5000字英文范文翻译类

In new network on 2 September Xinhua comprehensive report, the situation in Syria is currently in the United States of America in the teeth of the storm, President Obama issued a statement in August 31st, decided to take military action against the Syrian government target, the White House has formally asked Congress to authorize. But in the United States, Obama faces two trials of Congress and the public; in foreign countries, the multinational NATO would not send troops, many countries also oppose the United States plans. Analysis refers to the Syrian military command, Obama was "imminent", but his support for the difficulties, may "itself".The contradiction: the Congress attitude unknown Obama fears "riding a tiger"Local time on August 31st, the United States President Barack Obama issued a statement at the White House, said that "after careful consideration, I have decided that the United States should the regime in Syria to take military action against the target. It will not be indefinite intervention, we will not send ground troops, instead we aim to limit the action time and scale."But Obama said, he also made second decisions, is "to get authorization from Congress to", only the consent of Congress, I ordered the U.S. war on Syria. On the same day, the official White House to Congress a proposal, according to the United States Congress "War Powers Act" and the United Nations Security Council in 2004 passed a resolution, authorized the president to take military action in Syria.In the proposal, Obama asked Congress to use the authorization bill Syria, intended to deter, prevent and reduce blow, Syria continue to use chemical weapons and other weapons of mass destruction in the future. He also said, Syria internal conflict was resolved by political consultation.The analysis thinks, Obama remarks on the question of Syria to slam the brakes, to seek congressional approval for a military attack against Syria, is likely to lead to the United States at least 10 days delay action.However, Obama this "gambling" type decision will make it a tough fight. Obama broke the decades of practice, has announced that it will seek congressional approval Syria suspected use chemical weapons to act. But the United States senators would support Obama, will defeat him swallow bitter is still uncertain.Analysis pointed out that, Obama this bet is risky, he bet he could get Congress agreed to a limited attack Syria, defending against the international ban, the United States national security interests, and to protect Turkey, Jordan, Israel and other allies in the middle east.Obama had previously insisted, he retained ignore Congress decided to attack the right, White House officials said the change would give Obama more time to win internationalsupport. But for Obama, the most difficult and most threatening the authority of the president's war, or between members of Congress of political wrangling, because it cannot determine the Congress will support the attack on Syria.Observers caution, Obama could face the same fate with British Prime Minister Cameron. Cameron for the British Parliament authorized military action, but was rejected.Obama may be full of confidence, that he can win the vote in the Democratic controlled senate. The Senate also has many Republicans to take military action. However, he is in the house of Representatives won the support of the opportunity is not sure. The house has many conservative core people everywhere, to interfere with Obama's plan.In addition, the American people on the government military intervention plan highlights the ambivalence, and the Obama administration, Congress and the U.S. is unease shrouded. The Afghan war and the Iraq war, costly delay for a long time, the American people are unwilling to once again involved in the conflict in the middle east.The United States National Broadcasting Company (NBC) recently in a poll, half of Americans polled for the government of Syria military strikes do not support, only 35% behind Obama in the process encountered a time he was the most difficult questions of the 700 respondents.Only 1/5 of respondents said the military action, which is in the American national interest, and only 27% of the people think that the military can make the situation in Syria.If the United States to take action, 56% of people said that, the aim should be to prevent the use of chemical weapons. Only a small number of people (16% or less), military action to overthrow the Assad regime or stop Syria clashes between government forces and armed opposition.Outside the opposition: 12 NATO countries to the international community to anti war emotionWhen Obama published "on the Syrian military" statement on the same day, the United States anti war organizations held a protest outside the White House, shouting anti war slogans. People playing white banners and placards reading "not yellow, the Syrian war", "the Syrian military built on lies" etc.. The activities of the organization responsible person said, the day before and after the estimated 500 people have been involved in the protests, the organizers also prepared during the three day "Labor Day" long weekend continue to hold protest in front of the White House, where all over the United States would have to Washington to participate in.In August 31st, the British capital London is also the outbreak of large-scaledemonstrations, oppose aggression against Syria. According to the organization of this parade "anti war alliance", a total of 5000 people took part in the parade.The British Parliament in August 29th voted against Prime Minister Cameron to attack Syria's proposal, was named the greatest shame Cameron to be in power for three years "suffer". Although Obama assured Cameron that the relationship between them is still strong, but the British media will Cameron's the signs of failure as the so-called "special relationship" and "doomsday". They worry, support for military action.。