（包括 Panasonic 的事业场）向 Panasonic 集团交付部件、元器件和材料等的 日期。
2
5.4
2 级禁止物质 属于 1 级禁止物质所规定的物质以外，以所有下面所示物质为对象。 (1) 由条约、法律限制规定期限禁止产品含有的物质 (2) Panasonic 集团推进比条约、法律限制所规定的期限提前禁止产品含有的物质 (3) 由 Panasonic 集团的主动工作限制使用的物质 如有确认本物质的产品含有的时候，必须按照本准则所规定的期限和限制条件推进代替。
5.5
3 级禁止物质 属于 1 级禁止物质和 2 级禁止物质所规定的物质以外，但是由于各类法律限制已在考虑禁 止其使用，根据今后法律限制的变化趋势，Panasonic 集团在明确了寻找其代替品的课题 的同时，考虑确定其禁止时期的物质，目前不设定产品含有的禁止时期。
5.6
管理物质 指应该掌握使用实际情况，考虑健康、安全卫生、适当处理等的物质。对象的物质为，并 非限制有意使用，而是应该对于有无使用及含有浓度掌握数据的物质。有关成为对象的管 理物质，将“有意使用”、或者“已知含有”的情形作为把握对象。
松下电器机电贸易（上海）有限公司介绍企业发展分析报告
Enterprise Development专业品质权威Analysis Report企业发展分析报告松下电器机电贸易（上海）有限公司免责声明:本报告通过对该企业公开数据进行分析生成，并不完全代表我方对该企业的意见，如有错误请及时联系;本报告出于对企业发展研究目的产生，仅供参考，在任何情况下，使用本报告所引起的一切后果，我方不承担任何责任:本报告不得用于一切商业用途，如需引用或合作，请与我方联系:松下电器机电贸易（上海）有限公司1企业发展分析结果1.1 企业发展指数得分企业发展指数得分松下电器机电贸易（上海）有限公司综合得分说明：企业发展指数根据企业规模、企业创新、企业风险、企业活力四个维度对企业发展情况进行评价。
该企业的综合评价得分需要您得到该公司授权后，我们将协助您分析给出。
1.2 企业画像类别内容行业计算机、通信和其他电子设备制造业-电子器件制造资质增值税一般纳税人产品服务，电子部件及器件，汽车零部件，工厂自动化1.3 发展历程2工商2.1工商信息2.2工商变更2.3股东结构2.4主要人员2.5分支机构2.6对外投资2.7企业年报2.8股权出质2.9动产抵押2.10司法协助2.11清算2.12注销3投融资3.1融资历史3.2投资事件3.3核心团队3.4企业业务4企业信用4.1企业信用4.2行政许可-工商局4.3行政处罚-信用中国4.5税务评级4.6税务处罚4.7经营异常4.8经营异常-工商局4.9采购不良行为4.10产品抽查4.12欠税公告4.13环保处罚4.14被执行人5司法文书5.1法律诉讼（当事人）5.2法律诉讼（相关人）5.3开庭公告5.4被执行人5.5法院公告5.6破产暂无破产数据6企业资质6.1资质许可6.2人员资质6.3产品许可6.4特殊许可7知识产权7.1商标7.2专利7.3软件著作权7.4作品著作权7.5网站备案7.6应用APP7.7微信公众号8招标中标8.1政府招标8.2政府中标8.3央企招标8.4央企中标9标准9.1国家标准9.2行业标准9.3团体标准9.4地方标准10成果奖励10.1国家奖励10.2省部奖励10.3社会奖励10.4科技成果11 土地11.1大块土地出让11.2出让公告11.3土地抵押11.4地块公示11.5大企业购地11.6土地出租11.7土地结果11.8土地转让12基金12.1国家自然基金12.2国家自然基金成果12.3国家社科基金13招聘13.1招聘信息感谢阅读:感谢您耐心地阅读这份企业调查分析报告。
供方信息调查和审核记录表
XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORMXXX供方调查和审核表SUPPLIER'S SURVEY DATE : 供方调查日期：SUPPLIER'S NAME :供方名称：ADDRESS:地址：PHONE NO : FAX NO :电话：传真：PRODUCT SUPPLIED :供应的产品REASON FOR THE SURVEY / AUDIT调查 / 审核原因INITIAL AUDIT (NEW SUPPLIER)初步审核（新分承包）现场审核REGULAR AUDIT定期审核PERFORMANCE NOT SATISFACTORY工作不满意之外SELF SURVEY供方自查OTHERS (SPECIFY)其他（特定）AUDIT / SELF SURVEY PERFORMED BY :审核 / 自查执行人REPRESENTATIVES / REVIEW代表 / 审核XXX SUPPLIERXXX 供方XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORMXXX供方调查和审核表ASSESSMENT AREA Actual Rating 评估内容Points Points1.组织机构2.采购控制3.进货材料4.不合格品控制（过程中和最后出货）5.生产线控制6.S PC7.在线检验8.校验9.设备维护10.文件和图纸控制11.最终产品检验12.包装和发货13.培训和教育14.