伦敦交通拥堵费London congestion
交通拥堵费 congestion fee
交通拥堵费 congestion fee2010年05月06日09:09英语点津我要评论(9)字号：T|T尽管采取了单双号限行等措施，但北京的交通拥堵问题远没有解决。
近日，住房和城乡建设部副部长仇保兴为北京交通支招，提议除了提高城市中心区停车收费，加强对公交专用道的管理之外，可以研究征收交通拥堵费。
请看《中国日报》的报道：He cited the case of London, which since 2003, has charged a congestion fee for vehicles entering the inner city. Initially five pounds ($7.5) the fee now stands at 8 pounds.他（仇保兴）以伦敦为例：伦敦自2003年起对进入市中心的车辆征收交通拥堵费，最初为5英镑（合7.5美元），现已增至8英镑。
文中的congestion fee就是指“交通拥堵费”，也称为congestion charge。
Congestion在这里就是traffic congestion，因此这项收费也称为traffic jam fee。
具体指在交通拥挤时段对部分区域道路使用者收取一定的费用，做法最初来自于上世纪70年代的新加坡。
为缓解交通拥堵问题，北京市已经出台了多项措施，下面我们就来梳理一下相关说法。
单双号限行：odd-and-even license plate rule设立“P+R停车场”：park-and-ride parking lots，也称为泊车换乘停车场。
错时上下班：staggered rush hour plan公交专用车道：bus lane快速公交专用车道: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lane上调“停车费”：daytime parking fees开展“无车日”活动：car-free day我要评论(9)相关阅读:·英语热词：一线城市 first-tier city 2010.04.01。
描述伦敦交通问题英语作文
描述伦敦交通问题英语作文London's Transportation Challenges: A Comprehensive OverviewLondon is a bustling metropolis, renowned for its rich history, vibrant culture, and iconic landmarks. However, the city's transportation system has long been a source of frustration for both residents and visitors alike. In this comprehensive essay, we will delve into the various challenges faced by London's transportation network and explore potential solutions to alleviate these issues.One of the primary concerns surrounding London's transportation is the issue of congestion. The city's roads are often clogged with an overwhelming number of vehicles, leading to significant delays and frustration for commuters. This problem is exacerbated by the sheer volume of traffic, with an estimated 2.6 million cars and 525,000 licensed drivers in the Greater London area. The influx of private vehicles, coupled with the limited road infrastructure, has resulted in a transportation system that struggles to keep up with the demand.Another pressing issue is the overcrowding of public transportation. London's underground system, commonly known as the "Tube," is a vital component of the city's transportation network, transportingmillions of passengers daily. However, during peak hours, the Tube can become uncomfortably crowded, with commuters often forced to squeeze into overcrowded carriages. This not only creates an unpleasant travel experience but also raises concerns about passenger safety and the overall efficiency of the system.The problem of air pollution is another significant challenge facing London's transportation landscape. The high volume of vehicular traffic, combined with the city's geography and urban density, has led to the accumulation of harmful pollutants in the air. This issue has become a major public health concern, with studies linking air pollution to respiratory diseases, cardiovascular problems, and even premature deaths. The need to address this environmental crisis has become increasingly urgent, as the city strives to