清洁、搬运、储存TOTALOVERALL RATING%总得分比率FINAL OUTSTANDING (ABOVE 90%) SATISFACTORY (75%-90%)优异满意RATING NEED IMPROVEMENT (60%-74.9%) POOR (BELOW 60%)需改进不合格（低于60％）RATING SCALEPOINT INTERPRETATION 说明4 - OUTSTANDING 优异的3 - SATISFACTORY 满意2 - NEED IMPROVEMENT 需改进1 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 重大缺陷0 - NO SYSTEM 无系统XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORMXXX供方调查和审核表REQUEST FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION纠正措施申请单Supplier response DUE DATE :供方回复到期日：2003.11.30（将回复传回XXX的日期）Supplier response by: 供方回复人：Title: 职位CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFICATION纠正措施效果确认（由XXX稽核员填写）XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORMXXX供应商调查和审核表EVALUATION RESULT评估结果GENERAL COMMENTS :概述：XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供应商调查和审核表Ref : OSPR02 Serial : 01XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX 供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX 供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表XXX供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX 供方调查和审核表XXX SUPPLIER SURVEY AND AUDIT FORM XXX供方调查和审核表。
松下电器：创造“普适性”未来
Ｂｕｓｉｎｅｓｓ Ｇｅｏｇｒａｐｈｙ・国家穿越 松下电器： ａ ｎ ａ Ｓ ｏ ｎ叠Ｃ
创造“普适性＂未来 文／李攀 深刻理解并运用“泛网社会 的组织原理和模型． 在削减成本的同时增加价值．是松下得以复兴的最大“秘密武器 ｏ
透过前方玻璃板上的两个小圆洞望进去，可以体验白内障 患者的视觉感受：在一片如毛玻璃般的翳影中，最易识别的色 彩是桔黄色。因此，松下电器新研发的一款电饭煲的按钮被设 计成枯黄色。”商品是设计者人格的体现。”松下“技术之魂”中 尾哲＿－￣５５０年前的名言，看来正在被赋予新的内涵。
梦想照进现实 在松下大阪总部的”Ｐａｎａｓｏｎｉｃ中心”内，记者见到并触摸到 许多新奇的产品，诸如可以避免家庭主妇腰肌劳损的斜式滚桶 洗衣机、带扶手的电子马桶、适应乘坐轮椅者身体高度的电梯 开关等等，其中一些已经投入市场，一些还属于“概念产品”。这 些都基于松下正在全力推行的“普适性设计”（Ｕ ｎ１ ｖｅ ｒ ｓ ａ１ Ｄｅｓｉｇｎ）理念，即不分用户的年龄、性别和体质状况，都能提供友 好的、人性化的产品。 松下￣Ｐａｎａｓｏｎｉｃ中心定义为一个与用户进行直接交流的 “协作中心”，来访者不仅可以体验最新的技术成果和产品，还 能了解某种产品研发的依据。例如，可以通过立式触摸屏和墙 上的等离子电视，认知一个用于设计厨房设备的“动作评价研 究系统”。该系统将可能的用户群细分为７个年龄段，以每１０岁 为”一代”，综合评估各类用户的身高、动作幅度及使用习惯等 数据，以设计大多数人都能方便操作的产品。由此可见，所谓 “普适性”首先是做到普遍的”可用性”，同时为有特殊需要的用 户进行定制服务。 在这个宗旨为”努力实现未来之梦”的体验中心里，“普适 性”理念并不仅仅限于具体的产品设计。设计只是一种工具，其 终极目标是，要达成松下在新世纪里为自己树立的两个使命一 一实现“星罗棋布的网络社会”（Ｕｂｉｑｕｉｔｏｕｓ Ｎｅｔｗｏｒｋ Ｓｏｃｉｅｔｙ， 或称”泛网社会”）以及“与地球环境共存”。整个中心的内部空间 设计正是划分为“泛网社会”、”环保”和”普适性设计”三个主题 单元。 “泛网社会”最前端演示的是一套家庭影音娱乐系统，除了 超大超薄的等离子显示屏和酷感十足的产品外观设计，其独特 之处在于：一个遥控器就可以控制电视、ＤＶＤ机和音响、功放等 设备。电视机下方还有一个“数码插销”，只要使用松下的一张 “超高速存储卡”，就可以在数码相机、摄录机和影音播放系统 间实现文件共享。松下设计公司总裁Ｔｏｙｏｙｕｋｉ Ｕｅｍａｔｓｕ把这套
新质量时代 — 从全面质量管理到全面创新管理——以松下电器工匠式创新为例
77毛武兴 | 文毛武兴：北京松下普天通信设备有限公司董事、副总裁本文认为中国经济领域将在新常态、新结构和新消费中迎来新质量时代；质量提升和创新驱动是当前中国企业管理实践中最重要的着力点；工匠精神本身就是对自己的产品或工作精雕细琢、精益求精，追求更完美的精神理念，也包含有创新的内涵；工匠式创新是质量提升、产品创新的主要实现途径，也是中国走进新质量时代的必然选择。
本文简要回顾了工业化生产制造管理从关注效率到质量的发展历史以及一些主要的管理技术，介绍了企业全面创新管理（TIM）理论以及在全面质量管理（TQM）基础上的工匠式创新，最后简要介绍松下电器集团工匠式创新的主要做法及文化溯源，希望能对中国企业的质量提升和创新管理有所启示和借鉴。
工业化生产制造管理实践发展历史：从效率到质量工业生产制造从手工作坊向现代自动化大机器工厂转变和发展，一般认为期间经历了三次工业革命，第一次以蒸汽机的发明和使用为标志称为蒸汽时代，之后为第二次工业革中国经济领域将在新常态、新结构和新消费中迎来新质量时代；质量提升和创新驱动是当前中国企业管理实践中最重要的着力点；工匠精神本身就是对自己的产品或工作精雕细琢、精益求精，追求更完美的精神理念，也包含有创新的内涵；工匠式创新是质量提升、产品创新的主要实现途径，也是中国走进新质量时代的必然选择。
—以松下电器工匠式创新为例命后的电气时代和第三次工业革命的自动化时代。
生产制造的管理技术从科学管理之父泰勒开创的基于劳动分工提高劳动效率和降低成本的工业工程（IE），逐渐发展到质量控制和管理（QC）以及价值工程（VE），一百多年来大致情况如图1。
这里工业工程（IE）是从科学管理基础上发展起来的一门应用性工程专业技术，是改善效率、成本、品质的科学方法，是对人、物料、设备、能源和住处进行规划、设计、管理、改进、创新等活动，使其达到降低成本，提高质量和效益的目的的一项活动。
IE的基础是最早来自于“工作研究”，在日本也被称为“生产技术”或“管理工学”。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Date 日期 Supplier Name: / 供应商名称： Supplier Location:/供应商地址： Auditor:/审核员 SQA Manager:SQA 经理 ※ Rate each item 1 through 5/每一项分数值为1-5
对应部署
Remarks/备注
体系室 体系室 体系室
2 3
4
体系室
5 Organization/ Human resource / 组织、人力资源
体系室
6
体系室2 13 14 15
If reliability testing is performed, does the reliability testing suit car use and is the system implemented? (Initial fluid management, fixed period) Contents of test, Standard of sampling test, Frequency, Place, etc. 品管，体 Does the supplier have a process 如果做可靠性试验，该可靠性试验是否适合汽车使用，且系统 系室 是否贯彻实施？（初始过程管理，试验周期）实验内容，试验样件，频率，试验场所等，该供应商有这方面 的流程？ Is the quality department independent? What is the quality organizational structure? 品管，体 品管课是否为一个独立的部门？质量组织机构怎样？
体系室， 总务 体系室 体系室 体系室 体系室 体系室 体系室
Process control / 过程控制
16
17
体系室
18
Are there appropriate construction method, working method, jig-tool? Can they provide stable manufacture of quality? [Appropriateness of working method and jig-tool/ Unstable operation/ Variations of 体系室， operators/ Management when changing operation/ Metho 是否有正确的组织方法，工作方法和治 组立 具？这些能够保证产品质量稳定生产吗？[合理的操作方法和治具/不稳定作业/作业员的变差/作业变更管理/ 方法] clear differentiation between good products and defect products? (Indications and fixed position Is there marking), etc.)[Before inspection and after inspection][Accepted lot and rejected lot, etc.] 良品和不良品是否有明显的区别？（表示和标记位置）等）[待检品和已检品] [合格批量和不合格批量等]
Category/ NO./项 分类 目号 1 Quality policy / 质量方针 Individual Item for Evaluation/评估项
Has the supplier provided components to the automotive industry? If not, is there an intention to do so? 该供应商是否已经给汽车工业提供零部件？如果没有，是否有这一意向？ Automotive customer base 100% = 5; 75% = 4; 50% = 3; 25% = 2; <25% = 1 自动车客户评分标准：100% = 5; 75% = 4; 50% = 3; 25% = 2; Does the supplier have a quality policy and does the organization follow it? 该供应商是否有质量方针并且贯彻执行？ Does the supplier understand and comply to the environmental standards such as GMW3059, ELV or RoHS? Is there a policy, organizational support and equipment to comply? 该供应商是否理解并遵守环境标 准例如GMW3059，ELV或RoHS？