improve the overall quality of life for its residents.In addition to these pressing issues, London's transportation system also faces challenges related to accessibility and inclusivity. For individuals with disabilities or mobility issues, navigating the city's transportation network can be a daunting task. Accessibility features, such as ramps, elevators, and tactile paving, are not consistently available across all modes of transportation, making it difficult for these individuals to travel independently.Furthermore, the cost of transportation in London can be asignificant burden, particularly for low-income residents. The rising prices of public transportation fares and the high cost of owning and maintaining a private vehicle can make it challenging for some individuals to access essential services, employment opportunities, and social activities.To address these multifaceted challenges, a comprehensive and coordinated approach is required. The local government, transportation authorities, and urban planners must work together to implement a range of strategies and solutions.One potential solution to the congestion problem is the implementation of a robust public transportation system that encourages a modal shift away from private vehicles. This could involve expanding the Tube network, improving bus services, and investing in sustainable modes of transportation, such as cycling and walking. Additionally, the introduction of congestion pricing schemes, which charge drivers for entering certain areas of the city during peak hours, could help to reduce the number of vehicles on the roads.To tackle the issue of overcrowding on public transportation, investments in infrastructure upgrades and capacity expansions are crucial. This could include the construction of new Tube lines, the addition of more carriages to existing trains, and the optimization ofscheduling and frequency of services to better meet the demands of commuters.Addressing the air pollution crisis will require a multifaceted approach, including the implementation of low-emission zones, the promotion of electric and hybrid vehicles, and the enhancement of pedestrian and cycling infrastructure. The city can also explore the potential of alternative fuel sources, such as hydrogen and biofuels, to power its transportation fleet.Improving accessibility and inclusivity within the transportation system is also a critical priority. This may involve the installation of elevators and ramps in all Tube stations, the provision of accessible buses and taxis, and the development of comprehensive wayfinding systems to assist individuals with disabilities or mobility challenges.Finally, addressing the issue of affordability is essential to ensure that all residents, regardless of their socioeconomic status, have access to affordable transportation options. This could include the expansion of concessionary fare schemes, the introduction of subsidies for low-income families, and the