是否有环境方针，组织支援和设备来履行这一标准？ Does the supplier comply to ISO-9000, QS-9000 or TS16949 standards? Register, IATF Certificate number, date and next surveillance audit. 该供应商是否通过ISO-9000，QS-9000或TS16949，注册，IATF 成员证书，注册日期和下次审查日期。 Does the supplier have different processes for automotive and other customer industries such as consumer products? ［Sampling standard, Equipment designation, Operator designation, Examination items, Determination value, etc.］ 该供应商是否为汽车行业或其他行业，例如消费品行业生产多种产品？[标准样件，设备操作指示书，作业 指示书，检查项目，判定值等。] What is the supplier's problem solving capability? (Organization, Problem Solving Method, Laboratory Equipment and Countermeasure Tracking) [Defect analysis technique, reproduction experiment verification, FTA analysis, outflow prevention and defect occur 供应商在解决问题能力方面有什么问题？（组织机构，解决问题的方法，实验室设备和对策跟踪）[缺陷分 析方法，再生产验证，FTA分析，防止流出和缺陷再发生] What is the supplier response time to a problem? ［Temporary countermeasure and fundamental countermeasure/Analysis of wherefores/Cooperation with QC, engineer and factory/Schedule of target response, etc.］ 供应商对问题的反映时间？[暂定对策和永久对策/原因分析/QC、工程师和工厂之间的合作打合/报告纳期等]
系室
What is the employee training policy? What is the reward system? 员工培训方针是什么？奖励方法是什么？ Does the supplier have an appropriate work environment? (5S Lighting/ Dust control/ Noise/ ESD/ Power surge, etc) 供应商是否有合适的工作环境？（5S 照明/灰尘控制/噪声/ESD/能源浪费等） Does the supplier have appropriate layout and flow of material? (Lean manufacturing, process skip/ Needless move/ Detention of in-process products/ Mixing of different models, etc.］ 供应商是否有合 适的材料流动和规划？（不合理（倾向）生产，过程跳跃/不必要的移动/过程产品滞留/不同产品混淆等] Does the supplier have appropriate control plans and are they followed including subcontractors? 供应商是否后合理的控制计划并且贯彻执行，包括分供应商在内？ Does the supplier identify KPC, KCC or PQC in the control plan? Are these characteristics controlled? Are these characteristics determined by the FMEAs? 供应商是否在控制计划中识别KPC，KCC或PQC？这些特性得到控制了吗？这些特性是通过FMEA确定的 吗？ the supplier use SPC/Data analysis tools to control or reduce variation? Does 供应商是否采用SPC/数据分析工具来控制或减少变差？ Does the supplier have product traceability? ［Narrowing down the number of target against abnormal lot is appropriate when lot problems occur? How about traceability, they can trace repair?］ 供应商是否有产品可追溯性？[当批量问题出现时，可以对出现问题的批量缩小目标数据进行追查，可追溯性 是怎样的，可以追溯并修正吗？ Does the supplier have appropriate work instructions? Are they posted for the operator? Are they followed? Are there appropriate standards? 供应商是否有正确的作业指示书？这些作业指示书传达给操作者并且得到遵守了吗？有合适的标准吗？