integration of different modes of transportation to create a more seamless and cost-effective travel experience.In conclusion, London's transportation challenges are multifacetedand require a holistic approach to address the various issues at hand. By implementing a range of strategies and solutions, the city can work towards a more efficient, sustainable, and inclusive transportation system that meets the needs of its diverse population. Through collaborative efforts and a commitment to innovation, London can transform its transportation landscape and emerge as a model for other cities to emulate.。
伦敦拥堵收费政策及其对交通安全的影响
伦敦拥堵收费政策及其对交通安全的影响伦敦拥堵收费政策，也被称为“拥堵收费”或“城市拥堵收费”，是一项针对驾驶车辆在工作日高峰时段进入伦敦市中心的收费政策。
这项政策于2003年2月启动，旨在减少交通拥堵，改善空气质量，提高交通运输效率。
在该政策下，所有驾驶车辆进入“拥堵收费区”的地区都必须支付拥堵收费，否则将被罚款。
伦敦拥堵收费政策的实施对交通安全有着积极的影响。
首先，该政策减少了交通拥堵现象，使道路通行更加顺畅。
车辆之间的空间增加，车辆速度平稳提升，从而减少了交通事故的发生可能性。
据统计数据显示，自拥堵收费政策实施以来，伦敦市中心的交通事故数量有较显著的下降。
其次，由于减少了交通堵塞，救援车、警车和消防车等急需通过的紧急车辆得以更迅速地响应，进而提高了紧急救助工作的效率。
此外，伦敦拥堵收费政策的实施还促使更多的居民选择使用公共交通或非机动车出行，减少了私家车在市区的行驶量。
这不仅有助于减少尾气排放，改善空气质量，还降低了道路拥堵带来的压力，有效提高了城市的整体交通运行效率。
对于那些仍然需要开车进入拥堵收费区的人来说，更容易找到停车位，减少了寻找停车位所需的时间和精力，减少了在寻找停车位时可能引发的交通事故风险。
另外，伦敦拥堵收费政策的收费标准会根据车辆排放等级来定，从而鼓励人们购买更环保的车辆。
这也间接地推动了汽车产业向更环保的方向发展，进一步减少了空气污染，提高了城市的居住环境。
另外，拥堵收费政策的实施也为城市的可持续发展和绿色出行提供了示范。
然而，伦敦拥堵收费政策也存在一些争议。
一些批评者认为，政策实施后可能会导致一些驾驶车辆选择绕行，并增加了周边道路的交通负担。
此外，一些商家担心拥堵收费政策将减少他们的客流量，影响他们的营业额。
针对这些问题，政府应该采取更加全面、综合的交通管理措施，以确保政策的效果最大化，化解争议。
总的来说，伦敦拥堵收费政策的实施对交通安全有着积极的影响。
通过减少道路拥堵、改善交通运行效率、推动环保交通发展等多方面措施，有效提高了城市的交通安全水平。
关于租车常用英语
租车英语Useful Words and Expressions in Rental Car Part A 租车常见词汇Automatic transmission自动挡Manual transmission 手动挡driving license 驾照pick up/drop-off 取车/还车snow tire/snow chain 雪胎/雪链drop-off location 还车地点empty tank 空箱（汽油）full tank 满箱（汽油）gas pedal 油门license plate 牌照Rental Agreement 租赁协议transfer 接送服务delivery 送车上门collection 上门取车deposit押金Pre-authorization 预售权reservation 预定prepaid 预付over time 超时optional service 额外服务rental period 租赁期vehicle license fee 车辆执照费roadside assistance 道路救援extra mileage charge 超公里计费supplier 供应商rental contract 租车合约unlimited mileage 不限里程upgrade 升级voucher 租车凭证estimate charge 预计价格grand total 总计Congestion charge 交通拥堵费（伦敦）petrol 汽油diesel 柴油roadster/convertible 敞蓬车four-wheel drive 四轮驱动front-wheel drive 前轮驱动汽车外设：External Parts: backup light/reversing ligh倒车灯bodywork / body 车身bonnet 发动机盖bumper 保险杠wing 前翼子板chassis 底盘front wheel 前轮front blinker 前信号灯radiator grille 水箱rear blinker 转弯指示灯rear wheel 后轮rear window 后窗玻璃roof rack/ luggage rack 行李架stoplight / stop lamp 刹车灯taillight / tail lamp 尾灯tailpipe 排气管tread [tred] 轮距windscreen wiper 雨刮器Windshield 挡风玻璃汽车内设：Interior Parts:Air condition 空调back seat / rear seat 后座brake pedal 刹车踏板choke 熄火装置dashboard 仪表板milometer 里程表passenger seat 旅客席rear-view mirror/ driving mirror 后视镜seat belt 安全带spare wheel 备胎,备用轮胎speedometer / clock 速度表starter / self-starter 起动器steering wheel / wheel 方向盘Fuel gauge 油表horn / hooter 喇叭用车中over speed 超速damage 车损garage 车库excess 起赔额traffic ticket 罚单have a flat tire 爆胎scratch 刮痕third party 第三者engine oil 机油crash 撞车fill the tank 加油tire pressure 轮胎气压mechanical failure 机械故障break down 抛锚windows smashed 车窗被砸Property 财物。
拥堵收费的利弊及实施难点分析
拥堵收费的利弊及实施难点分析【摘要】本文主要探讨拥堵收费的利弊及实施难点分析。
在介绍了拥堵收费的背景和研究目的。
接着在分别阐述了拥堵收费的概念和原理、利益和优势分析、不利因素和弊端分析、实施难点分析以及国内外的案例分析。
最后在结论部分对拥堵收费的可行性进行分析，并提出合理建议。
通过本文的研究，可以更深入地了解拥堵收费政策的影响和实施难点，为相关决策提供参考。
【关键词】拥堵收费、利弊分析、实施难点、案例分析、可行性、建议。
1. 引言1.1 背景介绍拥堵收费是一种通过对车辆通行拥堵区域进行收费来缓解交通拥堵的措施。
随着城市化进程的加快和汽车数量的增加，交通拥堵已经成为许多城市面临的严重问题。
拥堵不仅影响市民出行效率，还对城市经济发展和环境造成负面影响。
越来越多的城市开始考虑推行拥堵收费政策来减轻交通压力。
拥堵收费的原理是通过经济手段引导市民选择公共交通工具或者高峰时段错峰出行，从而减少道路拥堵。
收取拥堵费用也可以用于改善交通基础设施和促进公共交通建设，提高城市交通运行效率。
虽然拥堵收费能够有效缓解交通拥堵问题，但是在实施过程中也面临着诸多挑战和困难。
如何确定收费标准、确保收费公平、解决群众反对等问题都是需要认真考虑的。
拥堵收费的实施难点不容忽视，需要综合考虑各方利益，精心设计政策措施，才能取得良好的效果。
1.2 研究目的拥堵收费的研究目的旨在探讨该政策措施在解决交通拥堵和改善城市交通状况方面的作用和效果。
通过对拥堵收费的概念和原理、利益和优势分析以及不利因素和弊端分析，了解其在实际应用中可能产生的影响和局限性。
通过对拥堵收费的实施难点进行分析，探讨该政策在实际操作中可能遇到的困难和挑战，并提出具体的解决方案和建议。
通过国内外的案例分析，对比和参考其他地区对拥堵收费政策的实施情况和效果，为我国的相关政策制定和实施提供借鉴和参考。
最终，结合对拥堵收费的可行性分析和合理建议，为我国城市交通管理和规划提供科学的决策支持，促进城市交通运输体系的完善和优化。
伦敦征收交通拥堵费治堵
台措 施限制 私家 车，在治理 城市 道路拥 度 约 １３５５公里 、４６８个停靠 站 点的庞 大
堵方面颇有成效 。
系统 。
在 全美 备大 城市 中，纽约 市利用 公
美 国纽 约大 学瓦格 纳公共 事务 学院
共交通 出行 的比例最 高 。纽 约大都会 运 终身教 授郭 湛对记 者表 示，纽约 地铁的
公民与法治 Ｉ ２０１６．２下
费区，并可在同 日多次驶入驶离收费区 。 残 障乘客载运车辆 、部 拥 堵 费 提 前 交 或 当 日交 的基 准 收 费 为 分公交车辆和超低排放
新 华 社 记 者 韩 岩 摄
１１．５英镑 ，通过 自动支 付系统 缴费 可减 车辆等 。
免 １英 镑 ，而推 迟到 下一个 收费 日才支
法治 天地 ｌ环球法治
伦 享 征 ＩＩ 交 通 拥 堵 费 ；
◆夏 晓
伦敦 市中心是世界最拥堵地 区之一 。 出车辆登记号码进行核
为减 少市 中心地带交 通拥 堵情况 以及为 对 。
伦敦交通系统 筹集 资金 ，自 ２００３年开始 ，
根据伦敦交通局 规
伦 敦 征 收 交 通 拥 堵 费 。
定 ，一些车辆也 可免 交
伦 敦拥堵 费是针 对每 周一至 周五 早 拥堵费 或得 到优惠 。免
７时至晚 ６时 （公共节假 目除外 ）在拥 堵 费的车 辆包 括 ：摩 托车
收费 区 内行驶 车辆所 征收 的费用 。拥 堵 和 自行车 、挂伦敦牌照
费用在过去 １Ｏ年有 所增长 ，目前已从最 的出租车 、应急服务车
初每天 ５英镑 （１英镑约合 ９．６８元人民币 ） 辆 、任 何 归属 国 防 部 的
上 涨 至 １１．５英 镑 。
浅析伦敦交通拥堵费
浅析伦敦交通拥堵费作者：罗晓燕来源：《企业文化·下旬刊》2014年第06期摘要：随着汽车工业的迅猛发展，交通拥堵已经成为困扰世界各国的突出问题。
为了缓解交通压力，提高城市的交通运营效率，伦敦市于2003年开始征收交通拥堵费。
本文分析了伦敦2003-2007年与2007-2013年两个时间段里征收交通拥堵费效果及原因，并阐释了伦敦征收交通拥堵费的方法对其他国家的启示。
关键词：伦敦；交通拥堵费；公共交通系统一、引言交通拥堵费是指在交通拥挤时段对部分区域道路使用者收取一定的费用，目的是利用价格机制来限制城市道路高峰期的车流密度，达到缓解城市交通拥挤的目的。
随着伦敦人口与机动车保有量持续增加，2003年伦敦地面交通时速仅为9.5公里。
前伦敦市长肯，利文斯通在竞选期间，提出对伦敦市特定区域的车辆征收交通拥堵费的竞选口号并在竞选获胜后，把征收交通拥堵费的想法付诸实践。
伦敦于2003年2月17号正式开始对拥堵区域收费。
伦敦交通拥堵费的征收区域是本顿维尔路、老街、塔桥路、大象城堡路等围成的城区。
伦敦交通拥堵费征收的时间是星期一至星期五，早上7点到下午6点。
拥堵费由最初的5英镑涨为现在的10英镑。
二、2003至2007年伦敦征收交通拥堵费取得效果及原因2003年10月23日，伦敦交通局发布了交通拥堵费征收半年报告。
这项报告显示征收交通拥堵费以来，进入收费区的车辆比收费前的2002年同期减少了6万辆。
行车速度由2002年的8.69英里增加到10.56英里。
所以，此项措施被证明在初期是非常有效的。
伦敦采用收费方式，以期减少市民使用私家车出行，改而乘坐公共交通工具出行，最终达到缓解交通拥堵的目的。
伦敦征收交通拥堵费得以实行，首先得益于伦敦强大的公共交通系统。
伦敦市至今共有12条地铁线，地铁站274个，总长度达250多英里。
伦敦路面人群主要由港区轻轨、地铁、城市火车和几百条公交线路进行分流，每天还有8000多辆公共汽车运行在700多条线路上。
高中英语外研版必修4Module 2 Section Ⅳ Other Parts of the Module
Los Angeles, which was built with the motor car in mind⑧， and is famous for⑨ its sixlane highways, is now the USA's most congested⑩ city. In Europe most capital cities were planned and built before cars, and city centre traffic jams have been part of a long time.
in cities which are growing fast ， such as Sao Paolo in Brazil and Lagos in Nigeria. But even cities in developed countries such as the US suffer⑦.
⑥ ④ ⑤
执照；登记
cameras record their registration⑲
numbers, and these are checked with ⑳a list of ……的清单
21 who引导定语从句，修饰 a list of⑳ drivers who have paid the ○
21 . charge for that day○
[原文呈现 ] [读文清障] The situation in central London, ⑫where 引导非限制性定语从
where drivers spent fifty percent of their time in queues⑫， became so bad that⑬ the local government
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
The London Congestion Charge
Beijing isn't the only city with traffic problems. You can get stuck in a traffic jam anywhere in the world. The worst problems occur in cities which are growing fast, such as Sao Paolo in Brazil and Lagos in Nigeria. But even cities in developed countries such as the US suffer. Los Angeles, which was built with the motor car in mind, and is famous for its six-lane highways, is now the USA's most congested city.
In Europe most capital cities were planned and built before cars, and city centre traffic jams have been part of daily life for a long time. The situation in central London，where drivers spent 50percent of their time in queues, became so bad that the local government decided to do something about it。
In February 2003 the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, introduced a "congestion charge"-a tax for cars entering the centre of the city.
The idea is simple: every car coming into the centre has to pay £5 a day. Drivers can pay the charge at any of 10,000 pay points in the capital before 10 pm. As the cars come into the centre, video cameras record their registration numbers, and these are checked with a list of drivers who have paid the charge for that day. People who do not pay the charge will face a fine of £80. Most Londoners are not happy with the idea. They agree that London has a traffic problem, but the congestion charge is expensive, and limits their freedom...
But does the congestion charge work A survey carried out at the end of 2003 suggestions it does. After only six months, traffic coming into central London was reduced by about 30 percent, and journey times by 15 percent. More people used public transport to get to work, and bicycles were suddenly very popular. What's more, central London shops did not lose business even though there were fewer cars.
But there are a few people who think the charge should be much higher, for example rich businessmen who work in the city centre and can easily afford it. This would keep even more cars out of central London, and the roads would be nearly empty. However, there are no plans to increase the charge.
伦敦交通拥堵费
北京并不是唯一存在交通堵塞问题的城市。
在世界上任何地方你都可能遇到交通堵塞。
发展快的城市问题最为严重，如巴西的圣保罗和尼日利亚的拉各斯。
然而，甚至在一些像美国这样的发达国家的城市里也存在这样的问题。
洛杉矶，一座在建市时就考虑了机动车辆问题的城市，以其六车道闻名，现在却是美国交通最堵塞的城市。
大多数欧洲首都城市在汽车大量涌入之前就已规划建造好了，可是，市中心堵车长久以来已成为人们日常生活的一部分了。
在伦敦市中心，司机花掉50%的时间排队，交通状况变得糟糕透了，于是当地政府决定就此采取一些措施。
2003年2月，伦敦市长KL推出了“交通拥堵费”--- 进入市中心的车辆交纳的税费。
这个想法很简单:每辆进入市中心的车辆必须每天交纳5英傍。
在晚上10点前，司机可以在首都10,000个收费点中的任意一个缴费。
当汽车进入市中心，摄像机会拍下他们的车牌号，用来检查司机是否在当天缴费。
不缴费的司机将面临80英镑的罚款。
大多数伦敦人对这个想法不满意。
他们认同伦敦有交通问题，但交通拥堵费太高，限制了他们的自由。
但是拥堵费起作用吗2003年底的一份调查表明的确起作用了。
仅在6个月之后，进入伦敦中心的车辆减少了30%，出行次数减少了15%。
更多的人乘公交车上班，自行车突然很受欢迎，此外，尽管车辆少了，但是伦敦市中心的商店没有失去生意。
然而，有一些人认为费用应该更很高，例如，在市中心工作的富有商人能够轻易地支付。
这可阻止更多的车辆驶入伦敦市中心，道路几乎会是空荡荡的。
然而，还没有提高拥堵费的计划。